MQTmxguy From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 5162 times:
Quoting atlamt (Reply 1): I personally like the EASA system. I feel it is designed to ensure the people working on aircraft have the knowledge and skills to do it properly
I agree, even though once one finds their way to the part 121 or 145 world you find yourself in a plethora of fleet ratings, training, and other quals that have to be maintained much like the European system. However in the GA world, the process consists of: Get A&P, find airplane, sign work.
I know guys I graduated college with 6 years ago that haven't touched an aircraft since but are still licensed to do so.
Well at least we can all take comfort in the fact that NW will never retire their DC-9s
charliecossie From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 479 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (3 years 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5142 times:
Britain and Germany will make you jump through hoops just to be allowed to sit (and most likely fail) the modules.
However, some EASA countries seem to hand out boxes of cornflakes with an extra piece of paper inside....