Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New LAX Departure Phraseology  
User currently offlineBoston From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4512 times:

I was listening to LAX ATC today for the first time in a few weeks. When did they implement the "RNAV DLREY or HIIPR) part into the departure clearance?

Example: "DLH451, RNAV DLREY, runway 24L cleared for takeoff."

This was the first time I've heard this phraseology used at LAX, so I was hoping someone could shed some light on this.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineflyhossd From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 746 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4487 times:

Yes, there's been a change in FAA ATC phraseology. WIthout looking it up, if the clearance is on a RNAV based departure, the clearance would be "RNAV" and the name of the first waypoint.

It's a simple change and a good one, I think.



My statements do not represent my former employer or my current employer and are my opinions only.
User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1608 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4437 times:

You can hear it all the time at DFW when they're using RNAV departures. "American seven heavy, wind one eight zero at niner, RNAV to BPARK, cleared for takeoff runway one eight left."


B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4317 times:

The new phraseology came out via a NOTICE that was effective September 17, 2012.

Quoting flyhossd (Reply 1):
if the clearance is on a RNAV based departure, the clearance would be "RNAV" and the name of the first waypoint.


Except when you're getting a vectors to the first waypoint. Not all of the airports use RNAV off the ground such as what the OP referenced, you have to look at the departure route description to see if it's vectors to a fix.

[Edited 2012-10-01 04:51:14]


Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineCosmicCruiser From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2254 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4257 times:

Hey IAHFLYR, we just got a bunch of new RNAV SIDS here in MEM so we're seeing the RNAV to the 1st wpt clearance.

User currently offlineBoston From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4226 times:

Well that explains everything and makes sense!

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4223 times:

Quoting CosmicCruiser (Reply 4):
Hey IAHFLYR, we just got a bunch of new RNAV SIDS here in MEM so we're seeing the RNAV to the 1st wpt clearance.


Yeah, some of the routes I see are vector to the first waypoint such as what the Houston area RNAV SIDS use, while other routes are direct to the fix.

Good luck and hopefully you guys won't have any cross overs!  



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4123 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4075 times:

This is probably common place in BOS, LAS, CLT and ATL as well which are airports that rely heavily on RNAV departures off the runway. There are some airports that use RNAV departures which are radar vectors to the first fix (IAH and MSP would be examples) where this would not be used, and LGA even uses procedures that are RNAV off the deck to a certain fix...then radar vectors to another fix on course.

The airlines want these procedures to be standard at all the big airports. The problem is that this has caused problems at some airports because of climb rate issues (Mainly with A321s and RJ's), causing problems and the airports have backed off. PHL, MCO, LGA to an extent, and IND are airports I know of where RNAV procedures were developed and tried, and then cancelled shortly thereafter. It would be nice if all airports had these because as a pilot I would much rather be navigating on my own then relying on Radar Vectors, which are still used too often in my opinion and they would also ease controller burden quite a bit.


User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3946 times:

Quoting apodino (Reply 7):
It would be nice if all airports had these because as a pilot I would much rather be navigating on my own then relying on Radar Vectors, which are still used too often in my opinion and they would also ease controller burden quite a bit.


While I don't disagree with you, until all boxes and aircraft fly the same lateral path of an RNAV procedure vectors are still needed. Also, quite often due to RNAV departure criteria used in procedure design increases flight track miles when a fairly large turn is required, when the vector is not subject to the same criteria and the turns are much tighter.

There are many cases where "Aircraft A" is flying a slightly different lateral path than "Aircraft B", even to the point of some boxes taking a turn at a fix coded fly-by and having the flight track appear as if it was coded fly-over. When using route containment for separation purposes those type of differences will shut the door.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinee38 From United States of America, joined May 2008, 300 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3842 times:

Quoting Boston (thread starter), "RNAV DLREY or HIIPR)"

Just to clarify, I think what you may have heard was "RNAV 'to' DLREY" or "RNAV 'to' HIPPR."

As others have pointed out, this is an excellent method to confirm between the pilot and air traffic controller that the routing the pilot expects to fly is the same as the routing ATC expects you to fly!

There are some SIDs that have different first waypoints depending on which runway is being used for takeoff and/or what the transition routing is.

Is this being implemented at all airports? To the best of my knowledge, they do not use the "RNAV to . . ." phraseology at Salt Lake City International airport (SLC) even though they use RNAV departures.

e38


User currently offlineRyDawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 851 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

DFW has been using this phraseology since Summer of 2009. The intent was to ensure the aircraft flew to the correct waypoint. If you look at the BLECO departure from DFW as an example. There are four possible routes to be flown on the departure. 1 track from each "half" of the airport and then 1 per flow. It was possible at times that a pilot would fly to the wrong intersection. For example, possibly the pilot had the track loaded in for a 18L/R departure but was assigned 17R/C. The pilot would end up flying to BPARK intersection versus NAVYE.

When RNAV first launched at DFW in the early 2000's, a separate frequency was established that would verify verbally with all pilots their first fix. This was in the infancy of RNAV and at an airport like DFW where a wrong turn can spell trouble fast, a stopgap measure was needed. Eventually, that special route verification procedure was stopped. However, in 2009 it became necessary to ensure that pilots flew the intended track -- thus "RNAV to..." became a thing.

In September 2012, order N 7110.595 was issued that required either a heading to be issued OR if simultaneous parallel RNAV departures were in use, to state "RNAV to first fix".

Additional background and the notice is public information and can be found on the FAA's public website.

I hope this helps,
Ryan



You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 23
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

Quoting e38 (Reply 9):
Is this being implemented at all airports? To the best of my knowledge, they do not use the "RNAV to . . ." phraseology at Salt Lake City International airport (SLC) even though they use RNAV departures.


See Reply 3 & 6.

Quoting RyDawg82 (Reply 10):
Additional background and the notice is public information and can be found on the FAA's public website.

Nice post and with the link Ryan.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic New LAX Departure Phraseology
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
New 737s, Smaller Galleys? posted Mon Sep 24 2012 03:29:00 by aerdingus
Trans-Atlantic 737 Routing New Norm? posted Mon Sep 17 2012 09:25:18 by bmacleod
My Idea For A New ULH Aircraft posted Sun Sep 16 2012 14:54:05 by PHX787
What Is LAX-RAR Diversion Airport? posted Sat Aug 25 2012 13:16:51 by DFWHeavy
Acquisition Cost On New Fuel Efficient Planes posted Thu Aug 23 2012 12:56:43 by fly828
What 737 Does UA Use On EWR-LAX? posted Wed Jul 25 2012 00:52:33 by EBGflyer
Left Turn Rwy 15 Departure At Cairns posted Sun Jul 22 2012 02:54:23 by n88kb
Questions Regarding Qantas LAX-JFK flights. posted Mon Jul 16 2012 05:24:36 by bastew
Tall Building On LAX, What Is It? posted Tue Jul 10 2012 16:01:55 by SLCPilot
GE: New Advances In Open Rotor Technology posted Fri Jul 6 2012 01:51:25 by faro

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format