Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus 320 Max Weight  
User currently offlinefanoftristars From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1615 posts, RR: 5
Posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4585 times:

I'm sitting at the gate at JFK on an Airbus 320. We're flight DL107 to SLC. We're over 45 min delayed now because our aircraft was loaded overweight (according to the captain). They're removing cargo now, but is it really not possible for the A320 to fly JFK-SLC with full passengers and cargo? I'm betting the 737-800 wouldn't have an issue with JFK runway lengths. Would this happen to the 738?


"FLY DELTA JETS"
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAesma From Reunion, joined Nov 2009, 6962 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4492 times:

Well it could be overweight as in over the MZFW if someone thought the load factor would be low enough to allow heavy cargo or something.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinezbbylw From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 1993 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4489 times:

The A320 can actually take off from shorter runways than the 737-800 as far as I am aware. What could have happened is that they were tankering some fuel into SLC, plus a tad too much cargo and volia a bit over weight. On a full bus with lots of people and some cargo stranger things have happened. It could very well be the landing weight that is limiting as far as I know the runway in SLC sits a fair ways above SL. There is a lot about this flight that we don't know but rest assured that the A320 could do JFK to SLC with a full passenger load unless something was up.

As an example: with an MEL if they had one of the brakes deactivated the RTO performance could have an issue.



Keep the shinny side up!
User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2858 posts, RR: 49
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4314 times:

Quoting fanoftristars (Thread starter):
They're removing cargo now, but is it really not possible for the A320 to fly JFK-SLC with full passengers and cargo? I'm betting the 737-800 wouldn't have an issue with JFK runway lengths. Would this happen to the 738?

MEL's and a variety of other things can grossly reduce the allowable takeoff weight; I have had excessive cargo put on every plane I have flown at some point, including the DC-9, MD-80, A-320, 737,757, and 767 (among others.) If a plane is planned with less than full passengers and load planners elect to put some heavy cargo on the aircraft, if the plane fills up in the last hour, or has more bags than expected show up it can require removing cargo, or bags, or fuel, or people. I have done all four under different circumstances. Without knowing the exact circumstances in much greater detail you can't form any valid conclusions about this case.


User currently offlineFI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4308 times:

The root cause of this is Central Load Control. Each separate department adds their weight in. It isn't until right before departure that final weights are sent. Only then is it apparent there is a problem. Been there, done that!


737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
User currently offlineVC10DC10 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1037 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3842 times:

Quoting PGNCS (Reply 3):

MEL's and a variety of other things can grossly reduce the allowable takeoff weight; I have had excessive cargo put on every plane I have flown at some point, including the DC-9, MD-80, A-320, 737,757, and 767 (among others.) If a plane is planned with less than full passengers and load planners elect to put some heavy cargo on the aircraft, if the plane fills up in the last hour, or has more bags than expected show up it can require removing cargo, or bags, or fuel, or people. I have done all four under different circumstances. Without knowing the exact circumstances in much greater detail you can't form any valid conclusions about this case.

Good insights, thanks! I'm just spitballin' here, but could a drastic change in winds or routing also affect weights?


User currently offlineprebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6545 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3563 times:

Quoting fanoftristars (Thread starter):
I'm sitting at the gate at JFK on an Airbus 320. We're flight DL107 to SLC. We're over 45 min delayed now because our aircraft was loaded overweight (according to the captain). They're removing cargo now, but is it really not possible for the A320 to fly JFK-SLC with full passengers and cargo?

That's correct. Loaded to MZFW (full passengers and cargo) the fuel tanks can be filled only half roughly. No way can such an A320 make JFK - SLC.

Quoting fanoftristars (Thread starter):
I'm betting the 737-800 wouldn't have an issue with JFK runway lengths.

It's not a question about runway length. Both A320 and B738 can easily take off at MTOW at JFK with plenty of runway to spare.

Quoting fanoftristars (Thread starter):
Would this happen to the 738?

Yup, it's the same old story. Both planes can make roughly US transcon with full passenger load and no cargo. Load one tonne of cargo on top of that, then you load one tonne less fuel. At MZFW also the B738 maxes out on MTOW with roughly half full tanks and will no way make it anywhere near SLC.

You just experienced a slip in the basic DL load planning system. They will probably do better tomorrow.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlinemon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2012, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3103 times:

Of the 320's I've flown the max weights in metric tonnes have been:
MTOW 77T
MLW 64.5T
MZFW 61T


User currently offlinericknroll From Afghanistan, joined Jan 2012, 900 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3097 times:

Quoting FI642 (Reply 4):
The root cause of this is Central Load Control. Each separate department adds their weight in. It isn't until right before departure that final weights are sent. Only then is it apparent there is a problem. Been there, done that!

Did some accountant think it would save money by not working all this out till the last minute?


User currently offlineart From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3398 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3049 times:

Quoting ricknroll (Reply 8):
Quoting FI642 (Reply 4):
The root cause of this is Central Load Control. Each separate department adds their weight in. It isn't until right before departure that final weights are sent. Only then is it apparent there is a problem. Been there, done that!


Did some accountant think it would save money by not working all this out till the last minute?

Seems to invite problems that could be avoided. What's the reason for doing things the way they are done now if it occasionally leads to needing to unload?


User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

I assume they base their weights on load assumptions based on reservations. The freight department will want to put as much of their load in, but last minute pax, extra fuel (weather, tankering, aircraft switch...), or even a MEL item can change that. Add the tight scheduling of regional ops and you can end up with stuff on board whose room has been rented to someone else already...

Quoting fanoftristars (Thread starter):
I'm betting the 737-800 wouldn't have an issue with JFK runway lengths. Would this happen to the 738?

Are you looking for an explanation or ammunition?...



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5164 posts, RR: 43
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2739 times:

My guess is that last minute passengers, or last minute cargo put the aircraft over MTOW, due to the fuel already loaded.

It's not that the aircraft can't do it, its more that when you get close to MTOW, these things need careful planning. This could happen to any aircraft type at any airport.

Weight and Balance is dynamic, and the load agent will work with the information he has and adjust it as factors change. If he detects a possible problem, he will advise the necessary departments. But ... sometimes things happen all at once ... the Captain will need 3000kgs more fuel, at the same time Cargo see open weight and adds 3000kgs of cargo, at the same time that Sales sees 30 open seats and fills them due to cancellations (3000kgs) ... everyone vying for the same open weight. And not all can be accommodated.

It doesn't happen open, but it does happen!



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Airbus 320 Max Weight
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus 320 Curious Flight Profile posted Fri Nov 7 2008 10:44:21 by William
Max Weight And Ranges For The A330 Family? posted Thu May 29 2008 20:16:28 by EA772LR
Airbus Cockpit Tray Weight Limit posted Fri Dec 24 2004 04:55:58 by Goboeing
Airbus 320 Cargo Doors Come Flying Out! posted Wed Oct 22 2003 06:50:29 by Flyboy80
HF Radios In Boeing 737, Airbus 320 posted Sat Mar 8 2003 02:51:23 by AZFAN
Range Of B772ER When At Max Weight posted Sat Oct 27 2001 12:12:34 by Mr.BA
Airbus 320 & Wiring Diagrams (long) posted Fri May 25 2001 11:49:19 by T prop
Fuel Dumping And Max Landing Weight posted Tue Jun 12 2012 13:54:42 by smartt1982
Max Take Off Weight posted Mon Jun 11 2012 13:53:13 by smartt1982
Airbus Weight Variants posted Sat Mar 19 2011 12:01:58 by trex8

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format