Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fly Into Ground Vs Stall Into The Ground  
User currently offlinesmartt1982 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4003 times:

In the QRH checklist for the 737 NG which uses Flap 15 for landing there is a Go-around procedure review.

In it the checklist states that in the event of go-around the pilot should either fly the corrected Vref speed or the minimum manoeuvre speed (top of the amber band) which ever is LOWER.
I cannot seem to understand the reason for using the lower speed of the two. Someone mentioned that it is similar to what a pilot would do like with the BA 777 at EGLL when they lost both engines. The pilot in that case pitched down to gain airspeed. This reduced speed reduced the G and it was better to fly the aircraft into the ground than stall it into the ground.
If anyone could explain the science behind this I would be very grateful.


3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineLitz From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3973 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I imagine it's a difference between controlling one's descent, and - literally - falling out of the sky.

In the former case, you have control (even if marginally) over your descent rate.

In the latter case, you fall at the force of gravity.

I can't see any instance where the latter isn't going to be greater than the former ... and I would think if the end result is an impact with the ground, you'd want it to be minimized as much as possible.

Stalling has to be the absolutely last thing one would ever want to do, in any circumstance, since it involves a loss of control.

User currently offlineFabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3956 times:

Litz, I think you misunderstood the question, but for the other part you are right. On the other hand I dont see what the question has to do with the title.


Quoting smartt1982 (Thread starter):
In it the checklist states that in the event of go-around the pilot should either fly the corrected Vref speed or the minimum manoeuvre speed (top of the amber band) which ever is LOWER.
I cannot seem to understand the reason for using the lower speed of the two.

Think this. Thrust is what effectively makes aircraft move. It makes aircraft move forward and upward, granting it potential and kinetic energy.
Effectively, you use X amount of thrust to counter current drag. More speed means more drag, less speed means less drag (remember now we are talking airliners on typical speed, no 2nd regime funnies). You have Y amount of total thrust.
To use Y-X to climb, you want the X to be as low as possible, in effect to be the speed as low as possible.

Now, the method of calculating Vref corr and Vman (or whatever they call it) is such, that it assures that on neither of these speeds you run the risk of stalling. Therefore of these two, you select the lower one, and you can be sure you will not stall. Ideally, you would fly even slower and climb even faster, but that is dangerous since you are not guaranteed sufficient protection from stall.

The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
User currently offlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 7561 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3911 times:

Lower of Top of Amber band speed or Adjusted Vref?
Top of amber band = minimum maneuver speed for capability... valid at CURRENT configuration.

If adjusted Vref is above top of amber band, your climb won't be optimal.
If adjusted Vref is below top of amber band (but above red-black), you're climbing with a Alpha closer to A-Cl-Max but not at A-Cl-Max (somewhere below red-black top)... BUT, keep your wings level.

The visual picture on the PFD's ASI tape should show you, "don't turn much!"

You also need to consider single engine situations, and also engine failure during go-around...

But, also remember, the amber band slides when you change flap config... the Vref, jumps. Where to pick while in transit? Simple, lower of the two values.

Whatever it is, the absolute limit is the top of the red-black.   
As long as you're above that, yeah, you can pick the lower of 2 choices...   

When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fly Into Ground Vs Stall Into The Ground
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
For The Pilots Who Routinely Fly Into PVD... posted Thu Jan 9 2003 05:50:12 by John
Pilots - Favorite Airports To Fly Into? posted Sat Sep 13 2003 15:06:07 by 9V-SVE
A330 Vs A340: Why The Range Difference? posted Mon Jan 10 2011 18:58:00 by YULWinterSkies
Crosswind Landing-- Slip Vs Stall Speed posted Tue Jul 22 2008 07:54:06 by Dakota123
BA38: Autothrust Moving Vs Not Moving The Levers posted Fri Jan 25 2008 03:12:13 by Faro
GE F-110 Vs F-118 What's The Differences posted Thu Mar 23 2006 01:37:05 by 747400sp
QFF Vs QNH... What's The Difference? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 14:22:51 by D-AIGW
Flying Into The Eye Of A Hurricane; How? posted Fri Aug 26 2011 15:12:44 by notaxonrotax
Near Ground Collision YYC (LH A340 Vs WS 737-600) posted Sat May 14 2011 17:17:44 by Viscount724
Taxi Into Position And Hold Vs Line Up And Wait posted Sun Aug 15 2010 13:24:43 by accidentally

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format