Runway Lights Vs Runway Flood
PHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 8347 posts, RR: 19 Posted Mon Oct 29 2012 23:48:44 UTC (3 years 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4262 times:
So in light of EWR, LGA, and JFK having some submersion issues, I want to know how that floodwater effects the electronics involved with runway lights, ILS, and other systems at the airport.
I know they're supposed to handle rain, snow, and ice, but what about submersion?
Other submersion issues i've seen recently are like at SDJ and Don Muang Airport. What happens? Lots of repairs needed?
Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
jumbojim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 05:44:09 UTC (3 years 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4159 times:
Hey Zak interesting question I'm not sure but i think they would be sealed units designed with fluds in mind.
Then again they could be old designs.
On a wing and a prayer
Fabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 07:43:02 UTC (3 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 4103 times:
I would expect them to be designed for a couple inches of standing water. But what happens once it gets to a foot or two, I honestly have no idea.
The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
web500sjc From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 889 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 09:09:41 UTC (3 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 4068 times:
How about the ILS equipment. isnt that out in the open?
rfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7747 posts, RR: 32
Reply 4, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 10:57:41 UTC (3 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3987 times:
Quoting web500sjc ( Reply 3): How about the ILS equipment. isnt that out in the open?
The antennas with weather proof sealed elements is out in the open. The building with the electronics might be susceptible to water four or five feet deep.
KELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6760 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 12:54:43 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3919 times:
Quoting rfields5421 ( Reply 4): The antennas with weather proof sealed elements is out in the open. The building with the electronics might be susceptible to water four or five feet deep.
Paging a.net member mmedford...who's probably quite busy repairing localizers and glideslope transmitters as we speak...
I would imagine, though, that salt water is not very good for navaids, directional aids, or runway lighting It will be interesting to see the NOTAM's for OTS equipment once the airports in the NYC area open up again...
Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
Mir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 22558 posts, RR: 55
Reply 6, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 14:27:23 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3871 times:
Quoting KELPkid ( Reply 5): It will be interesting to see the NOTAM's for OTS equipment once the airports in the NYC area open up again...
JFK 10/234 JFK RWY 22R RVR OTS
JFK 10/233 JFK RWY 4L RVR OTS
JFK 10/236 JFK RWY 13R RVR OTS
JFK 10/237 JFK RWY 31L RVR OTS
JFK 10/250 JFK RWY 4R ALS OTS
JFK 10/232 JFK RWY 4R RVR OTS
JFK 10/235 JFK RWY 22L RVR OTS
JFK 10/212 JFK RWY 13R PAPI OTS WEF(effective from) 1210291346
JFK 10/213 JFK RWY 31L PAPI OTS WEF(effective from) 1210291347
JFK 10/251 JFK RWY 22L ALS OTS
JFK 10/226 JFK NAV ILS RWY 4R OTS WEF(effective from) 1210292355
JFK 10/229 JFK NAV ILS RWY 22R OTS
JFK 10/230 JFK NAV ILS RWY 31R OTS
JFK 10/231 JFK NAV ILS RWY 31L OTS
JFK 10/221 JFK NAV ILS RWY 22L OTS WEF(effective from) 1210292356
JFK 10/228 JFK NAV ILS RWY 4L OTS
JFK 10/245 JFK NAV RWY 13L DME OTS
JFK 10/249 JFK NAV ILS RWY 31L OTS
JFK 10/223 JFK NAV ILS RWY 13L OTS WEF(effective from) 1210292357
JFK 10/243 JFK NAV RWY 4L DME OTS
JFK 10/244 JFK NAV RWY 4R DME OTS
JFK 04/016 JFK NAV VOR/ DME UNUSBL 060-099 BYD 25 BLW 2500
JFK 04/017 JFK NAV VOR/ DME UNUSBL 100-299 BYD 30 BLW 2000
JFK 04/018 JFK NAV VOR/ DME UNUSBL 300-059 BYD 30 BLW 2500
JFK 04/281 JFK NAV ILS RWY 13L DME UNUSBL 30 DEGREE RIGHT OF CNTRLN
JFK 10/241 JFK TWY ALL LIGHTS OTS
JFK 10/227 JFK TWY ALL SIGNS ALL UNLGTD WEF(effective from) 1210300001-1210302300
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
mmedford From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 561 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted
Tue Oct 30 2012 16:01:23 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3817 times:
Meh; I don't have the kind of time to explain what's going on locally here...
But; rainwater and salt water are two different breeds...rainwater we just wipe off, and it's business as usual.
With the saltwater we had; we have to rebuild everything affected.
Mir; the reason the equipment was removed from service has something to do with ICAO CoS.
ILS = It'll Land Somewhere
woodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1145 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted
Thu Nov 1 2012 11:04:11 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3239 times:
From what our SOC is telling us regarding New York ops.
LGA using 13/31 with expressway visual 31 being the primary approach. 4/22 Sked to reopen later today
Approach navaids to be tested today as well. Only RNAVs approaches avail. Arrival rate of 32 planes per hour. Flights to tanker fuel into LGA
JFK. Using 13/31s. Primary approaches LOC 31L/R. 4/22L/R closed until Friday. Rnav 13L/R available. Arrival rate of 55 planes / hr
Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31821 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted
Fri Nov 2 2012 01:56:43 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3054 times:
Water resistant yes.....but submerged for a long duration....very unlikely.unless some Airport is willing to spend that kind of $.
Think of the brighter side!
PHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 8347 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted
Sat Nov 3 2012 12:43:36 UTC (3 years 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2802 times:
Thanks for the info, and good luck with the repairs! How much had to be repaired after the hurricane?
Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787