tmoney From Myanmar, joined Nov 2011, 26 posts, RR: 0 Posted (6 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 5032 times:
When I google searched it there's a link on Yahoo answers that says because their APU generators aren't strong enough and their aircrafts' airconditioners draw too much power from the engines. Is that why Russian/Soviet aircraft need to have a fan in the cockpit?
Besides those fans don't have covers around their blades! Doesn't that pose a threat to the flight crew?
aviatorcraig From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2010, 85 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (6 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4888 times:
Yeah, and also why are their cockpit panels always painted turquoise, AND why do all Russian aircraft from fighters to transports have their wheel hubs painted olive drab green? I think we should be told!
Dufo From Slovenia, joined May 1999, 752 posts, RR: 4 Reply 3, posted (6 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4852 times:
We had those fans on L410 and they were sufficient and caused less clogged noses and soar throats than air conditioning with apu on other types.
Blades are made of rubber, you can easily stop them even with a finger.
I seriously think I just creamed my pants without any influence from any outside variables.
NASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3099 posts, RR: 5 Reply 5, posted (6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3994 times:
Quoting s5daw (Reply 1): I have seen a fan in an Antonov An2, but modern jets, really?
HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31228 posts, RR: 58 Reply 9, posted (6 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3260 times:
Quoting aviatorcraig (Reply 2): Yeah, and also why are their cockpit panels always painted turquoise, AND why do all Russian aircraft from fighters to transports have their wheel hubs painted olive drab green? I think we should be told!
They Russians believed it reduced fatigue & kept the crew Alert
Quoting tmoney (Thread starter):
Besides those fans don't have covers around their blades! Doesn't that pose a threat to the flight crew?
bohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2430 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (6 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3210 times:
Quoting tmoney (Thread starter): there's a link on Yahoo answers that says because their APU generators aren't strong enough and their aircrafts' airconditioners draw too much power from the engines.
I think it has more to do whether the cockpit was equipped with gasper vents or not. In the pictures with fans, I didn't see any gasper vents but I saw them in photos of the more modern planes without fans.
Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 7): I guess it never occurred to the topic starter it might simply be a good idea.
The OP never said it was a bad idea. He is just asking a question.
tmoney From Myanmar, joined Nov 2011, 26 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (6 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3159 times:
Quoting bohica (Reply 10): The OP never said it was a bad idea. He is just asking a question.
Thank you. Yes, I was just asking a question.
And thanks for all the input too. I just thought it's ironic that while the massive jet engines' fan blades are pushing the aircraft forward, there are tiny lil fans that's blowing at almost the opposite direction in the flight deck.
bikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1628 posts, RR: 4 Reply 12, posted (6 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3117 times:
That is an interesting trade.
The fan is a simple installation that only require electricity as opposed to ducting and stuff in a gasper air.
How are the equipment in the cockpit cooled? Draw through or blow-by? If it's draw through then the gasper air would require a separate ducting system.
Of course, with the fans you may have higher failure rate/maintenance issue depending or how reliable those fans are . . . but I guess you can still dispatch if one of those fail
saafnav From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 213 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2996 times:
Quoting tmoney (Reply 11):
And thanks for all the input too. I just thought it's ironic that while the massive jet engines' fan blades are pushing the aircraft forward, there are tiny lil fans that's blowing at almost the opposite direction in the flight deck.
So if you put in on the conveyor belt, and have the fans blowing over the pigeons in the back, you won't take off?
KC135Hydraulics From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 165 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2921 times:
On the KC-135 we have at least 5 fans on the flight deck. They all have cages around them of course! There is no air conditioning system for use on the ground so they're a requirement for a warm day. You want pictures?
bond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5098 posts, RR: 8 Reply 16, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2697 times:
Quoting tmoney (Reply 11): And thanks for all the input too. I just thought it's ironic that while the massive jet engines' fan blades are pushing the aircraft forward, there are tiny lil fans that's blowing at almost the opposite direction in the flight deck.
Well, wouldn't they be blowing the same direction as the big fans on the wings?
In this case they will of course be providing additional thrust, which is necessary for some of the under-powered Russian aircraft. Obviously 5 fans are required for a fully loaded KC-135, because it's heavier.
They are usually the type that can rotate at least 180 degrees, so you often see the pilots quickly turn them in the opposite direction upon landing, especially if the engines do not have thrust reversers.
Basic stuff really.
Jimbo
I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!