Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Width Affecting Aerodynamic Efficiency  
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1083 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1771 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

Hey guys

I remember reading a while back that it helps increase aerodynamic efficiency for an airplanes width to be more aerodynamically efficient if it rapidly increases. The example given is engines under the wings make the change in width from the fuselage to the wing tips more rapid than just following the leading edge of the wing. Am I crazy and mis remembering or is this a real thing?

Thanks...


DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17041 posts, RR: 66
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

I think you're talking about "area ruling". However it is not really about rapid change; more like "even" change.

Area ruling works like this. The "ideal" aerodynamic shape is like a tapered cigar. Think the fuselage of a Lockheed Constellation. The central concept is that the cross sectional area must taper, even if it is not shaped like a cigar. So you will have little area at the nose, growing towards the middle, and tapering off towards the tail. If you look at a 380 from below, you will see that the wing/fuselage fairing is quite "fat" in the rear. This avoids a drastic decrease in cross sectional area and makes the cross sectional area tapering smooth. The engines and flap track fairings play important roles in area ruling as well.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Width Affecting Aerodynamic Efficiency
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fuel Efficiency / Consumption Of Older Planes? posted Tue Jul 24 2012 04:43:43 by Senatorflyer
Fuel Efficiency Of Boeing 777-300 posted Thu Jun 28 2012 00:00:40 by celestar
Winglets Efficiency For SA Questioned posted Tue Apr 10 2012 07:48:54 by ferpe
A320 Width Question posted Wed Apr 4 2012 03:19:15 by Max Q
Q400 Improved Efficiency? posted Mon Feb 20 2012 05:30:35 by baje427
787/A350: Efficiency From Lasting Slickness posted Mon Oct 31 2011 10:55:33 by faro
Route Analysis: Calculating Route Efficiency posted Fri Jul 22 2011 18:16:38 by coffeepilot
Efficiency Of Modern Cfrp Airliners posted Sun May 22 2011 00:09:29 by ferpe
Turboprop Efficiency At Long Distances posted Sun Feb 27 2011 17:44:51 by cloudboy
Squeezing More Efficiency Out Of The MD-11 posted Thu Feb 24 2011 10:55:46 by tsugambler

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format