YYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1202 posts, RR: 1 Posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2341 times:
I remember reading a while back that it helps increase aerodynamic efficiency for an airplanes width to be more aerodynamically efficient if it rapidly increases. The example given is engines under the wings make the change in width from the fuselage to the wing tips more rapid than just following the leading edge of the wing. Am I crazy and mis remembering or is this a real thing?
Starlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17628 posts, RR: 65
Reply 1, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2321 times:
I think you're talking about "area ruling". However it is not really about rapid change; more like "even" change.
Area ruling works like this. The "ideal" aerodynamic shape is like a tapered cigar. Think the fuselage of a Lockheed Constellation. The central concept is that the cross sectional area must taper, even if it is not shaped like a cigar. So you will have little area at the nose, growing towards the middle, and tapering off towards the tail. If you look at a 380 from below, you will see that the wing/fuselage fairing is quite "fat" in the rear. This avoids a drastic decrease in cross sectional area and makes the cross sectional area tapering smooth. The engines and flap track fairings play important roles in area ruling as well.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."