Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thrust Reverser Deployment Before Touchdown  
User currently offlineGonzalo From Chile, joined Aug 2005, 1988 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7249 times:

I was doing my usual tour for some of the aviation video channels, and I came across this video of a Tu-154 activating the thrust reverser well before the wheels touched the runway. I had the ( wrong? ) idea about all the commercial / civil aircraft had weight on wheels sensors, to prevent in flight deployment of the T/R ( I remember the case of a Lauda Air Boeing 767 crashed after an uncommanded T/R activation, with a high loss of lives )

Video :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq5HLtdGeqE

Is this a characteristic of the Tu 154 ? Or was this particular aircraft on the video under some special condition ( MEL'd, Ferry flight to MX ) ?

Are there any other civilian / pax aircraft type / model that allows this ?

Thanks in advance.

Rgds.
G.


80 Knots...V1...Rotate...Gear Up...DC-3 / EMB-110 / Fairchild-227 / Ab318-19-20 / B732 / B763
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19708 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7197 times:

Quoting Gonzalo (Thread starter):
Is this a characteristic of the Tu 154 ? Or was this particular aircraft on the video under some special condition ( MEL'd, Ferry flight to MX ) ?
Deploying The Thrust Reverser While Flairing? (by LH492 Jul 25 2006 in Civil Aviation)
Photo Question (by Kaitak744 Oct 24 2005 in Civil Aviation)

There are a few others. Presumably, the Tu154 locks out the reversers until the engines are at idle, although given that it's a 1960's Russian design, I'm not entirely sure about that.


User currently offlinenorthstardc4m From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3024 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7181 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

This was the case on a few jetliners:
DC-8 up to model 61
VC-10
IL-62
some models of Tu-134 and most is not all models of the Tu-154

Not common but if the plane is designed for it...
DC-8s had it only on engines 2 and 3, and some issues causing a couple crashes cause it to be disabled later on.



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2930 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7187 times:

AFAIK a few other aircraft can do that too, including the IL-62. See at about 0:32 on this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N29ZFnQfm7I

Fuzzy memories make me think the DC-8 was also capable.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3076 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7072 times:

Quoting northstardc4m (Reply 2):
Not common but if the plane is designed for it...
DC-8s had it only on engines 2 and 3, and some issues causing a couple crashes cause it to be disabled later on.

The DC-8 in flight thrust reversers were intended to be used as speedbrakes. I don't think they were intended for use shortly before touchdown the OP was referring to. I'm not aware of crashed because of it. I experienced as a passenger as late as 1977 and thought I heard that the CFM engines on the -71s and -73 were also designed to used in reverse in flight.

Can you elaborate on the crashes and how in-flight thrust reverse used was disabled on the DC-8s?


User currently offlinemigair54 From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 1729 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7069 times:

If i´m not mistaken the conconrde also could do to reduce speed, Russian planes as usual have some special features, they fly in somehow a different way from the western planes.

For example, when you see a russian plane taking off, for them getting speed first and then climbing is the procedure, but for western planes altitude is first then speed, if you think a bit in a place with a big clearway and no noise abatement it could be a good practice because in the Lift formula V is Square so increasing speed has a very big effect on lift.

But anyway, I´ve seen few Tu-154 and IL-62 mainly doing that. I think the pilatus porter can also do, but of course that´s not a jetliner.

Quoting northstardc4m (Reply 2):
DC-8s had it only on engines 2 and 3, and some issues causing a couple crashes cause it to be disabled later on.

i´m sure the forces generated in the pylon of the engines must have been terrible, they are designed to do let the engine pull the plane forward and not backward.


User currently offlineCitationjet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2438 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7026 times:

Here are other threads on this topic:
DC-8 And Reverse Thrust Use In Flight (by Ttailsteve Jul 3 2006 in Civil Aviation)

Thrust Reversers Before Touchdown? (by DocLightning Jul 7 2008 in Tech Ops)?threadid=232417&searchid=232483&s=DC-8+reverse#ID232483

Inflight Reverse Thrust On DC 8 (by 6YJCX Dec 4 2007 in Tech Ops)?threadid=211585&searchid=211930&s=DC-8+reverse#ID211930



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineBlueShamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 2933 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7000 times:

A few more of the IL-62 for you to enjoy.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL79CE8bV3U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TyV9cEiNHE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYuiWPoIbew

Rgds



So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlinenorthstardc4m From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3024 posts, RR: 36
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 6998 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 4):
Can you elaborate on the crashes and how in-flight thrust reverse used was disabled on the DC-8s?
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/211585/

apparently all 4 engines could do reverse sorry... and I was under the impression that it was actually disabled, though apparently it was just airline policy.

And i'm finding more types:
Trident
Concorde
Tu-144
Jetstar



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineTristarsteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 4009 posts, RR: 33
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6663 times:

Quoting northstardc4m (Reply 8):
Trident

Ah de Havilland.
Now the Trident only had reverse on 1 and 3.
But they were deployed regularly in the descent as speedbrakes.
Then the aircraft could descend very fast. So fast that one Trident, I think it was the 2E did not have passenger oxygen fitted. In case of emergency, engines to idle, select reverse, descend nose down!


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3076 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6643 times:

Quoting Tristarsteve (Reply 9):
So fast that one Trident, I think it was the 2E did not have passenger oxygen fitted. In case of emergency, engines to idle, select reverse, descend nose down!

I can't imagine that. It's still like 3 minutes from cruise to 10,000 feet.


User currently offlineMH017 From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 1691 posts, RR: 30
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 6367 times:

Flew once a Syrian YAK-40, and they applied the (single) thrust-reverser before touch-down at DAM...


don't throw away tomorrow !
User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 42
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 6322 times:

Quoting Tristarsteve (Reply 9):
So fast that one Trident, I think it was the 2E did not have passenger oxygen fitted.

Actually, it was the other way around. The Trident One, and the Trident Three did not have passenger oxygen (in Britain, I am not sure about export models), the Trident Two did.

Same thing with most versions of the BAC-111, no passenger oxygen.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 79
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6191 times:

Quoting Gonzalo (Thread starter):
I had the ( wrong? ) idea about all the commercial / civil aircraft had weight on wheels sensors, to prevent in flight deployment of the T/R

They all have systems to prevent inadvertent T/R deployment. Those aren't always weight-on-wheels sensors. The 737, for example, can deploy off the radio altimeter (and hence can deploy in a very thin range of "in-the-air").

Tom.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 843 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 6135 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
They all have systems to prevent inadvertent T/R deployment. Those aren't always weight-on-wheels sensors. The 737, for example, can deploy off the radio altimeter (and hence can deploy in a very thin range of "in-the-air").

Tom





Tom: I believe once the "sync-loc" mod. was installed the reversers can not and will not deploy until weight on wheels. You can pull the handle but nothing will happen until then.

As far as the DC-8 the inboard reversers can be deployed at any time. There is a mechanical lock off of the nose landing gear to prevent deployment of the outboard reversers. I have flown many test hops where this system was verified and it feels like you hit a wall when those CFM-56-2s are reversed in flight. Remember the DC-8 does not have speedbrakes so they use the reversers to slow.


User currently offlinePGNCS From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 2825 posts, RR: 45
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6103 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
Quoting Gonzalo (Thread starter): I had the ( wrong? ) idea about all the commercial / civil aircraft had weight on wheels sensors, to prevent in flight deployment of the T/R
They all have systems to prevent inadvertent T/R deployment. Those aren't always weight-on-wheels sensors. The 737, for example, can deploy off the radio altimeter (and hence can deploy in a very thin range of "in-the-air").

Tom.

The DC-9 series has nothing to inhibit inflight deployment (WoW or RA, etc.) other than good sense. In over 10,000 hours on the aircraft I have never seen it be an issue. Of course the throttle does have to be at idle first, so I suppose you could make the argument that this interlock is a system to prevent inadvertent deployment, though it will NOT prevent inflight deployment regardless of altitude.


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 79
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6087 times:

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 14):
Tom: I believe once the "sync-loc" mod. was installed the reversers can not and will not deploy until weight on wheels. You can pull the handle but nothing will happen until then.

The sync-lock is triggered by microswitches on the T/R deploy handles...the sync-locks will release as soon as you pull up on the handles. They're there to prevent a Lauda-type incident by providing an independent level of redundancy in the actuation hardware. The sync-locks will not prevent an intentional deployment.

Assuming that the pilot pulls the levers (releasing the sync locks), another relay needs to actuate to command hydaulic fluid to the actuators. The ground for that relay can go through two paths...one is the air/ground system (basically weight-on-wheels) and the other is the radio altitude from the flight control computer (less than 10'). Either path is sufficient to allow deployment so if you're on the ground (specifically, the air/ground relay is in ground) or the FCC thinks you're less than 10' from the ground, the T/R's will deploy.

If you have access, check out 737 AMM SDS 78-34-00 for more details.

The key to most T/R systems is preventing *inadvertent* deployment. Many aircraft will inhibit deployment in flight regardless what the crew says but all of them don't want the T/R's to ever deploy unless the flight crew wants them to.

Tom.


User currently offlineXXXX10 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 777 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5625 times:

Quoting Tristarsteve (Reply 9):

Not sure about the TU144
I may be wrong but AFAIK there where no T/R on this bird. I beleive a parachute was used on landing !


User currently offlineSasha From Russia, joined May 1999, 861 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5567 times:

Yak-40 also could do this. not sure about Yak-42. landed in one last sunday - it didn't use it  


An2/24/28,Yak42,Tu154/134,IL18/62/96,B737/757/767,A310/320/319,F100,BAe146,EMB-145,CRJ,A340-600,B747-400,A-330-300,A-340
User currently offlineFabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1219 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5376 times:

IIRC YK42 does not have reversers - at all.


The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
User currently offlineatct From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2293 posts, RR: 38
Reply 20, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5003 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 10):

There are also regs (someone else will have to find em) that say how many O2 masks are required per passenger. I was a flight attendant on a US regional and though we "briefed" the masks, we did not have more than 1 for each 10 passengers on board the aircraft.

atct



"The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing." - Walt Disney
User currently offlineDualQual From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4068 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):

IIRC (haven't really looked at that system page in a while) it's 10feet on the RA you can deploy the reversers on the 737. I don't know why anyone would want to do that but you could.


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 42
Reply 22, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3971 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
They all have systems to prevent inadvertent T/R deployment. Those aren't always weight-on-wheels sensors. The 737, for example, can deploy off the radio altimeter (and hence can deploy in a very thin range of "in-the-air").

That must have been later B737s, the B737s I flew (-200, and -200ADV) required positive oil pressure and weight on wheels to power the hydraulics to work.

In fact, some of them also had a squat switch in the nose wheel as well, which also had to be activated. Makes sense, the -200 had huge buckets and in a nose high attitude, you could scrape them on the ground.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 79
Reply 23, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3835 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 22):
That must have been later B737s, the B737s I flew (-200, and -200ADV) required positive oil pressure and weight on wheels to power the hydraulics to work.

Yes, I was talking -300 and onwards. -100/-200 had a totally different reverser system.

Tom.


User currently offlineKaiarahi From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 3002 posts, RR: 27
Reply 24, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3712 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 4):
Can you elaborate on the crashes

NZ lost a DC-8 at AKL on a training flight when a TR was activated on a touch-and-go. My father was an FE with NZ at the time and scheduled to be on that flight, but was swapped out for other duties.



Empty vessels make the most noise.
User currently offlineBA777 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2179 posts, RR: 7
Reply 25, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3695 times:

Yep thats correct on the 737 you can deploy them just before touchdown, a Captain did it last week and it made for a very....commercial landing!

User currently offlinefsnuffer From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 252 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3648 times:

While at Offutt there were rumors RC-135 pilots were deploying TR during the flare and it was called a "Shemya Short Landing". Since I never took a flight to Shemya, it is only second hand.

User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 42
Reply 27, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Quoting Kaiarahi (Reply 24):
NZ lost a DC-8 at AKL on a training flight when a TR was activated on a touch-and-go. My father was an FE with NZ at the time and scheduled to be on that flight, but was swapped out for other duties.

When I hear stories like this, I often think of fate.

My father was supposed to be the Second Officer of the Trans-Canada DC-8 that was lost at YUL in 1963, but the crew's inbound flight was late and a reserve crew was used instead. When I asked him about that, he just said, "If I were on the aircraft, it wouldn't have crashed, I guess it was meant to crash!"

Maybe it was the same in your Father's case. His hand on the thrust levers might have had a different weight, angle, etc ... and the T/R would not have been activated.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineKaiarahi From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 3002 posts, RR: 27
Reply 28, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3276 times:

Fate for sure! I can't find the accident report archived anywhere, but the story within NZ at the time was that the training captain (left seat) may have hooked his finger around the "leg" of #4 throttle (rather than the knob) and pulled it back aggressively (they were doing engine out drills), causing the TR to jerk up and deploy. If he'd had his hand on the top of the throttle, it likely wouldn't have happened. As I recall the report, there was a recommendation for better TR lever mechanical protection, but I don't remember if it was implemented. I do remember that when I was learning to fly Hercs a few years later, simulated engine out training was done with a smooth throttle retardation - the AKL accident was still fresh in everyone's mind.


Empty vessels make the most noise.
User currently offlineKaiarahi From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 3002 posts, RR: 27
Reply 29, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3277 times:

Whoops - training captain was right seat .... And in the DC-8, they were actually called "thrust brakes", rather than TRs.

[Edited 2013-01-07 12:34:27]


Empty vessels make the most noise.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Thrust Reverser Deployment Before Touchdown
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thrust Reversers Before Touchdown? posted Mon Jul 7 2008 22:29:41 by DocLightning
Uneven Reverser Deployment, Is It Normal? posted Mon Aug 27 2012 13:05:23 by n797mx
Revving Up The Wheels Before Touchdown posted Fri Sep 2 2011 03:43:52 by faro
Advancement In Engine Thrust Reverser? posted Tue Sep 7 2010 02:21:22 by celestar
In-Flight Thrust Reverser Usage posted Sat Sep 26 2009 18:46:08 by C5LOAD
Adding Power Just Before Touchdown posted Sat Aug 1 2009 02:34:26 by Starlionblue
Will 747-8I Have Four Thrust Reverser posted Thu Nov 13 2008 19:07:59 by 747400sp
A340 Thrust Reverser Question posted Fri Apr 11 2008 14:27:58 by Viscount724
Thrust Reverser Problems With GE90's? posted Fri Nov 30 2007 13:41:56 by 747Dreamlifter
Maximum DC-8 Mid-Air Thrust Reverser Speed posted Fri Aug 31 2007 04:59:22 by Blackbird

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format