Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WS Caribbean Ops  
User currently offlineYXD172 From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 449 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

How many aircraft in WS's fleet are equipped with life rafts (vs PFDs) and how are these aircraft normally used in terms of Caribbean vs Hawaiian ops? I ask this because I noticed on my last flight with WS (SXM-YUL) that the aircraft was not equipped with rafts, and so we had to follow the islands/US east coast to get up to YUL, making the flight a solid 40 min late even with an on time departure.

I assume that this flight would've been scheduled for an overwater-equipped aircraft and that there was an equipment sub somewhere down the line?


Radial engines don't leak oil, they are just marking their territory!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCYLW From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

No rafts installed or required on the Caribbean flights. All of WS routes over the Atlantic are within 400nm of a suitable aerodrome.

All ETOPS flights have rafts.

The route you took back was either the most efficient that day or possibly had an MEL item that required the flight to have a longer route that day. Definitely nothing to do with rafts.


User currently onlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4765 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1595 times:

Quoting CYLW (Reply 1):
No rafts installed or required on the Caribbean flights. All of WS routes over the Atlantic are within 400nm of a suitable aerodrome.

There are two things required to fly through New York oceanic. (among other things). Life rafts, which would most certainly be required to fly SXM-YUL, and HF radios. Unless they had both, (and it sounds like they didn't), they would have to take the "long way" around.

The non-HF route takes you over Puerto Rico, then along the Turks/Bahamas to a point about 180nm north of NAS, then straight north to ILM, then to YUL, And ... about 40 minutes longer than a correctly equipped aircraft sounds about right. The non-life raft route would allow you in New York Oceanic, but only on the two furthest west airways.

As this is a very expensive way to do business, I would guess that it was an equipment substitution.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineCYLW From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1580 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 2):
There are two things required to fly through New York oceanic. (among other things). Life rafts, which would most certainly be required to fly SXM-YUL, and HF radios. Unless they had both, (and it sounds like they didn't), they would have to take the "long way" around.

I can guarantee WS does not have life rafts on WATRS flights. All WS routes in NY Oceanic are planned to avoid routes that require life rafts. L459 is as far east as you can plan without requiring rafts. All other routes meet the requirements assuming suitable aerodromes are available.


User currently onlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4765 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1572 times:

Quoting CYLW (Reply 3):
I can guarantee WS does not have life rafts on WATRS flights. All WS routes in NY Oceanic are planned to avoid routes that require life rafts. L459 is as far east as you can plan without requiring rafts. All other routes meet the requirements assuming suitable aerodromes are available.

Yes, that's what I see as well. Coming from SXM, the ideal route to YUL would involve flying over ANU then BDA, then north. And as you note, those two airways from ANU north, do not comply with the 400nm rule.

The route the OP described though, makes me thing the issue was not over-water equipment, but HF radios, as to enter New York Oceanic airspace, HF radios are required. Are all WS B737s HF radio/SELCAL equipped?



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineCYLW From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 4):
The route the OP described though, makes me thing the issue was not over-water equipment, but HF radios, as to enter New York Oceanic airspace, HF radios are required. Are all WS B737s HF radio/SELCAL equipped?

Yes I agree. Sounds like a routing to avoid HF. Likely stopped working enroute down to SXM and had to be deferred.

All but one of the 737s, and all of the 738s have HF


User currently offlineYXD172 From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 449 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

If it helps, here is the flight in question:
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/W...5/history/20121231/2115Z/TNCM/CYUL

According to flightaware, our flight was ~500km longer than WS' flight this past week
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/W...5/history/20130107/2115Z/TNCM/CYUL

So I guess it was just a matter of HF radios then? Looks like I was on FTWJ, this week the flight was operated by GTWS



Radial engines don't leak oil, they are just marking their territory!
User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2504 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1413 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting YXD172 (Reply 6):

IF you check WJ2884, the inbound from YUL, it only took 3.5 hours and went out over BDA and they more direct route. This points to probably having something stop working either inflight or maybe on the ground.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineYXD172 From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 449 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 7):

IF you check WJ2884, the inbound from YUL, it only took 3.5 hours and went out over BDA and they more direct route. This points to probably having something stop working either inflight or maybe on the ground.

Good catch! Thanks for the help everyone!



Radial engines don't leak oil, they are just marking their territory!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic WS Caribbean Ops
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ops Question For VS LHR-LAX-LHR posted Wed Dec 19 2012 08:01:13 by readytotaxi
Crew Bidding And Non-scheduled Ops posted Mon Dec 10 2012 01:16:07 by TWA772LR
Is The A380 Too Big For Airport Ops? posted Mon Jun 25 2012 14:56:59 by tommyy
Flight Crew On O2 In Normal Ops posted Thu Jun 14 2012 14:09:23 by smartt1982
Airline's 767 T/O & Landing Ops Specs posted Fri Apr 6 2012 15:39:27 by TSRA
Anybody In Easyjet Ops Here? posted Thu Mar 29 2012 10:19:08 by ajd1992
Questions About Charter Ops posted Tue Mar 27 2012 09:53:42 by redzeppelin
Air Cargo Ops: Empty Flights Into Asia? posted Fri Jan 20 2012 02:46:08 by faro
Easterly Ops At LAX posted Fri Nov 11 2011 20:10:24 by uclax
LHR T5 Gate Ops For NonA380 Aircraft posted Sat Sep 17 2011 18:00:19 by jgw787

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format