Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Where Is This 744's Left Winglet?  
User currently offlinecombatshadow From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 149 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 21620 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Just taking a look at the top 5 for the last 24 hours, and this beautiful pic caught my eye. But then I noticed something appears to be missing. I keep looking away and back at the picture wondering if it's an illusion. Can anyone shed any light on this?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paulo Santos - Aerospray




Bob
54 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineairportugal310 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3719 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 21625 times:

Definitely not an illusion.

Maybe removed for Mx. Or damaged on a previous flight. As others will elaborate, there was probably a fuel burn penalty. Maybe a payload penalty too?



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlinecalvo747 From Australia, joined Dec 2012, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 21562 times:

There was a discussion in a thread last week, I'm trying to find it. A QF 744 was flying minus a winglet apart from a fuel burn penalty, their was no other effect

User currently offlinecbphoto From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1572 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 21512 times:

Quoting calvo747 (Reply 2):
. A QF 744 was flying minus a winglet apart from a fuel burn penalty, their was no other effect

Would there be a small performance penalty as well with only one winglet?



ETOPS: Engines Turning or Passengers Swimming
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 21364 times:

Quoting cbphoto (Reply 3):
Would there be a small performance penalty as well with only one winglet?

Reduce takeoff/landing weight by 20,800 lbs, enroute climb weight by 10,000 lbs.

Tom.


User currently offlinefsnuffer From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 252 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 20456 times:

As a non-aviator I am curious, anyone care to elaborate what other external parts of the 747 are optional tha might be interesting or not widely know?

User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2372 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 20277 times:

Just to note, the A330 (and presumably the A340 as well) can also fly missing the winglet, with penalties of course:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Weimeng



User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2581 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 19894 times:

Quoting fsnuffer (Reply 5):
As a non-aviator I am curious, anyone care to elaborate what other external parts of the 747 are optional tha might be interesting or not widely know?

- flap track canoes are frequently popping up in the threads here. The flap track canoe is just the fairing of the flap movement mechanism and not a load-bearing part. There is AFAIK a 1% fuel burn penalty per flap track canoe missing.
- doors can be sealed shut, and emergency shutes can be removed for maintenance, but then there is a passenger capacity penalty. (I've been on such a RJ85 or RJ100 flight with LX.)

There certainly are many more items...

David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineharleydriver From United States of America, joined May 2010, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 19480 times:

Quoting fsnuffer (Reply 5):
As a non-aviator I am curious, anyone care to elaborate what other external parts of the 747 are optional tha might be interesting or not widely know?

There are a lot of items. A aircraft has an MEL (Minimum Equipment List) that lists items that are allowed to be inoperative and the restrictions or additional procedures that have to be followed and there is a CDL (Configuration Deviation List) that allows certain items to be missing and the penalties associated like planning an additional fuel burn or payload reductions.



Department of Redundancy Department
User currently offlinecambridgeflyer1 From UK - England, joined Jun 2012, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 18467 times:

Not forgetting a demonstrator A380 flew into HKG from BKK in 2007 with no wing fences at all. Does anyone know if the A380 would be capable of flying with one wing fence only?

User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3088 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 18273 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
Reduce takeoff/landing weight by 20,800 lbs, enroute climb weight by 10,000 lbs.

What would the numbers be for both missing?



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 18091 times:

Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 10):

Take off with more than one winglet missing is not allowed.

The fuel penalty for one missing is approximately 2.5% on the burn figure.

[Edited 2013-01-13 07:56:38]


Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 17772 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 11):
Take off with more than one winglet missing is not allowed

Is this a gov't rule or an OEM rule? Source?



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 17567 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
Reduce takeoff/landing weight by 20,800 lbs, enroute climb weight by 10,000 lbs.

Enroute and Climb penalties I can understand, but how come the MTO/LAM change so drastically? Can you explain?


Remember the LH A330 that clipped another aircraft on a US airport a couple of months ago? Mx took the winglet off and taped the wing, the aircraft flew back to Germany with a major delay obviously, but it flew.



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlinemigair54 From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 1924 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 16626 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 13):
Enroute and Climb penalties I can understand, but how come the MTO/LAM change so drastically? Can you explain?

Increase of drag created in the wintip, that´s exactly what winglets and sharklet reduce.

Quoting Semaex (Reply 13):
Remember the LH A330 that clipped another aircraft on a US airport a couple of months ago? Mx took the winglet off and taped the wing, the aircraft flew back to Germany with a major delay obviously, but it flew.

not long ago also an A330 in Zanzibar has the same issue, then wintip removed, put in the cargo hold and back to Italy.


User currently offlineaxelesgg From Sweden, joined Jan 2010, 191 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 15911 times:

Quoting fsnuffer (Reply 5):
View Large

Engine? Not optional when you buy it but maybe lose one when flying?


User currently offlinemigair54 From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 1924 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 15650 times:

Quoting fsnuffer (Reply 5):
As a non-aviator I am curious, anyone care to elaborate what other external parts of the 747 are optional tha might be interesting or not widely know?

they are not optional but some of them can be missing or U/S, that can be found in the CDL or the plane (configuration deviation list) with restrictions and penalties and deadlines to operate under that conditions.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 12):
Is this a gov't rule or an OEM rule? Source?

Manufacturers issue the documentation and aviation authorities aprove, amend, recommend changes or just deny, then airlines also issue the same or more restrictive amendments, but states don´t work in this small issues one by one.

Quoting calvo747 (Reply 2):
There was a discussion in a thread last week, I'm trying to find it. A QF 744 was flying minus a winglet apart from a fuel burn penalty, their was no other effect

QF is also one of the very few airlines that have flown the B747 with a fifth engine on the wings, that´s also a very special case and not everybody is able to do.


User currently offlinepacksonflight From Iceland, joined Jan 2010, 391 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 14672 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 12):
Is this a gov't rule or an OEM rule? Source?

This according to dispatch deviation guide, published by the manufacturer and approved by FAA/JAA


User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 62
Reply 18, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 14631 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 11):
Take off with more than one winglet missing is not allowed.

Since when?

747-400 Without Winglets! How Come? (by RootsAir Mar 13 2006 in Civil Aviation)



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlinecbphoto From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1572 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 14339 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 18):
Since when?

I think that's different! ANA and JAL domestic 747s never had the winglets installed, so obviously it would be ok to operate without them. I think what they were trying to say, is if the aircraft originally had winglets, and both had to be removed, then revenue service would not be allowed on that aircraft. I am guessing they could obviously ferry the aircraft empty to a maintenance base to have them repaired!



Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
Reduce takeoff/landing weight by 20,800 lbs, enroute climb weight by 10,000 lbs.

Thanks for the info!



ETOPS: Engines Turning or Passengers Swimming
User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 14249 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 18):
Since when?

Since the MEL/DDG for the type came out.

The -400D is a variant that has been specifically certified to operate without winglets, amongst others.

The 'regular' -400 was certified differently and its MEL clearly states that at least one winglet is required for dispatch. I didn't make it up.
The type is clearly able to fly without both, but if it came to that, the operator would need to seek a special temporary permit from Boeing and their domestic Civil Aviation Authority to deviate from the DDG.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 62
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 12886 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 20):
The 'regular' -400 was certified differently and its MEL clearly states that at least one winglet is required for dispatch.

Ah, okay, that makes sense. The winglets seemed to be interchangeable on the -400D, flying with them or without them, but if it's a different certification, then it's a different certification.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlinejetmech From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 2699 posts, RR: 53
Reply 22, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 12092 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
Quoting francoflier (Reply 11):
Quoting Semaex (Reply 13):

I think the weight penalties may be performance based only; thus, they become important for situations such as hot and high operations, short runways or elevated terrain surrounding the airfield.



Regards, JetMech



JetMech split the back of his pants. He can feel the wind in his hair.
User currently offlinersmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 8628 times:

Evergreen N492EV winglet was damaged while under Taxi in OTP (Romania) on 12/28/12 The wing marshaller was not paying attention while in a turn and the winglet hit a light pole.

The flight took a 10 hour delay and was on its way to DOV.

Yes all of you mechanics there is a penalty CDL for it missing.

I doubt it will be fixed with the financial situation EIA is in.

[Edited 2013-01-13 17:55:52]


Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
User currently offlineairportugal310 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3719 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8451 times:

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 23):

Well, what's costs more? Fixing a winglet or constantly taking a fuel burn penalty?

I should think the answer there is clear.



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlineUTAH744 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 208 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8592 times:

UPS can only fly with the right winglet or fence missing because they only make right turns.


You are never too old to learn something stupid
User currently offlinersmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 2
Reply 26, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8550 times:

Quoting airportugal310 (Reply 24):

What if you lines of credit are in the crapper????? and you have abused your relationships with the vendors.



Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
User currently offlinerahulrahul From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8742 times:

One time, I was on a LH flight to IAD on a 744, and a winglet was missing. It was intriguing me, and now I know the answer  .


A300/319/320/321/332/333/343/346 B732/738/744/752/762/763/772/773 CRJ200/700/900 ERJ140/145/170/175 MD88
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 28, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 8186 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 20):
The 'regular' -400 was certified differently and its MEL clearly states that at least one winglet is required for dispatch.

It can't be in the MEL, it would have to be in the CDL.

Tom.


User currently offlineairportugal310 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3719 posts, RR: 2
Reply 29, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 7992 times:

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 26):

I can't speak to the to the financial situation per se, but if someone is still allowing the company to buy jet fuel then it can't be all that bad.

But I see what your saying. A wing and a prayer can only get you so far...



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlinejeffry747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 963 posts, RR: 2
Reply 30, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 7398 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UTAH744 (Reply 25):

        

And they do have a knack for flying with missing flap canoes, too.



C'mon Big B, FLY!
User currently offlinezoneload From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 7301 times:

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 23):

The plane came back to the states turned and went out on another flight. Returned to the states then went to JFK to have the wing let replaced. So it flew one more round trip to the Middle East then it was fixed.


User currently offlinezoneload From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 7232 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 20):

The 747-400LCF have the winglets removed also.


User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2421 posts, RR: 2
Reply 33, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 6720 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting zoneload (Reply 32):
The 747-400LCF have the winglets removed also.

Does my memory fail me, or weren't those removed to resolve a flutter problem?


User currently offlineakelley728 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2194 posts, RR: 5
Reply 34, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 6697 times:

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 23):
I doubt it will be fixed with the financial situation EIA is in.

That's what insurance is for.


User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3848 posts, RR: 11
Reply 35, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 6003 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 28):
It can't be in the MEL, it would have to be in the CDL.

Oops, yes. It is indeed...


As for the cost factor above, considering a very average 10Tons/h burn and a 2.5% penalty, then it's about 250 kgs of fuel for every flight hour without it. A typical 12 hrs long haul would roughly cost an extra $5000 in fuel.

I don't know how much a winglet is and how many man hours are required to install one, I'm guessing more than $5000.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4866 posts, RR: 10
Reply 36, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 5979 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 35):
I don't know how much a winglet is and how many man hours are required to install one, I'm guessing more than $5000.

several hundred thousand I'd say.



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 37, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5760 times:

Quoting migair54 (Reply 14):
Quoting Semaex (Reply 13):
Enroute and Climb penalties I can understand, but how come the MTO/LAM change so drastically? Can you explain?

Increase of drag created in the wintip, that´s exactly what winglets and sharklet reduce.

Hold on a moment. There's a difference between "drag" and "drag".
The Induced Drag and the Parasite Drag are the two main values we're looking at when trying to decide whether to put winglets on an aircraft or not. If it were that easy to say that winglets reduce the drag, then why not put as much of it on every aircraft? Yet we don't.

Looking back at my ATPL stuff I now understand though why the MTO/LAM increase so much. For those who are interested:
Both Parasite and Induced Drag are functions of the speed of the aircraft. They are exponential respective inversely exponential to the TAS of the aircraft. So at low speeds (in Takeoff or Landing configuration) the Dp has a very low value while the Di is very high, even more so with flaps. While Winglets increase the value of the Parasite Drag by adding Form and Interference Drag to the aircraft, they also reduce the value of the Induced Drag, especially at high angles of attack. So the negative impact of the Dp is taken into consideration for the greater good, but at low airspeeds this value is so low (and the Di so high), that having one winglet missing to keep the Induced Drag low significantly increases the overall Drag of the aircraft, thus more Thrust (or less Mass) must be considered.
That also explains why aircraft which are large and cruise at relatively high Mach numbers (eg 777) are not in desperate need of winglets. The negative impact of the (large) Paraside Drag would destroy the (small) savings in Induced Drag.

Quoting jetmech (Reply 22):

Thanks for this great piece of information!



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offline135mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 412 posts, RR: 4
Reply 38, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5308 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rwessel (Reply 33):
Quoting zoneload (Reply 32):
The 747-400LCF have the winglets removed also.

Does my memory fail me, or weren't those removed to resolve a flutter problem?

As I recall from previous threads, they removed the winglets on purpose because of the drag they create for the heavy lifting of the longhaul flights was no longer needed on these models since they do not carry all of the weight of the passengers/bags etc, and now it's the "bulk" of the 787 size compared to the weight of passengers.

As I said, I remember reading that on here before, so please don't crucify me! LOL

Regards,
135Mecch


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10350 posts, RR: 26
Reply 39, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5026 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 37):
That also explains why aircraft which are large and cruise at relatively high Mach numbers (eg 777) are not in desperate need of winglets.

Not exactly. Winglets are most effective over cruise, since you have a lot of time over which drag savings can be gleaned.

If you look at widebody, medium/long-haul aircraft:

Airbus:
A300 - wing fences
A310 - wing fences
A330 - winglets
A340 - winglets
A380 - wing fences

Boeing:
747-400 - winglets
767 - retrofitted winglets, or raked wingtips on -400
777 - no winglets, or raked wingtips on -200LR, -300ER, and -F
787 - raked wingtips

So the majority of widebody, medium/long-haul aircraft from the two major manufacturers have some sort of vertical wing device from the factory or available for retrofit, whether technically winglets or wing fences.

The 767-400, the newer 777s and the 787 have raked wingtips, which is something better designed in from the start. If you can afford the extra span and structural weight, they are better than the equivalent winglet.



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 40, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4875 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 39):

I think you're making a good point here. The large aircraft have all rather small winglets/wingtips, compared to their overall size. Compare that with a 737NG or ERJ for example.
I think the reason is that widebodies spend more time in cruise than narrows, so the effect of the different kinds of Drags must be considered.
Like I said, the Induced Drag becomes very small with faster speeds, therefore less need in cruise.
If, however, the cruise is done at fairly low speeds, say M.72, resulting in high AOAs, then you desperately need winglets again to compensate for the rising Induced Drag.
That's the reason why operators retrofit their 767s. They cannot afford to fly faster because the fuel burn would be horrendous, but if they fly slow the Induced Drag must be compensated somehow - solution winglets.

The impact of actual winglets on an A380 for example would be quite negative. They would have to be so huge to make a difference, which adds tons of weight, that the aircraft is better without it. On top, the Parasite Drag (Form Drag) the winglets create (on every aircraft) become more of an issue with high cruise speeds, exponentially to the TAS.

The best solution for all aicraft would be retractable winglets. Maybe in a couple of decades we're there.



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17186 posts, RR: 66
Reply 41, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 40):
The impact of actual winglets on an A380 for example would be quite negative. They would have to be so huge to make a difference, which adds tons of weight, that the aircraft is better without it.

The A380 would do fine with winglets or raked wingtips. The reason for the fences is that it is wingspan limited to 80 meters. Fences are the most efficient way to get maximum wingspan and also wingtip devices.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 42, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4840 times:

Just a Thought....
On the B747......If one wingtip is damaged,It can be deffered with a load penalty.What If the other side Wingtip is also removed until both Wingtips could be replaced back, would the load penalty differ positively.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10350 posts, RR: 26
Reply 43, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4678 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 40):
I think you're making a good point here. The large aircraft have all rather small winglets/wingtips, compared to their overall size. Compare that with a 737NG or ERJ for example.

That wasn't my point.

Quoting Semaex (Reply 40):
If, however, the cruise is done at fairly low speeds, say M.72, resulting in high AOAs, then you desperately need winglets again to compensate for the rising Induced Drag.

If your airplane is designed to cruise at M.72, then there's no need for a high AoA. You optimize your airplane for its design cruise speed (of course with other inputs and compromises as well).



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlinebluewhale18210 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 237 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (1 year 11 months 20 hours ago) and read 4025 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 42):

Per the document provided above, only one may be missing. So take 5000kg roughly off the performance and its a go. If both are missing then its a no dispatch. If you already have one missing and the other one is damaged the aircraft is grounded.

Also normally aircraft don't fly with a damaged structural component. If that piece is deferrable it is deferred after it is removed. So you can't fly with half a winglet and call it good.



JPS on A300-600RF A319/320 B737-400/800 B757-200F B767-300F CRJ-200/900. Looking to add more.
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 45, posted (1 year 11 months 13 hours ago) and read 3939 times:

Quoting bluewhale18210 (Reply 44):
If both are missing then its a no dispatch.

What is the reasoning for this.....why not permit despatch & add a payload penalty.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2421 posts, RR: 2
Reply 46, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3757 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 45):
What is the reasoning for this.....why not permit despatch & add a payload penalty.

I suspect it's just because they've never gone through the work needed to certify that configuration. Losing one winglet has a reasonable probability - things run into aircraft wingtips on a fairly regular basis, after all. But losing both ought to be much rarer, and so is likely not worth the effort on the part of the manufacturer.


User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1938 posts, RR: 2
Reply 47, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3701 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 23):
Evergreen N492EV winglet was damaged while under Taxi in OTP (Romania) on 12/28/12 The wing marshaller was not paying attention while in a turn and the winglet hit a light pole.

Why would that be the fault of the ground if the plane was taxing, wouldn't the flight crew be responsible for not hitting a light post?

Quoting rsmith6621a (Reply 26):
What if you lines of credit are in the crapper????? and you have abused your relationships with the vendors.

We cant sell to them anymore as of June. Cash in hand only

Quoting francoflier (Reply 35):
I don't know how much a winglet is and how many man hours are required to install one, I'm guessing more than $5000

UA prices a 744 winglet at $36,000 and approx 36 hours to replace.



The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 48, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3698 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 47):
UA prices a 744 winglet at $36,000 and approx 36 hours to replace.

Why 36hrs.....seems a bit excess....



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17186 posts, RR: 66
Reply 49, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3690 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 48):
Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 47):
UA prices a 744 winglet at $36,000 and approx 36 hours to replace.

Why 36hrs.....seems a bit excess....

18 hours to replace. 18 hours to do the paperwork. 



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlinestrfyr51 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 1420 posts, RR: 1
Reply 50, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3649 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting combatshadow (Thread starter):

More than likely Damaged and placed on CDL deferral per the Config. Deviation List. Perfectly legal, We've done it a few times at United though the weight penalty is pretty STIFF.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 51, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3379 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 49):

18 hours to replace. 18 hours to do the paperwork.

If thats no joke, still 18hrs is a long time....shouldn't 4 hrs be realistic.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17186 posts, RR: 66
Reply 52, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 51):
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 49):

18 hours to replace. 18 hours to do the paperwork.

If thats no joke, still 18hrs is a long time....shouldn't 4 hrs be realistic.

It's a joke. Sorry forgot the winky.  



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2469 posts, RR: 3
Reply 53, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3128 times:

Quoting harleydriver (Reply 8):
A aircraft has an MEL (Minimum Equipment List) that lists items that are allowed to be inoperative and the restrictions or additional procedures that have to be followed and there is a CDL (Configuration Deviation List) that allows certain items to be missing and the penalties associated like planning an additional fuel burn or payload reductions.

Here is a link to the FAA's website that contains published MMELs.
http://fsims.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode=Publication&doctype=MMEL

The 747-400 MMEL is found here:
http://fsims.faa.gov/PICDetail.aspx?...d=3BD005974A01F31C86257A6B005CE055

.



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 54, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 52):

It's a joke. Sorry forgot the winky

Ok......
But what would be a realistic time frame for a Winglet relacement.



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Where Is This 744's Left Winglet?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Where In Kruger Park Is This Photo Taken? posted Wed Jul 2 2008 06:12:09 by Ambanmba
Is This A Combi 744? posted Wed Aug 23 2006 15:26:18 by Baw2198
Where At LAX Is This Plane Taxiing? posted Sat Aug 30 2003 03:39:05 by QANTAS747-438
Where Is The FA Emergency 744 Equip Placed? posted Mon Dec 4 2000 03:35:44 by Airnewzealand
What Is This Engine Sense Line Component posted Thu Dec 27 2012 09:13:40 by dhawald3
Is This Wake Turbulence Or "normal" Turbulence? posted Mon Oct 1 2012 09:25:39 by klemmi85
Is This Legal Or Not Unbelievable Thing To Do? posted Mon Sep 17 2012 02:46:37 by JumboJim747
What Type Of Aircraft Is This? posted Fri Jun 22 2012 22:32:51 by peanuts
Is This What 3 Degrees Nose Up Looks Like posted Mon May 28 2012 10:53:50 by smartt1982
Is This An-24 Startup Unusual? posted Sat Mar 10 2012 08:13:23 by RayChuang

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format