HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31201 posts, RR: 58 Posted (3 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2069 times:
Is there any history of a leaking Hydraulic system Heat Exchanger contaminating the fuel , as most of the modern Aircraft have the Hyd HE immersed in the wing fuel tanks.A leaking HE could cause hyd fluid loss and contaminate the fuel, this could damage the seal of the related fuel system not supposed to be in contact with hyd fluid.
Just a thought.
Anyone experienced something similiar.
planenut767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 59 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (3 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2002 times:
I have seen it on a couple of 777's where the initial report was fuel migration into the center tank. Upon further troubleshooting they found that one of the hydraulic lines near the center tank was leaking into the fuel tank, so they had to do all kinds of filter changes and system flushes once the leak was repaired. As far as that happening via a heat exchanger I haven't seen that yet, but I'm sure it's happened some where.
tdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 81 Reply 5, posted (3 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1999 times:
Quoting HAWK21M (Thread starter):
Is there any history of a leaking Hydraulic system Heat Exchanger contaminating the fuel , as most of the modern Aircraft have the Hyd HE immersed in the wing fuel tanks.
Yes. It can happen on multiple types, typically more of an issue when it's cold and the seals don't function as well. Provided the aircraft doesn't sit for a very extended period with a very low level of fuel, the dilution into the fuel is so high that it doesn't seem to cause downstream effect on the fuel side.
wingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 834 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (3 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1957 times:
I think fuel in the hydraulic fluid is more of a problem than hydraulic fluid in the fuel, but the latter is probably more common, although there are contamination tolerances for both fluids.
FAQ from the skydrol website says:
Q: What happens when fuel is contaminated by hydraulic fluid?
A: In laboratory tests, concentrations of up to 5% Skydrol in jet fuel were cooled to -30oF. No gel formation or any other effect was observed. 5% is the maximum concentration possible in the worst case of a leak in a fuel tank heat exchanger.
KC135Hydraulics From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 165 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (3 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1926 times:
I have seen this occur on the KC-135 quite a bit. Our fuel pumps for the body tanks, which feed fuel to the A/R manifold, are hydraulically operated and submerged in the fuel tanks. Occasionally the motor and/or its hydraulic lines inside the tank develop a leak. It will lead to quantity loss on the affected hydraulic system but it can be difficult to detect. When we suspect this, we can sump the fuel tank but due to the shear volume of fuel in these body tanks (upwards of 40k) the fuel samples are visually inconclusive. They can do burn samples but even those can be inconclusive. Eventually when the problem becomes intolerable the last resort is going in tank and it is then that you will be able to find your leak. As far as I am aware after the source of the hydraulic leak in the tank is found and corrected, there is no additional corrective action taken as far as the fuel system is concerned. It is understood that the residual hydraulic fluid that was intermixed with the fuel will just burn off. Jet engines can burn just about anything. I've never heard of fuel flushes/filter changes/decontamination for hydraulic fluid-contaminated fuel.
KC135Hydraulics From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 165 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (3 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1831 times:
Each HYD motor is flow regulated to 17 GPM at 3000 psi and there are 4 total A/R pumps. For an example I ran a mule today for a defuel and running one pump at a time was flowing 350 GPM of fuel into a truck. With 4 running that's 1400 gal/min. The size and wiring of an electrical motor submerged inside a fuel tank that could power a pump like that would be a major fire hazard. We don't have inerting systems for the body tanks. Hydraulic motors are safest in the fuel environment (and they sound great when they're screaming at max power)!
I've seen this on the 737 and the Airbus 320 series airplanes. we now recognize what we're looking at pretty quickly because it will most certainly ruin an engine by clogging up the engine's start nozzle spray pattern and turning it into a steady stream rather than a spray . You have to look at the trend pattern for Hydraulic servicing or on the airbus, loafing roll spoilers. unless it's a massive leak you might be chasing it down for matter of weeks before you find it. checking the fuel low level sump drain for contamination after a long layover (6-8 hrs) seems to help verify the problem. I use that as part of my isolation procedure and I've narrowed it down on 4 airplanes. (over 13 years) so it is not common but it is certainly NOT improbable either. but you have to take your time and document what you're looking at.