web500sjc From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 589 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (4 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1712 times:
Ill take a stab...
the maps pilots plan their flights on are sectioned off by true cardinal directions (north, south, east, west), and since this is done it is easier for pilots to take their plotters and find the true course, and is therefore easier to use wind measured in degrees based off of true north.
Magnetic heading is used because for most of the history of flying, the quickest and most reliable way of finding ones heading was a magnetic compass.
Just to clarify Course is the direction one goes over the ground, and Heading is the way one points in the air or water.
Mir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 19813 posts, RR: 56 Reply 2, posted (4 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1685 times:
Quoting web500sjc (Reply 1): the maps pilots plan their flights on are sectioned off by true cardinal directions (north, south, east, west), and since this is done it is easier for pilots to take their plotters and find the true course, and is therefore easier to use wind measured in degrees based off of true north.
It's not really easier, actually. Not harder either, just a different process. With the way things are now, you have to take your true course, apply the wind correction, then convert to magnetic. If the winds were in magnetic, you'd just covert your true course to magnetic first before applying the wind correction. Same result, just different order. Why they decided to do it that way I don't know, though it does make it easier to look at a map of the country and see which way the winds are really blowing in relation to the ground - in some areas the magnetic variation can lead to the numbers being 15-20 degrees off of the true values.
It should be noted, though, that this is only for winds aloft - METARs still report winds in magnetic values.
-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
Novice From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2012, 90 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (4 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1684 times:
Thanks for the reply web500sjc
I see the logic in what you're saying, though the maps that i plan from have variation lines running through them so therefore enables you to see magnetic heading from them, so i can't see the advantage of having wind in degrees true?
web500sjc From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 589 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (4 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1633 times:
Quoting Novice (Reply 3): I see the logic in what you're saying, though the maps that i plan from have variation lines running through them so therefore enables you to see magnetic heading from them, so i can't see the advantage of having wind in degrees true?
the variation lines do not point north, they just place a line upon which the difference between true north and magnetic north is known, and ascribe the known difference at that line.
Another point I had not brought forward, the magnetic north pole moves in relation to the true north pole, and so the maps would periodically change orientation so that magnetic north would still be at the top.
Starlionblue From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2004, 15904 posts, RR: 66 Reply 6, posted (4 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1632 times:
Quoting Mir (Reply 2): It should be noted, though, that this is only for winds aloft - METARs still report winds in magnetic values.
The way an instructor explained it to me is that (in the US), the rule of thumb is that "printed" products measure in true, while "voice" stuff measures in magnetic. The METAR is related to the ATIS, thus "voice".
So the winds aloft forecast is in degrees true, while the wind check from the tower is magnetic.
Another way to look at it is that it makes sense to have METAR/ATIS in magnetic since runway headings are magnetic. You use this number when close to the airport only. However for route planning true is more practical since maps use true directions, and as Mir says variation can be quite large.
If everyone still navigated by compass, having magnetic wind directions in the forecast would make sense. But most people don't anymore except as a last resort.
By the way with GPS becoming the preferred method even in general aviation, will we someday see runways with true headings?
[Edited 2013-01-28 17:04:33]
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - from Citadel by John Ringo
Novice From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2012, 90 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (4 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1589 times:
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 6): If everyone still navigated by compass, having magnetic wind directions in the forecast would make sense. But most people don't anymore except as a last resort.
Though most GA traffic navigate using the DI and that uses magnetic heading
SAAFNAV From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 213 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (4 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1564 times:
It comes from back then when people still plotted.
All your plotting is done using a protractor on a plotting sheet. You align that with the longitude lines, which all point to True North.
Then, using a Nav Log, you work out everything, from left to right, True Track, Wind Vector, Drift, Magnetic Variation, Deviation, and then you get Magnetic Heading.
If you had to plot using Magnetic Headings, everytime you put your protractor down, you would first have to find out the variation at your position, add or subtract from 360, align to Magnetic North and then plot your position or whatever. Obviously, this could lead to a lot of confusion, so it's far easier to just make on addition or subtraction afterwards.
Magnetic Winds are spoken on ATIS Recordings and by ATC for runways, since you land on magnetic. A wrong calculation in the critical phase could lead to unexpected crosswind components.
Starlionblue From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2004, 15904 posts, RR: 66 Reply 9, posted (4 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1483 times:
Quoting Novice (Reply 7): Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 6):
If everyone still navigated by compass, having magnetic wind directions in the forecast would make sense. But most people don't anymore except as a last resort.
Though most GA traffic navigate using the DI and that uses magnetic heading
I can only speak from my own experience, but if I needed to go anywhere beyond 10 minutes I flew with the GPS with pilotage as backup, DI as backup to that and whiskey compass as final backup. The DI was mostly useful for keeping track of things over a short distance (like holding a heading during a LOC approach). If (when) I turned the autopilot on I set it to follow the GPS.
In the G1000 planes I used the GPS 99.9% of the time, except when I had to do VOR/ILS/LOC approaches.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - from Citadel by John Ringo
glen From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 202 posts, RR: 2 Reply 10, posted (4 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1465 times:
Quoting Mir (Reply 2): It should be noted, though, that this is only for winds aloft - METARs still report winds in magnetic values.
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 6): The METAR is related to the ATIS, thus "voice".
That's not quite correct. Printed METAR (e.g. at the met office) are also in true values. Only ATC towers, ATIS and airport advisory service (real time reprts to flight crew) report wind as magnetic. See also this documentation (the only "official" publication I found in short time): www.uscg.mil/auxiliary/missions/auxair/metar_taf.pdf
"The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view." - Albert Einstein
Starlionblue From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2004, 15904 posts, RR: 66 Reply 11, posted (4 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1456 times:
Quoting glen (Reply 10): That's not quite correct. Printed METAR (e.g. at the met office) are also in true values. Only ATC towers, ATIS and airport advisory service (real time reprts to flight crew) report wind as magnetic. See also this documentation (the only "official" publication I found in short time): www.uscg.mil/auxiliary/missions/auxa...f.pdf
So there is a difference between ATIS and METAR values. Very interesting! Thx for info.
Also strengthens the "printed" vs "voice" rule.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots." - from Citadel by John Ringo
SAAFNAV From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 213 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (4 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1415 times:
Quoting glen (Reply 10):
That's not quite correct. Printed METAR (e.g. at the met office) are also in true values. Only ATC towers, ATIS and airport advisory service (real time reprts to flight crew) report wind as magnetic. See also this documentation (the only "official" publication I found in short time): www.uscg.mil/auxiliary/missions/auxair/metar_taf.pdf
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2012, 90 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 589 posts, 
From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2004, 15904 posts, 
From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 213 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 202 posts, 
From Canada, joined Jun 2004, 318 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
