flylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 721 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (2 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1208 times:
I think so. I noted that Piedmont operates both and I did not realize there were two. On FlightAware they show as DH8B AND DH8C. Three meters, that is quite a difference.
The Dash 8-200 simply has the engines of the larger -300 (albeit flat rated to the same max power setting of the -100 series´s engines) giving it a better hot and high performance compared to the -100 series next to a higher possible cruise speed.
DashTrash From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1314 posts, RR: 4 Reply 6, posted (2 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1015 times:
The -200 is higher powered and heavier than the -100, and also incorporates a couple of systems upgrades. Basically the engines are -300 engines, but derated. Not flat rated to the same max power as the -100. The derate is above the SHP of the PW120 on the -100s. I can't remember the actual numbers, but the -100 had a little over 1800 hp per side, and the -200 was over 2000. Performance was worlds apart. The -200 was fun to fly, the -100 was a pig.
PDT flights showing up as DH8B is an error. They don't have any -200s left in the fleet.
atct From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2035 posts, RR: 40 Reply 7, posted (2 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 941 times:
Quoting Yikes! (Reply 4): I've never heard of these designations.
These are the ICAO designators for the aircraft for ATC purposes.
We dont see anything but DH8A's up here (Era). I flew an old Henson / Piedmont bird a few weeks back on ANC-FAI. Looked good in her new clothes and the interior was well kept up. Would have no idea it was a 35k+ cycle airplane from the passenger standpoint.
atct
Real pilots fly planes that take and measure oil in gallons
DashTrash From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1314 posts, RR: 4 Reply 9, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 760 times:
Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 8): As for why they got rid of the -200s instead of the -100s I don't know. Hopefully somebody here can enlighten me.
Leases expired. I heard someone say there were tax reasons why the -200s couldn't be flown in the US again after the leases expired, but I won't swear that's the truth.
The last few -200s that went back are down in Columbia now.