Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
737 Quiet Wing Mod  
User currently offlineB727LVR From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 630 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3377 times:

I have recently heard some friends of mine talking about the "Quiet Wing" modification for 737-400's, vice using a winglet mod. I don't know know of any approved winglet mods for a -400, but I could be wrong. Do any of you know anything about the quiet wing? Good, bad, or indifferent. I would love to hear from those that have the -400 experience to see if this application would be good for any of the -400 variants (pax/combi/freighter). I know my pilot friends are a little skeptical, about it. Their biggest argument point is that if it was such a good thing, operators like Alaska, US Airways, or Southwest would be all over it, but to their knowledge each of them are trying to suck the flaps up in tighter to get the out of the air stream vice putting them out further into it. Would love to see what your thoughts and comments are on this.

Here is a link to the mod in question:

http://quietwing.com/performance-systems/


I'm like a kid in a candy store when it comes to planes!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4780 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 3328 times:

Looks like the opposite to me.


The article implies the flaps will be extended slightly more in cruise.


Don't see how that saves fuel but i'm no engineer..



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently onlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1648 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3265 times:

We are currently putting a couple 727's through the program, while not a 734, I also am wondering really how much difference it is going to make and if it is so good, why don't they all have it?


Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17174 posts, RR: 66
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3123 times:

Quoting Max Q (Reply 1):
The article implies the flaps will be extended slightly more in cruise.

Don't see how that saves fuel but i'm no engineer..

There were 727 crews who would extend the flaps 2 degrees since this apparently increased lift without increasing drag. They had the pull a CB so the slats wouldn't extend. Completely unauthorized of course.

This probably led to the incident with TWA 841 (the crew denied it). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_841_(1979)



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently onlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1648 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3106 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
There were 727 crews who would extend the flaps 2 degrees since this apparently increased lift without increasing drag. They had the pull a CB so the slats wouldn't extend. Completely unauthorized of course.

When the flaps go to 2 at that speed it apparently pitches the nose down just a little for less drag I guess that's why they did it. I'm still waiting for the differences chapter to look at and see what it does exactly.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlinemercure1 From French Polynesia, joined Jul 2008, 1724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

works similar to the Boeing 777 PIP. Drooped trailing edge devices to increase lift, for very minimal additional drag. Creates better L/D compared to clean wing, etc. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aer...03_09/pdfs/AERO_Q309_article02.pdf

User currently offlineFlyMKG From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 188 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3021 times:

We have one remaining QuietWing 722 in our fleet. It has both the flap droop and the winglets. The inboard flap droop makes the plane slightly more unstable than a Boeing wing plane. This is most noticable in cruise flight. The winglets seem to have no apparent fuel savings. They do however, make it a bit more challenging in a crosswing landing since there is more surface for the wind to hit.

In the 727 circle the QuietWing was the cheapest and least popular of the three hush kit options. (The other two being FedEx and Raisbeck.) I believe this was due to most thinking it messed with the "perfect" Boeing wing too much. It also has a severe performance hit on takeoff under most conditions. Very counterproductive.

With all that being said, in our fleet, the QuietWing airplane is far and away the easiest to fly compared to our Valsan planes. Everything happens at a much more controlled pace. It is a more civilized bird.

FlyMKG



Essential Power, Operating Generator.
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4780 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2971 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
There were 727 crews who would extend the flaps 2 degrees since this apparently increased lift without increasing drag.

Well that's nonsense.


Flaps 2 gives you extension of Slats 2,3,6 and 7 and certainly increases drag as will sticking anything out into the airflow.



Whatever that TWA crew did that night, whether inadvertent or deliberate it was not going to improve that Aircraft's performance.



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17174 posts, RR: 66
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2958 times:

Quoting FlyMKG (Reply 6):
The winglets seem to have no apparent fuel savings.

I think the idea is that the winglets increase climb performance, thus getting the aircraft out of range of NIMBY ears more quickly.

Quoting Max Q (Reply 7):
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 3):
There were 727 crews who would extend the flaps 2 degrees since this apparently increased lift without increasing drag.

Well that's nonsense.

Agreed that it would probably not improve performance, but the crew seemed to think it would.

See the first point on page 32 of the NTSB report:

"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17174 posts, RR: 66
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2952 times:

Man the posting engine is giving errors. Here's the verbiage:

While cruising at mach 0.816 and 39,000 feet pressure altitude and wuth the autopilot controlling the aircraft, an apptempt was made to extend 2deg of trailing edge flaps independently of the leading edge slats, probably in an effort to improve aircraft performance.

Source is the NTSB report which I can't link because it is breaking the post...



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 737 Quiet Wing Mod
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ice Cream Scoop On 737 Classic Wing Pylons? posted Sat Nov 10 2001 01:23:50 by SFOintern
737 Wing Anti Ice On The Ground? posted Thu Jul 12 2012 13:52:14 by smartt1982
Wing Size Comparison: E190/737 posted Sat Jun 5 2010 08:50:28 by flyboy80
737 Eyebrow Mod posted Sun Nov 26 2006 14:40:38 by ZANL188
Wing Differences 737 Classic To 737NG posted Tue Dec 13 2005 02:10:17 by Lnglive1011yyz
A Yellow "hole" On The 737 Wing posted Tue May 18 2004 23:31:59 by Tg 747-300
Black Stripe On UA 737's Wing posted Sun Nov 3 2002 04:47:14 by CcrlR
Curved Vortex Generators On 737's Wing? posted Tue Sep 17 2002 19:06:03 by Mr Spaceman
Wierd Way The Wing Flexed On An Airtran 737-2L9 posted Mon Sep 3 2001 02:34:26 by RC Pilot
737 Trim And Yoke Center Position posted Tue Apr 2 2013 06:00:36 by metamarty

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format