Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Extra 'hump' On Early B747's  
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4470 posts, RR: 19
Posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5379 times:

The early 747's /100 series and maybe some early /200's had an extra, small hump between the aft end of the upper deck and the fuselage.


Can't post it here so maybe someone can, anyone know what this was ?


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirvan00 From Australia, joined Oct 2008, 758 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5227 times:

I thought it was the covering for a small satellite dish or some othe communication device.

User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3070 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5126 times:

Here's a good photo of it here:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Unite...Airlines/Boeing-747-122/2223062/L/

Interesting question. I thought it was just part of the structure design, but we'll see if someone else knows differently. It's not the TCAS antenna since airplanes were not equipped with TCAS at the time that photo was taken. Best guess is it's just the way the structure was designed.


User currently onlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9616 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5126 times:

The only humps or auxiliary equipment on top of a fuselage that I know of is satellite communication systems, however the first satellite communication system for airplanes wasn't developed until 1987.

[Edited 2013-04-15 15:37:49]


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6704 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4755 times:

Satcom aerial

See remarks for


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Fitzgerald




wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4470 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4542 times:

Don't understand how it could be a Satcom Antennae fairing as satellite communication was in its infancy when the B747 rolled out in 1969.


The same year Neil and Buzz landed on the moon.


Seems very hard to believe.



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineLTC8K6 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 1209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4500 times:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/0827209/L/

I think it's pretty clearly some sort of instrumentation/radio/INS pod.

Hump:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/0952818/M/

Hump gone a few years later:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/0244094/M/


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4470 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4461 times:

Could be for an Antennae I suppose, it is a very large fairing but I guess that's what you would expect for that era and the level of technology being used.


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineLTC8K6 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 1209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4440 times:

IIRC, it was for an early system that never really "took off".

User currently offline7BOEING7 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 1553 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4104 times:

Quoting Max Q (Reply 5):
Don't understand how it could be a Satcom Antennae fairing as satellite communication was in its infancy when the B747 rolled out in 1969.

Yes, it was in it's infancy, that's why the "hump" didn't last long and was removed a few years later.

See the following thread:


What Is On This United 747-122? (by flightsimer Feb 6 2013 in Civil Aviation)?threadid=5683076&searchid=5683110&s=747+hump+satelite#ID5683110


User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2434 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4048 times:

Quoting 7BOEING7 (Reply 9):
See the following thread:


What Is On This United 747-122? (by flightsimer Feb 6 2013 in Civil Aviation)?threadid=5683076&searchid=5683110&s=747+hump+satelite#ID5683110

Which in turn references this thread:
What's This Little Hump On The 747? (by Alphafloor Jul 22 2006 in Tech Ops)



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineBravoOne From United States of America, joined Apr 2013, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

Talking to some old timers at Boeing and they say that this first appeared on Line #05, TWA. Don't bet the farm on the accuracy as they are really old timers.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Extra 'hump' On Early B747's
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Extra Door On 737-900 posted Fri Aug 3 2012 10:06:36 by B777UA
What Is This Hump On The 77W? posted Fri Oct 8 2010 15:00:07 by c5load
Why The Extra Door On This 767 And Not This 767? posted Thu Apr 1 2010 18:39:46 by c5load
Rules For Needing Extra Crew On Board posted Wed Dec 30 2009 14:03:38 by Ryand36
Headphone Jacks On Early Airliners posted Mon Jun 15 2009 16:43:47 by AirframeAS
What's This Little Hump On The 747? posted Sat Jul 22 2006 18:48:45 by Alphafloor
Why The Extra Bogie On DC10-30? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 22:00:40 by SK909
Extra Surcharges On Flights posted Mon Mar 21 2005 11:44:26 by AMSMAN
FE On Early A300 posted Mon Jun 21 2004 22:54:25 by LMML 14/32
What's On That B747 Nose Gear? posted Thu Mar 18 2004 01:40:34 by Radarbeam

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format