Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lavatory Economics Question  
User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 800 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6139 times:

Recently I was on an early UA 757 that has the old chemical flush commode. It struck me that when the aircraft went in for heavy maintenance there should be a real savings to replacing these with the more modern high pressure low flow commode.

The new technology should be lighter (less fluid), take up less space, and I suspect is simpler thus requiring less maintenance. Over time there should be a significant ROI to replacing the old commodes.

But of course with aviation there is always a catch and I am curious what that catch is.

- Is it technically feasible to replace them?
- If it is, is there a savings to doing so?
- If there is, is there a regulatory issue (certification)?

Has any carrier done it?


...are we there yet?
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinecornutt From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 338 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6140 times:

I know that on the newer Boeings, those rely on a central vacuum system that is installed at manufacture. (A side benefit is that it allows operators to move the heads and galleys around.) I assume it would be a major job to retrofit an older a/c with the vacuum system.

User currently offlineFlyHossD From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 838 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days ago) and read 6099 times:

Quoting flylku (Thread starter):

Recently I was on an early UA 757 that has the old chemical flush commode

I suspect the cost of the change wouldn't be recovered before the plane is retired from UAL.



My statements do not represent my former employer or my current employer and are my opinions only.
User currently offlineRoseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9488 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6044 times:

I think the reason it isn't being done is cost. Every modification has to have a payback. It is easier to justify modifications to improve dispatch reliability or improve customer satisfaction, than ones to marginally improve fuel burn through weight savings.

Re-plumbing all the lavatories is a massive undertaking. Replacing all the blue water lines with vacuum tubes is an extensive modification that requires taking the whole interior if the airplane apart. Water and waste lines running the length of the fuselage require taking a large amount of stuff off the airplane to access.

The vacuum system is centralized, so the cargo compartment waste tanks need to be replaced which again is a significant modification. The weight savings from the waste water is partially offset by the vacuum system.

As for certification, you are going to have to find someone to create the new system and certify it. It is expensive, but doable. Boeing will do it, but they are extremely expensive. Few airlines have the in house engineering staff to get such a modification approved. It is definitely doable, but expensive.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Lavatory Economics Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Beginner's Question - Aircraft's Economics posted Thu May 1 2008 18:28:30 by WunalaYann
Very Short 737-800 Flight Question posted Wed Apr 17 2013 03:44:48 by aerdingus
777 Lighting Question posted Tue Apr 16 2013 07:54:11 by Garpd
A320 Winglet: Flight Control Law Question posted Tue Apr 2 2013 05:36:55 by flyinTLow
Wing Paint Question posted Wed Mar 27 2013 03:23:24 by na
JAL 763 Rejected Takeoff -deflated Tires Question posted Thu Mar 21 2013 16:59:33 by Viscount724
Delta Airlines "Ready Reserve" Question posted Thu Mar 21 2013 10:35:19 by chicago757
747-8 Center Panel Question. posted Wed Mar 20 2013 13:19:29 by Karamara
Airline Management Question posted Mon Mar 18 2013 17:20:27 by kenny1688
Airport Shutdown Question posted Sat Mar 16 2013 00:52:41 by 1400mph

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format