Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cruise Wind Vs. ToC Wind In CDU  
User currently offlinekrisyyz From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1614 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3462 times:


The 737's PERF INIT page calls for a CRZ WND entry, do most airlines use the average wind component or the top-of-climb wind?

Would a pilot ever leave the CRZ WND section blank and manually enter the winds for each waypoint on the legs page instead?



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinewoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1190 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3436 times:

I'm not sure about the 737, but in my aircraft if you enter leg winds, it overrides what you enter in crz winds. When you enter the crz wind it populates that wind info in each leg of the cruise portion of the flight plan.

It's just an entry to help the FMS determine ETAs and compute vnav climbs and descents. It uses a blended solution for winds. At your current location it uses actual winds and as you get further down the flight plan it weights the leg winds/ crz winds more heavily.

A few pilots put in leg winds for each leg, but most pilots I fly with just put in the crz winds and I just choose the strongest headwind or the lightest tailwind that I can find on the flight plan to make the FMS give me the worst case performance.

Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlineCosmicCruiser From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2268 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (3 years 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3373 times:

The FMS I flew required the headwind wind/tail wind component to be inited but then we would up load the forecast winds for about 4 or 5 altitudes on longer flights to add more accuracy . There would be no reason to just leave it blank, it won't hurt anything. If you add the forecast winds manually or uploaded that will override the cruise component. I believe I remember correctly that the FMS is also looking at actual winds as well.

User currently offlineglen From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 270 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (3 years 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3354 times:

On short haul (A320) flights we are/were usually happy with the average head- or tailwind component which we entered at FMS initialization.

On longhaul flights this gives you a good estimate for the ETA at the beginning of the flight, but not for enroute estimates. Once you pass zones with different wind components, the ETA becomes unreliable as well. In order to have better enroute estimates as well as a reliable ETA, we were entering average wind for legs - each about one hour length (MD11, A330/340).
A few years ago we started entering wind data for all enroute waypoints with a considerable change in wind direction and/or speed at four different levels. This enables the FMS to calculate a optimum level not only depending on weight but also on different wind at different levels. This helped to save fuel by flying more on optimum levels but was quite a bunch of data which had to be entered.

Quoting CosmicCruiser (Reply 2):
but then we would up load the forecast winds for about 4 or 5 altitudes on longer flights to add more accuracy

Luckily we have this feature now as well.

"The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view." - Albert Einstein
User currently offlineCosmicCruiser From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2268 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (3 years 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3303 times:

Quoting glen (Reply 3):
Luckily we have this feature now as well.

Yeah, amazing how much faster it is!!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Cruise Wind Vs. ToC Wind In CDU
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tandem Rotors Vs Conventional Design In Helos posted Wed Jul 8 2009 04:20:56 by Steman
DC-8-60 Vs -70: Differences In Performance? posted Tue Mar 17 2009 14:10:15 by Happy-flier
Cruise, Drop Of Tail Wind = Aircraft Overspeed posted Mon Apr 30 2012 15:57:39 by smartt1982
Landing Easier In X-wind posted Wed Dec 5 2007 07:00:20 by Flipdewaf
Airport/airliner Higher-speed Climbs In Rough Wind posted Mon Nov 5 2007 23:14:52 by QantasHeavy
Entering Wind Direction/Speed In FMS Question posted Sun May 21 2006 13:21:09 by JulianUK
Landing 747 And 777 In Strong X-wind! posted Sat May 11 2002 02:21:57 by Jzucker
Influence Of Wind On Cost? How About Africa? posted Mon Feb 11 2013 06:31:12 by Vinniewinnie
Airline In House Fueling VS Contract Fueling posted Thu Feb 7 2013 05:46:30 by HermansCVR580
Varying Wind Speeds/direction And Tailwheel Limits posted Sun Jan 27 2013 09:17:35 by smartt1982

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format