Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Did Boeing Really Correct The 787 Battery Problem?  
User currently offlinerjsampson From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 75 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3689 times:

Here's an article on ANA cancelling a flight based on an engine start problem:


What struck me about it was the article's description of Boeing's fix for the batteries (which according to the article, are only used in the 787. Didn't realize that). It described a way of containing an overheat through insulation, steel cage protection, and fume venting. But nothing from the article (granted, a Yahoo! sourced article) that suggests that they corrected the underlying overheat problem.

So, did Boeing actually fix what caused these modern, energy dense batteries to overheat?

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinenomadd22 From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 2142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3584 times:

They never narrowed the cause to an exact root cause. So, they used the shotgun approach. Tighten manufacturing controls, modify the charger, tighten the current and draw limits and modify monitoring. Then, they changed the container to prevent problems if a single cell did overheat, despite all the other precautions. The container keeps the cells separate so one bad one won't cause others to go, is strong enough to contain any battery incident and provides for venting gas overboard.
Just enter "Boeing" and "battery" into Google and you'll find way more than you ever wanted to know.

[Edited 2013-06-12 03:56:31]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Did Boeing Really Correct The 787 Battery Problem?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The 787 The Last Airliner Without Bleed Air? posted Wed Jan 30 2013 06:20:48 by a380900
Tech/Ops Discussion Of The 787 Grounding posted Tue Jan 22 2013 09:59:21 by CM
Landing Gear Length On The 787-10 Inadequate? posted Fri Nov 16 2012 16:35:34 by Max Q
Field Repairs To The 787 posted Sun Jul 1 2012 08:56:40 by traindoc
How Would Food Taste On The 787? posted Fri Apr 27 2012 11:53:51 by bikerthai
What Is That Scope On The 787 ZA002 Tail? posted Sun Oct 23 2011 11:52:18 by ferpe
The 787 Weight, How It Got There posted Mon Sep 26 2011 09:27:21 by ferpe
Should Boeing Have Lunched The 763-246C? posted Wed Aug 24 2011 10:26:56 by 747400sp
Single-slotted Flaps On The 787 posted Sat Aug 13 2011 08:40:52 by happy-flier
Do Patents Held By Airbus Or Boeing Really Matter? posted Mon Aug 2 2010 12:01:43 by A380900

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format