B747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17187 posts, RR: 10 Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2787 times:
Going though my logbook i am trying to figure out whether N409AW is a CRJ200ER or LR version. Planespotters.net lists is a 200ER version while ch-aviation.ch lists it as a 200LR version. I don't know how I should log the bird.
Larshjort From Guinea-Bissau, joined Dec 2007, 1566 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2765 times:
IIRC there is no physical difference between the two, only the MTOW. I have found the same problem logging CRJ's, so I just stay with 1 source for all the aircraft.
All photos here on A.net is marked as a 200LR.
simairlinenet From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 931 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2571 times:
I have the same problem with CRJs. It's very frustrating. Fortunately, my source (jp-airfleets) does break apart ERs vs. LRs. It lists Air Wisconsin as having both -200ERs and -200LRs and shows N409AW to be a -200LR. (Only two -200ERs, both ex-Midway.)