Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
OZ 777 Crash Investigation: Fuel Handling?  
User currently offlinemoriarty From Sweden, joined Jan 2006, 190 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3885 times:

Following the OZ 777 crash at SFO I came across a thought that I never before have pondered about.

I assume that there's plenty of fuel in the tanks of that airplane, or at least a significant amount of it. How does the investigators deal with this? I guess they do some investigation on site and need to be assured of their safety meanwhile. At some point the wreckage is moved to a hangar for further analysis. I can't think they want to bring fuel tanks not emptied or somehow neutralized into the hangars.

How does it work? Do they try to drain the tanks? I guess they also want to do as little as possible that might affect the parts thus preventing the investigators from discovering things relevant to the investigation.


Proud to part of www.novelair.com.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSAAFNAV From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 289 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3855 times:

In the preliminary investigation, the officer will make a judgement as to fuel was likely a main contribution, and judge accordingly.

In any event, fuel samples will be taken and must ALWAYS be stored in glass container.
Where wing tanks etc are ruptured, the fuel will flow everywhere. J-A1 is fortunately not highly combustive/explosive as is AVGAS, so the odds of accidental ignition is greatly reduced.

Preservation of evidence is paramount for any investigator, but the safety of the personnel and the wreckage before any more evidence is destroyed, supersedes that.

So, if enough representative samples has been taken, tanks may drilled open (with a hand drill) so that fuel can drain away, or be pumped out. The ARFF will also be on standby, and use their normal procedures to prevent environmental damage.

As a side note, one of the founding fathers of the Southern California Safety Institute also preached that during wreckage recovery, your wreck WILL get damage, and the damage will be restricted to the area you are most interested in.

Erich



On-board Direction Consultant
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

I'm certain they pumped out/ drained the fuel Saturday overnight or Sunday morning.

Unless the tanks are completely intact with absolutely no fractures, leaks or damage - and then I still believe the tanks would be empty by now.

The documentation of the wreckage which used to take investigators several days, can be done now in just a very few hours with modern cameras and video equipment.

The last crash - USN T-2 - I had to document in 1978 - we took over 4,000 pictures of the crash scene. It took HOURS.


User currently offlineSAAFNAV From South Africa, joined Mar 2010, 289 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3818 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 2):


The documentation of the wreckage which used to take investigators several days, can be done now in just a very few hours with modern cameras and video equipment.

Also with hand-held GPS recorders to map each piece and superimpose on a satellite image. TWA800 took months to map out.



On-board Direction Consultant
User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2843 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3692 times:

I'd add that if any fuel leaked out of the tanks before the plane was moved they likely will have to do a site cleanup. Meaning, they could have to dig up all the contaminated dirt and dispose of it at a licensed facility. Sometimes that means incineration. There may be some concerns because the site is so close to the Bay.


The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlinemoriarty From Sweden, joined Jan 2006, 190 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3422 times:

Thank you for the kind and informative answers. Pretty much what I'd expect but when in doubt, ask.  

I guess there's always a balance between safety and preservation of evidence, bur that security always have precedence.



Proud to part of www.novelair.com.
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3313 times:

From KGO TV in San Francisco - Friday morning

Quote:
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (KGO) -- Overnight, thick smoke could be seen from site of the Asiana Airlines plane wreckage at San Francisco International Airport. The thick white smoke could be seen as crews worked to move debris from the plane. ABC7 News is now being told there was no fire, just heavy smoke caused by metal friction as crews cut the plane into smaller pieces.

Earlier this week an SFO spokesperson discussed that hazards crews would face in the cleanup. "We expect that there is going to be a lot of hazardous materials, jet fuel and hydraulic fluid that needs to be cleaned up in the area," said SFO Spokesperson Doug Yakel.

The fuselage of the plane was removed from the runway and work has started on repaving the runways and fixing the light system damaged in the crash.

So the fuel might not have been removed until last night.

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?sec...on=news/local/peninsula&id=9170280


User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2843 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3245 times:

This being California, I would not be surprised as I said that they will require a future runway shutdown to clean up fuel that leaked into the soil. Now that we know some was still on board as late as yesterday.


The beatings will continue until morale improves
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic OZ 777 Crash Investigation: Fuel Handling?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
777 Crash At LHR. Auto Exit? posted Thu Jan 17 2008 09:46:40 by Gospelle
BA 777 Incident With Fuel Door Open! posted Fri Jul 30 2004 14:32:23 by WindowSeat
Fuel Burn As A Function Of Fuel Consumption 777-LR posted Thu Jan 10 2013 16:32:32 by iwok
Fuel Efficiency Of Boeing 777-300 posted Thu Jun 28 2012 00:00:40 by celestar
How Much Fuel Does A 777/330 Burn? Pls Help posted Sun Oct 2 2011 15:07:16 by kevin
Boeing 777 Fuel Consumption posted Tue Jun 15 2010 02:41:26 by dkramer7
Minimum Fuel Advisory On 777 posted Sun Dec 20 2009 05:28:13 by VikingA346
777-300ER Towed To Gate To Save Fuel? posted Tue Dec 15 2009 16:30:20 by RayChuang
777 Fuel Capacity - How Much? posted Sat Aug 1 2009 13:56:28 by Mozart
Fuel Consuption 777 Vs. 330/340 posted Fri Aug 8 2008 05:10:37 by UA933

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format