Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Only 2 Hours Of CVR Data?  
User currently offlinewhiplash From India, joined Nov 2011, 38 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4235 times:

Why is the minimum requirement for CVR recordings only 2 hours compared to the FDR, which records upwards of 25 hours?

Is it cause the CVR data is heavy, and the equipment cannot record more?
Or is it cause CVR data older than 2 hours, would not be more helpful in case of a crash/incident?


 

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7345 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4003 times:

The CVR two hour time frame likely came from equipment limits back when they were real tapes used to record data.

Some folks object to recording more voice data because they don't think it is ever relevant to investigations. Some CVR data has been used by airline management to 'spy' on pilots in the past. There is also a concern about a desire by airline management to 'grade' pilots based on who is the most efficient fliers based on FDR data.

Those are some of the reasons to objections against recording more than two hours.

There is not technical reason modern digital CVR devices which store the data on solid state chips (similar to a thumb drive) could not record more.


User currently offlineN747PE From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3958 times:

The truth is crash investigators can only listen to just so much snoring     

User currently offlinepilotpip From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3139 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (9 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3763 times:

Modern ones usually record much more than 2 hours.


DMI
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 4, posted (9 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3548 times:

Why would you need more? It is very unlikely an accident will unfold for more than 30 minutes. Japan Airlines 23 was an exception but they had contact with ATC.

I suppose the DFDR needs longer recording times because something can be wrong with system in a latent fashion.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (9 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 3346 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 4):
Why would you need more?

Good question. In the event of an accident/airframe loss/crash then 30 minutes is more than sufficient. The problem with 30 minutes comes with a serious event that happens on a commercial flight that requires a detailed investigation by the relevant authority. This serious event could happen at any stage of flight and whilst requiring investigation may not result in the CVR 'ending' at the point in time that said event occured. Just as a random example an airline stalling on final approach and subsequently recovering. Flight Data Monitoring would pick up the event but unless the crew took action to preserve the CVR the data may be wiped by the time the aircraft's engines are eventually shut down. In my opinion the CVR length of recording should be of a suitable length to cover the length of any sector flown, I don't see it is a major difficulty to implement and certainly if there is a significant event any CVR could be 'fast forwarded' to the appropriate point without the need to trawl through hours of laborious and inane chatter from the flight crew!


User currently offlineKaiarahi From Canada, joined Jul 2009, 2797 posts, RR: 27
Reply 6, posted (9 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3180 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 4):
Why would you need more?

AF447 is an example. A longer recording may have given an indication of why the crew was so dysfunctional (i.e. interpersonal relationships). This is probably true of many CRM incidents.



Note à moi-même - il faut respecter les cons.
User currently offlinegolfradio From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 714 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (9 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3105 times:

I guess the only accident where the investigating authority wished for a longer CVR recording was the QF32 one. In that case engine #1 could not be shut down and the CVR continued recording and erased the recording during the incident. I believe they expressed the wish only for the purposes of understanding ideal CRM practices and noted that this did not have any bearing on the actual investigation.

User currently offlinecelestar345 From Hong Kong, joined May 2013, 19 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 1):
Some folks object to recording more voice data because they don't think it is ever relevant to investigations. Some CVR data has been used by airline management to 'spy' on pilots in the past. There is also a concern about a desire by airline management to 'grade' pilots based on who is the most efficient fliers based on FDR data.

If my memory serves me right, Once the engines are off and park brake set CVR data can be erased in the cockpit via a pushbutton on the overhead panel...


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31568 posts, RR: 57
Reply 9, posted (8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2375 times:

Quoting celestar345 (Reply 8):
If my memory serves me right, Once the engines are off and park brake set CVR data can be erased in the cockpit via a pushbutton on the overhead panel...

True....But a DGCA Mandatory mod has required that the erase circuit card be disconnected to avoid erasure.

On the OP.......2 hrs is adequate as it will be used to investigate an Accident/Incident only.



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Only 2 Hours Of CVR Data?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
The 767-200-Why Only One Wing Strobe? posted Fri Sep 10 2010 18:25:26 by c5load
Why The Change Of Call Sign/flight Number? posted Fri Aug 6 2010 00:53:41 by MSJYOP28Apilot
Legal Prescriptions Re Archiving Of Flight Data posted Thu Jul 2 2009 02:25:52 by Faro
Why No Transmitting FDR/CVR's? posted Mon Jun 1 2009 18:27:28 by TOLtommy
TCAS - Why Only Vertical Directions? posted Fri May 29 2009 04:08:55 by Superhub
Why Rear Windows Of Airbus Aircraft Slope Upward posted Sun May 24 2009 17:53:44 by Flaps30
Why The Nose Of A321 Like This? posted Thu Apr 16 2009 19:54:36 by Vietsky
Why Only 2 Thrust Reversers On The A380? posted Fri Apr 11 2008 18:41:17 by UltimateDelta
Why Only Tails Painted On New Aircraft? posted Thu Jan 24 2008 12:56:19 by Deaphen
Why Two Kind Of Airlerons On 777? posted Tue Sep 11 2007 20:47:57 by Claude

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format