Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Largest Aircraft With Non-Retractable Gear  
User currently offlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1379 posts, RR: 23
Posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6827 times:

Did a quick google search but couldn't find anything.
What would be the largest aircraft with a non-retractable gear system? C208? There has to be something bigger yet.

Cal   


*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6816 times:

Twotter is my nomination:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Svido Stanislav



Too bad 2H4 is too busy these days to actively participate in these discussions   



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlinevzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 834 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6794 times:

ANT-20?
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/mt/flightglobalweb/blogs//aircraft-pictures/2008/05/16/ANT-20bislarge.jpg



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6346 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6717 times:

Quoting vzlet (Reply 2):
ANT-20?

   That is something that 2H4 would totally have come up with! Good one!



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29792 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6685 times:

Beat me too it Vzlet.....almost but same plane of thought.

But I think I need to blunt out that ANT-20 had a big brother with an additional pair of motors mounted in a pod over the fuselage.

It was flow as a propaganda machine and was destoyed when an idiiot flying an escorting I-16 fighter (for size comparison) decided it would be cool to loop the loop around the wing.....he didn't make it.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17003 posts, RR: 67
Reply 5, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6646 times:

Quoting vzlet (Reply 2):
ANT-20?

You, Sir, win the Internet...

Quoting L-188 (Reply 4):
It was flow as a propaganda machine and was destoyed when an idiiot flying an escorting I-16 fighter (for size comparison) decided it would be cool to loop the loop around the wing.....he didn't make it.


To be fair this was the third loop so he was at least trying to miss 2/3 of the time.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24921 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6548 times:

Quoting FighterPilot (Thread starter):
What would be the largest aircraft with a non-retractable gear system? C208?

Some C208s have retractable gear.  
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Fast



User currently offlinedstc47 From Ireland, joined Sep 1999, 1463 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (11 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 6313 times:

The Ju 52 is pretty big too. Once very common, still a few active.

User currently offlineKPWMSpotter From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 433 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (11 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 6137 times:

How about the Blackburn Beverley? Double bogie mains hanging out in the breeze...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Blackburn_Beverley_C.1_XB289_47.V_Blackpool_10.06.57_edited-2.jpg



I reject your reality and substitute my own...
User currently offlineneutrino From Singapore, joined May 2012, 605 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 6087 times:

Quoting vzlet (Reply 2):
ANT-20?

For sure that plane is bigger than the Kalinin K-7 though on another vein, the latter's landing gear assemblies look to be larger.



Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis
User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3477 posts, RR: 67
Reply 10, posted (11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 6078 times:

How to measure biggest?

In terms of wing span and length, it's the ANT-20.

In terms of MTOW and power, it's the Beverly.

In terms of poor utility and technological dead ends, Both.



Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29792 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 6071 times:

Actually come to think of it, did the Messchermit Gigant have fixed gear?


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7694 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 6058 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KPWMSpotter (Reply 8):
How about the Blackburn Beverley? Double bogie mains hanging out in the breeze...

What a great plane. The gear probably wasn't worth retracting, given that the plane looks like it would cruise roughly about as fast as I can walk anyway.  



✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2425 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 6051 times:

How about the Kalinin K-7?
See photos in Reply #26 in this thread: Biggest Wing? (by RussianJet Aug 20 2013 in Tech Ops)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinin_K-7
http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=Russian+Kalinin+K-7

[Edited 2013-08-29 09:34:58]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C_8GGhY6kA


[Edited 2013-08-29 09:37:31]


Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineboeingfixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 529 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (11 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 6042 times:

Quoting OldAeroGuy (Reply 10):
In terms of MTOW and power, it's the Beverly.

If we are talking in terms of all aircraft in general, the Mil V-12 has the Beverly beat by about 100,000 lbs. and 11,400 horse power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-12

Ciao,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3477 posts, RR: 67
Reply 15, posted (11 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 6017 times:

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 14):
If we are talking in terms of all aircraft in general, the Mil V-12 has the Beverly beat by about 100,000 lbs. and 11,400 horse power.

Good point. Didn't think about the helicopter side of aircraft.

Also fits into the poor utility and technological dead end category.



Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17003 posts, RR: 67
Reply 16, posted (11 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 6009 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 11):
Actually come to think of it, did the Messchermit Gigant have fixed gear?

Yepp. Pretty sure it did. Much lighter than the Beverly in any case.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineKPWMSpotter From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 433 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (11 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 6003 times:

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 14):
If we are talking in terms of all aircraft in general, the Mil V-12 has the Beverly beat by about 100,000 lbs. and 11,400 horse power.

Ah yes, the aptly named "Homer" (Homer Simpson perhaps?). I knew the V-12 was huge, I never realized it was that huge (comparing those numbers to the Beverley).



I reject your reality and substitute my own...
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2316 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (11 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 5949 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting vzlet (Reply 2):
ANT-20?

The NASA Helios Prototype HP01/03 would at least beat the ANT-20 in terms of span (247ft vs. 206ft).


User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6689 posts, RR: 11
Reply 19, posted (11 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 5923 times:

If it had ever been built, this would have won hands down, I'd expect.

http://www.aviastar.org/helicopters_eng/mi-32.php

They must have had fun times in the Mil design department.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlinebohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2675 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5754 times:

Quoting FighterPilot (Thread starter):
There has to be something bigger yet.

This is the landing gear of the Hindenburg:

http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4fa442e1eab8ea3d54000002-1200/in-1936-the-hindenburg-made-many-transatlantic-flights.jpg


User currently offlinelarshjort From Denmark, joined Dec 2007, 1434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (11 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5653 times:

Quoting bohica (Reply 20):

This is the landing gear of the Hindenburg:

If we go by MTOW we are in the other end of the scale.

/Lars



139, 306, 319, 320, 321, 332, 34A, AN2, AT4, AT5, AT7, 733, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 146, AR1, BH2, CN1, CR2, DH1, DH3, DH4,
User currently offlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1379 posts, RR: 23
Reply 22, posted (11 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5543 times:

Ok, lets split this into catagories.
Largest size by MTOW, Aircraft size, currently in commercial service for both pax and cargo ops.

Cal   



*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
User currently offlinerlwynn From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 1075 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (11 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5414 times:

C-212



I can drive faster than you
User currently offlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 4392 posts, RR: 76
Reply 24, posted (11 months 9 hours ago) and read 4764 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have another candidate : The Messerschmitt 323 Gigant.
Can't upload images due my pàhbucket trouble, but see the GGANT
At 44 t it beats the Ant 20, though a bit smaller in dimensions.



Contrail designer
User currently offlineatct From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2275 posts, RR: 38
Reply 25, posted (10 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4677 times:

http://ambidextrouscivicdiscourse.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Spruce-Goose.jpg

No gear to retract....

[Edited 2013-09-05 23:51:41]


"The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing." - Walt Disney
User currently offlineclydenairways From Ireland, joined Jan 2007, 1228 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (10 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4607 times:

The Boeing 367-80 was also fitted with multi wheel non-retracting undercarriage, for flight tests as part of Boeing's bid for the CX-HLS program in 1964.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Largest Aircraft With Non-Retractable Gear
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
QF17/18 SYD-EZE-SYD With Non-ER 744s? posted Fri Dec 23 2011 22:42:18 by Shnoob940
A380 Orignially Design With Quad Nose Gear? posted Sun Feb 20 2011 16:10:31 by 747400sp
Iata Codes For Aircraft With Retrofitted Winglets posted Sat Nov 20 2010 14:43:30 by workhorse
Equiping An Aircraft With PTV? posted Fri Sep 26 2008 17:45:26 by Qwame
Largest Aircraft That Can Use Burbank posted Sun Aug 17 2008 01:39:41 by Davico68
Type Rating For Aircraft With Different Engines? posted Sun Jul 27 2008 21:31:44 by EmSeeEye
Aircraft With Multiple Powerplant Choices posted Tue Jun 10 2008 21:34:41 by Rigo
ATC Callsigns For Aircraft With Alphabetic Regs posted Tue Feb 12 2008 09:33:42 by N353SK
A320 With 4-Wheel Main Gear posted Wed Dec 5 2007 17:07:23 by 747Dreamlifter
Stored/Parked Aircraft With Flaps Extended? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 04:59:56 by Warreng24

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format