LZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 104 posts, RR: 0 Posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3264 times:
I realize this could easily be a MASSIVELY stupid question, but my curiosity is stronger than my shame, so here it goes: Is it mere coincidence that the APU outlet of the new Bombardier CSeries looks almost identical to the one on the A380? Are there different APU-outlet-design-philosophies? And if so, what's the reason for some of the out of the usual APU outlet positions and designs, such as on the 777, the CRJ200 or the MD11?
Fabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1245 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3256 times:
It's all a tradeoff between drag, ease of access, ease of manufacture...
777 for example utilizes screwdriver like tail for aerodynamics efficiency. With 787, Boeing decided that they could make a tip exhaust in such a way, that aerodynamic inefficiency was less of a burden compared with its drawbacks.
The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
LH707330 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 1343 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3146 times:
The bent exhaust duct on the 777 caused a bunch of problems, the cone is higher drag with simpler design, and the MD-11 has a side exhaust, which IIRC is less safe for rampers. My guess is that the CSeries/380 tail is the best compromise of these considerations.