Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No Spoilers Landing  
User currently offlineFoxRomeo From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 16 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6535 times:

Apologies if it's been discussed before, but I couldn't find anything in the search..

I've just come across this video from 2012 of a Jet2 757 making a 'spoiler-less' landing in Madeira. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv_3BXr4AXQ The video cuts away a few seconds after nose gear touchdown, but according to the title neither spoilers nor reverse were used.

This is something that I've never seen before and was wondering what your thoughts were?

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinemusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1093 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6440 times:

They forgot to arm the spoilers as part of the landing checklist?


Lufthansa Group of Airlines
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 6248 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

... Or perhaps the spoilers were on MEL? (much more likely)


DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
User currently offlinemusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1093 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6081 times:

Will they MEL this item when they go to a place like this with a short runway?


Lufthansa Group of Airlines
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6019 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

If you can get performance numbers for it then certainly.


DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 5962 times:

Don't see any 'evident' problem with the landing? Maybe had slight problems lining up at first (crosswinds?) but the landing itself looks to have been just about perfect - 'both wheels together,' and they don't appear to have needed any excessive braking to get down to turn-off speed in plenty of time?


Quoting FoxRomeo (Thread starter):
This is something that I've never seen before

Not 'getting at you,' pal, but which bit of it have you never seen before, FoxRomeo? Looks like a routine landing to me?

PS - should maybe add that (in my VERY limited experience) use of spoilers is an option, depending on conditions (like a really short runway?)- not any sort of 'requirement' for all landings. Any pros following this discussion, by all means correct me if I'm wrong?

[Edited 2013-09-28 05:25:11]


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4303 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5832 times:

The passengers were able to walk off the plane and the were able to use the plane again right? Well then there doesn't seem to be a problem with the landing. I don't know what else you would need to know.


Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7381 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5697 times:

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 5):
PS - should maybe add that (in my VERY limited experience) use of spoilers is an option, depending on conditions (like a really short runway?)- not any sort of 'requirement' for all landings. Any pros following this discussion, by all means correct me if I'm wrong?

Oh for the days of old when engines were cheap to repair and fuel price was peanuts, those landings with full flaps, spoilers, massive reverse thrust and brakes which required etiquette was that you brace for landing to avoid leaning forward, or holding your stomach after take off when they fully retract the flaps causing that sinking feeling, oh for the good old days.  

On a serious note, as others mentioned, they could have forgotten to arm the spoilers, or the pilots said let's do without them since it was a clear day, the runway long enough, probably a light load. It does appear to be windy so with more flaps the a/c would be much slower and more affected by the wind, crabbing may have been required.
Note also that on take off there does not appear to be much flaps.
Of course we are also taking about a 757, so.........


User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12521 posts, RR: 35
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5670 times:

I don't know for certain, but I would be surprised if spoilers were not included in any MEL list. I doubt if many pilots would want to land at an airport without having spoiler assistance; Madeira is a notoriously difficult runway with strong and unpredictable winds too.

One of the major factors in the Lufthansa A320 crash WAW in 1993 (?) was the spoilers not being armed.


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5055 posts, RR: 43
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5647 times:

The spoilers will still deploy with idle reverse thrust selection, even if not armed.

And they will also deploy, with thrust at idle with weight on the main gear if armed.

So .. they were not armed, and as reverse was not selected, they did not deploy unarmed. That is a very strange way to land an aircraft in a warm climate. I would be curious to know why that decision was made.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6926 posts, RR: 76
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 5514 times:

Quoting musapapaya (Reply 3):
Will they MEL this item when they go to a place like this with a short runway?

2631m total length and 2981m threshold to threshold isn't exactly short.

No spoilers and no reversers to me point to an Air/Ground sensing problem/fault. It prevents spoiler and reverser application but does not affect the anti-skid function, braking or autobraking function. The 757 autobrake system can be active regardless of Air/Ground sensing as long as throttle position is at idle or reverse and the wheels have spun.
According to the 757-200 QRH, landing on flaps 30 with Air/Ground Logic in Air Mode, with 85 tons landing weight you need only 1082 meters (with max manual braking), this includes 300m of air distance for passing the threshold at 50ft. For dispatch with A/G stuck in Air (Dunno if dispatchable, I don't have the MEL), the minimum runway required for dispatch becomes 1805 meters.

Assuming it's dry, zero wind... if wet... the runway available is enough (can't be f-ed to calculate it all).



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7714 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 5441 times:

Quoting brilondon (Reply 6):
The passengers were able to walk off the plane and the were able to use the plane again right? Well then there doesn't seem to be a problem with the landing. I don't know what else you would need to know.

There's nothing wrong with the question. People are used to seeing the spoilers deploy on landing, so why on earth would there be any problem exploring the issues relating to using or not using them?



✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlineKC135Hydraulics From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 312 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5428 times:

Isn't braking effectiveness heavily affected by spoiler deployment? I remember reading about this during the accident report on that AA MD-82 that crashed in the late 90s due the spoilers not being deployed. The difference in weight supported by the gear and the wing when spoilers are not deployed is most certainly in favor of the wing, leaving the brakes very ineffective.

User currently offlineFoxRomeo From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5414 times:

I never said there was anything 'wrong' with the landing, as some of you seem to suggest.

I merely stated that I've never seen an airliner land without spoilers before, and wondered why it would have been the case on the above occasion.

In fact I don't know of any reason why a PIC would choose not to use them, even IF you didn't 'need' them. They decrease lift and increase drag, surely that's what one would want for landing to ensure maximum braking efficiency??


User currently offlineBoeing77w From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 206 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5301 times:

Although not the 757, the 737 Flight Crew Training Manual published by Boeing talks about different landing techniques and the affect they can have on landing distances. On a Dry runway it states that not using the spoilers and thrust reverse, classed as improper landing technique, can increase required distances by as much as 1165ft/355m.

Spoilers aren't included in the MEL.

Currently sat with three other pilots all from different airlines. We all think along the same lines and have SOPs that would prohibit us from landing without the use of the spoilers or idle reverse. Doesn't matter how long the runway is. Certain aircraft such as the Embraer 170-195 don't even give you the choice to land without spoilers.

[Edited 2013-09-28 16:15:16]

User currently offlinecomairguycvg From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 337 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5213 times:

Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 12):
Isn't braking effectiveness heavily affected by spoiler deployment?



That's right. When the spoilers pop up, not only do they add drag to help slowing down, but they also add downforce to the wing which helps the mains get planted down more firm on the runway which helps increase braking effectivness.


User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1638 posts, RR: 20
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5186 times:

Three possibilities, as I see it:

-Autospoilers on MEL and were not immediately deployed manually upon touchdown,
-Autospoilers were armed but failed to deploy, or
-Autospoilers were not selected due to a failure to complete the before landing checklist or some pretty poor (IMO) aeronautical decision-making.

At most airlines landing without spoilers whatsoever is not permitted and/or very poor technique...though I do think their name is pretty appropriate seeing as they're great at "spoiling" a butter-smooth touchdown. 
Quoting Boeing77w (Reply 14):
Spoilers aren't included in the MEL.

True - the actual spoilers themselves have no MEL relief, but most airplanes can be dispatched without autospoilers (Boeing calls it the Auto Speed Brake system), provided certain conditions are met. This is probably what YYZatcboy meant.



B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4659 posts, RR: 19
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5142 times:

Good chance the Captain forgot to arm the autospoilers. They will deploy as soon as the reverse interlock is activated however and we cant see if that happened as the video is too short.


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineBoeing77w From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 206 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5059 times:

Quote:
True - the actual spoilers themselves have no MEL relief, but most airplanes can be dispatched without autospoilers (Boeing calls it the Auto Speed Brake system), provided certain conditions are met. This is probably what YYZatcboy meant.

Good point.


User currently offlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6926 posts, RR: 76
Reply 19, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 4931 times:

Does anyone know if a 757 can be dispatched with an "Air/Ground Logic stuck in Air" ?
No spoiler and no reverser cowls opening does seem to point at this problem.



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4870 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

Quoting Boeing77w (Reply 14):
Spoilers aren't included in the MEL.
Quoting N243NW (Reply 16):
This is probably what YYZatcboy meant.

Yes that's what I meant. Thanks!



DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4659 posts, RR: 19
Reply 21, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4818 times:

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 19):
es:

Does anyone know if a 757 can be dispatched with an "Air/Ground Logic stuck in Air" ?

To my knowledge this cannot be done and you wouldn't want to try, there are a lot of functions tied into this, not just thr spoilers and reverse, pressurization for example and many others.

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 19):
No spoiler and no reverser cowls opening does seem to point at this problem.

Disagree, just forgetting to arm the spoilers would explain them not deploying normally, you can't tell reverse wasn't used later in the landing roll as the video is too short, furthermore spoilers would have activated with idle reverse actuation



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineboeingfixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4749 times:

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 19):
Does anyone know if a 757 can be dispatched with an "Air/Ground Logic stuck in Air" ?

This is a definite -No Go- item if it's failed in air mode.

Quoting mandala499 (Reply 19):
No spoiler and no reverser cowls opening does seem to point at this problem.

Highly unlikely due to the architecture of the air/ground sensing system on the B757. To me it looks like either the auto speedbrakes were not armed or there was a failure of the system prior to landing and they were not manually deployed. Also the clip is too short to indicate whether the thrust reversers were used or not.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlinemandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6926 posts, RR: 76
Reply 23, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4675 times:

Quoting boeingfixer (Reply 22):
This is a definite -No Go- item if it's failed in air mode.

Yes, I agree. Unfortunately we didn't see the enough of the landing roll either as others have said. I originally came up with the numbers just to see whether it was possible to land over there with it stuck in Air mode.



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic No Spoilers Landing
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Overweight No Flaps Landing posted Sun Jun 8 2008 02:57:29 by Flexo
Why No Spoilers? posted Wed Oct 5 2005 06:30:59 by HighFlyer9790
RE: Flight OS111 No Engine Landing: Procedures? posted Mon Jan 5 2004 16:01:19 by Klm-md11
No T/R On Landing posted Tue Dec 23 2003 23:46:44 by Mlsrar
No-slats Landing In A 707-320C? posted Fri Dec 12 2003 21:19:27 by Happy-flier
Why No Main Landing Gear Doors On The 737? posted Sat Sep 23 2000 22:57:00 by Starship
Approach, And Departure, No Landing. posted Fri Sep 2 2011 17:41:27 by WarRI1
No Landing Clearance: When To Go Around? posted Wed Mar 9 2011 03:29:54 by Dainan
Why Are There No Aural Warnings During Landing? posted Sun Oct 10 2010 11:01:26 by aerobus12
Spoilers Deployed after landing? posted Sat May 30 2009 21:11:25 by BalZ18
Overweight No Flaps Landing posted Sun Jun 8 2008 02:57:29 by Flexo
Why No Spoilers? posted Wed Oct 5 2005 06:30:59 by HighFlyer9790
RE: Flight OS111 No Engine Landing: Procedures? posted Mon Jan 5 2004 16:01:19 by Klm-md11
No T/R On Landing posted Tue Dec 23 2003 23:46:44 by Mlsrar
No-slats Landing In A 707-320C? posted Fri Dec 12 2003 21:19:27 by Happy-flier
Why No Main Landing Gear Doors On The 737? posted Sat Sep 23 2000 22:57:00 by Starship
Approach, And Departure, No Landing. posted Fri Sep 2 2011 17:41:27 by WarRI1
No Landing Clearance: When To Go Around? posted Wed Mar 9 2011 03:29:54 by Dainan
Why Are There No Aural Warnings During Landing? posted Sun Oct 10 2010 11:01:26 by aerobus12

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format