Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Antarctic Etops  
User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 4095 posts, RR: 50
Posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5092 times:

After reading the thread about AR dropping their Argentina - Oceania routes, and QF / LA possibly adding additional frequencies, and the role 2-engined planes play in the market, and the limitations of the different ETOPS regulations (180, 240, 330...) and the cost of certifying aircraft or deploying 4-engined planes or flying detours...

all of this got me thinking...

wouldn't it be feasible for a couple of those (maybe even competing) airlines, maybe with some government subsidies, to just build a runway with just a minimum of facilities, station some employees there (again just the bare minimum to keep the airport serviceable). Right in the middle of that black spot. Sorry for borrowing this map from the other thread:

Yes I now you can't just build a runway in the middle of Antarctica since it's all glaciers and snow, but maybe along the coast, or one of the very southern Pacific islands. Like Peter 1 Island? Or is this part of the world really completely inhospitable? I see there is a UK research base at Rothera. http://goo.gl/maps/h1qUW If this runway was lengthened to the minimum length an A330 or B777 needs, wouldn't that pretty much cover that black patch on the map?

I was wondering if the profit could maybe outweigh the cost.


All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5044 times:

No, just no.

I love the out of the box thinking, but this would be so widely impractical on so many levels (you can't even land a small charter/cargo plane in Antarctica for most of the year because of the darkness/weather, never mind a 300 seat commercial jet).

The costs would be enormous (at least 4-5 times the cost of maintaining a similar airport on dry land, simply because of the isolated position) and were talking about a market that will be lucky to be served by 3 daily flights over the next 15-20 years.

We're more likely to see EDTO/ETOPS restrictions eased (with conditions specific to trans-Antarctic flights) than to see airlines/governments attempt a commercial airport in Antarctica (none of the existing airports even meet ICAO standards as they are!).

User currently offlineKuja From Bermuda, joined Aug 2013, 80 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5021 times:

An interesting idea, but, as outlined above, impractical on many levels. The ultimate Antarctic route is possibly EZE-PER, which obviously needs to happen as soon as possible   

[Edited 2013-11-15 00:08:35]

User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2740 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4937 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Birdwatching (Thread starter):
I was wondering if the profit could maybe outweigh the cost.

You're talking about a multi-billion dollar outlay for an airport to serve as a diversion airport for a tiny handful of flights. Even worse, no airliner is certified to operate in the conditions you find in the Antarctic winter. Actually I'm not sure any aircraft is - temperature in the interior drop to less than -80C semi-regularly. So even if you had an airport in the interior, you couldn't actually use it. Along the coasts things are a bit warmer, but subject to a considerable frequency of severe weather (the interior during the winter tends to have considerable wind and blowing snow too, although not much precipitation). So if you actually needed a diversion airport in Antarctica, you'd need more than one to get reasonable odds of one having sufficiently clear weather for use as a legal alternate.

Far cheaper just to run a longer route for that handful of flights.

User currently offlineroseflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 11166 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4864 times:

ETOPS 330 is a much more realistic and practical solution. Air New Zealand has been pushing for it and developing it with the 777s.

If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Question About Antarctic Etops
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About AN/APG-66(V2) posted Fri Sep 13 2013 15:54:44 by Googles
Question About Aircraft Windows And Safety posted Tue Sep 10 2013 14:26:42 by JBAirwaysFan
Question About Wing Flex. Newer Aircraft Vs Old posted Sat May 25 2013 15:00:18 by TrnsWrld
Question About Dispatch And FL posted Thu Apr 25 2013 09:42:13 by igorland
Question About Hot Brakes posted Tue Mar 12 2013 05:33:04 by av8orwalk
Question About DL CHS-JFK Inbound? posted Sun Feb 10 2013 10:23:42 by mesaflyguy
Tech Question About "rigging" A Broken Plane posted Thu Jan 17 2013 18:18:47 by United727
Question About Approach Speeds. posted Fri Nov 16 2012 13:05:51 by CDreier
Question About VOR Approaches posted Wed Nov 14 2012 19:02:38 by rolypolyman
Question About Routing (air And Ground) SEA-DEN posted Sat Oct 27 2012 14:42:53 by rcair1

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format