Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fedex & UPS Use Larger Planes  
User currently offlineNotar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1741 times:

Why Dont companies like FedEx or UPS Use large Cargo planes? like Ilyushin Il-76TD or Antonov An-124-100 Ruslan or the GALLAXY I dint think i ever seen a FedEX or UPS jet come here lager then a airbus or a 767

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

Fed-ex used to operate 747's, they got them when they sacked Flying Tigers. They will also lease them when they need the extra capacity.

UPS has a very large 747 fleet.

UPS just got MD-11's and FDX has been a big MD-11 operator for years.

Those military designed freighters are just too costly to run. This is because of sacrifices that where made to the efficency of the design, so that the aircraft could fullfill it's military mission.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineKAL_LM From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 497 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1618 times:

and besides...do you really need an AN-124 or IL-76 to haul small package freight?

Could you imagine the fuel surcharge that would be needed to keep thoses beasts in fuel?

 Big thumbs up

Regards,
Tom



is that a light at the end of the tunnel or just a train?
User currently offlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1383 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

Plus its a Russian built aircraft, we will never buy a Russian built aircraft. If they were to buy an aircaft like that it would be a Lockheed C-5 or Boeing C-17.


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

Besides Soviet-phobia and the fact that the Il-76 has been banned from the US due to noise restrictions (or so they say Big grin ), there are actually more practical reasons for FedEx, UPS and others not to use the An-124 and the Il-76. For example, the fact that it takes more flight crew members (6 for the Ruslan!) to fly it=more money, unfortunately Soviet/CIS a/c, especially those designed for the military are not known for great fuel efficiency. Also, Soviet/CIS a/c don't have rollers on their floors, therefore it would force a carrier based on US and European a/c to use different containers on those a/c, or use forklifts (or the a/c's own cargo loading systems) to load and unload the freighters. I'd imagine that certification would also be somewhat of an obstacle.

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineN1641 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1586 times:

as far as I know No one has any military transports other then the military for some reason, why I dont know, cost? not allowed to? dont see why it would be the second its not like a C-5 is dangerous for say me and you to own like a fighter would be.

User currently offlineNotar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

I figured if the GOVERMENT used them Why dont those Cargo companies use them type too .But like you say the cost is up there for it to ever pan out.

I herd FEDEX and U.P.S. are merging.

They are going to call it FEDUP



(joke)


User currently offlineExnonrev From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 621 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

It's not for lack of trying. Lockheed tried marketing the C-141 as the L-300 in the mid-'60s. The C-141 still has an FAA Type Certificate, despite the fact that none have ever been owned by anyone other than the US Government.

Lockheed also tried selling the C-5 as the L-500. Pan Am had shown some interest, but the 747F made much more sense. More recently, McDonnell Douglas proposed a civilian version of the C-17 called the MD-17. It bombed for the same reason as the civil C-141 and C-5. The operating costs are simply too high.


User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

As an aside to what Exnonrev said, Boeing is still considering marketing the C-17 as a BX-17 i think it is.

Anyway, on their website http://www.boeing.com somewhere, dunno if there are any takers yet, still something they are kicking around......



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineJsuen From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/pd/bc17x/index.html

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fedex & UPS Use Larger Planes
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
FedEx Or UPS Timetables posted Mon Jan 12 2004 20:56:57 by Macmac76
BizJets & Airliners Use Same Engine? posted Fri Mar 22 2002 21:15:14 by Mr Spaceman
UPS & FedEx Hours Necessary? posted Wed May 12 2004 19:44:34 by Aa777jr
Funny Or F&*(@$# Up Write Ups..... posted Fri Nov 24 2006 03:02:17 by Zvocio79
UPS/Fedex Question posted Thu Oct 5 2006 04:15:07 by AirWillie6475
Ditching By The Use Of Autopilot & Autothrottle posted Thu Sep 1 2005 23:23:22 by MerlinIIIB
A&P's At UPS posted Sat Feb 12 2005 09:49:26 by RiffedAAMech
Autopilot & A/T Use During Approach? posted Wed Apr 21 2004 22:24:00 by Mr Spaceman
UPS/FedEx Flight Engineers posted Thu Mar 11 2004 15:03:20 by DFWJIM
Entry Requirements For initial flying job in UPS or FEDEX? posted Thu Dec 25 2003 06:30:55 by Tarzanboy

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format