Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Falcon Vs Gulfstream  
User currently offlineAlee From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 63 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 21522 times:

Which one is better as far as operating cost, performance, and if anyone happen to have the prices too, let me know.. A F900Ex, GV or G4SP...

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineNotar520AC From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1606 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 21498 times:

Well, I like both, and I don't feel like digging through stuff right now, not that I could, because my room's a mess, but I do know from off the top of my head a new Falcon900C costs somewhere around $35 million. Gulfstream has a better range, I think and is more fuel effecient (correct me if I'm wrong) than the Falcon. You can visit their websites, http://www.falconjet.com and http://www.gulfstream.com for more information and specs. You can also write to their sales department for more in depth information. I've gotten a lot of the sales depts. of both.

BMW - The Ultimate Driving Machine
User currently offlineNormalSpeed From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 21491 times:

Uhmm... I like both.

User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 21489 times:

It's very difficult to assign operating cost to aircraft such as these; there are so many variables that have a direct effect on the final costs. Factors such as annual flight hours have a large effect because there are certain indirect costs that you incur regardless of the time it is flown. Fuel cost is also a factor, but not a much of one as you might imagine. However, there are several fuel co-ops that most operators of this class of bizjet belong to get fuel volume discounts. They say that hindsight is 20/20 and that's really about the only way you can accurately arrive a true operating cost. Anything else is, at best, an educated guess. Granted, every manufacturer publishes figures, but there are so many caveats as to make them practically meaningless. Bottom line is this - if you have to ask, you can't afford one.  Big grin

As for which one is better, that's a little like asking which is the better car - a Cadillac or a Lincoln? All of these airplanes will have competitive performance numbers. But it all really boils down to which one "floats your boat.” That fact that one or the other might have 300 NM more range or perhaps cruise .02M faster is, essentially, meaningless in the real world. If you needed an airplane in this category, you could safely choice any one of them and not get into very much trouble. (I’m also including the Global Express and Challenger 604 in this group.) “You pays your money and you takes your choice.”

Personally, my favorite would be the 900EX or the newly announced Falcon 7X (Essentially a competitor to the GV and Global Express.) Why? Just because I happen to like it the most. The Gulfstreams are real performers, but with all of that thrust they ought to be. The Falcons have virtually the same performance, but they achieve it with more “finesse”, if you will. Personally, for our operations I would much rather have the 3 engines. In my opinion, for extended over-water operations, three Garretts (or Honeywell, or Allied Signal or who ever they are this week) trump 2 Rolls Royces any day of the week. Oh well, I’ve got to go eat dinner.


User currently offlineGWB From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 21460 times:

I flew 900 and GIV before my current ship. As jetguy says, they're pretty much the same though the 900 does offer better field performance and for sure many owners like the security of 3 engines. However, maintenance costs are higher on the 900. A used 900EX (they're not made new anymore) will set you back around 30m, a GIV SP around 22-25m and a GV around 30m.

User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 21459 times:

I just got back from NBAA's IOC last month. Falconjet hosted a luncheon for everyone. Let me assure you that they are still building the 900EX. (At least they were sure trying to sell new ones.) Perhaps you were thinking of one of the earlier 900 variants? I also think that your numbers for used G-IVs and Vs might be a bit soft. The runway performance of the Falcon 50 and 900 are legendary - almost like having a turbojet-powered Super Cub. Oh well, perhaps someday...


User currently offlineJetpilot500 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 78 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 21457 times:

This link will provide you with operating costs and performance data for most corporate jets:

Gulfstream V:
$1,233 Direct Costs per Hour
$482,345 Fixed Costs per Year
200,000 Miles = 468 Hours

Gulfstream IV:
$1,556 Direct Costs per Hour
$494,631 Fixed Costs per Year
200,000 Miles = 466 Hours

Falcon 900EX:
$1,328 Direct Costs per Hour
$449,585 Fixed Costs per Year
200,000 Miles = 472 Hours

Hope this helps,

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Falcon Vs Gulfstream
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fuel/Cost Per Seat: 737 Vs. Widebodies? posted Fri Dec 15 2006 05:01:09 by DfwRevolution
74x Vs. 34x posted Wed Dec 13 2006 19:59:41 by Frequentflyer
Vzrc Vs Vso: Attn. Bellerophon posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:45:39 by Redcordes
Aircraft Vs Race Cars: Temps, Wear And Tear, Etc posted Thu Nov 2 2006 07:34:20 by TimePilot
DC-8 Vs 707 Today posted Tue Oct 31 2006 05:49:17 by DLKAPA
Falcon HTV Hypersonic Project Update posted Fri Oct 27 2006 15:12:44 by Lumberton
Airport Design - Arrival Vs. Departure Floor posted Wed Oct 25 2006 05:08:15 by Abrelosojos
Dassault Falcon Thrust Reverser posted Sat Oct 21 2006 16:24:55 by Corsair2
HF Vs VHF Vs UHF R/T Frequencies Useage posted Fri Oct 20 2006 08:28:34 by BOACVC10
757 Vs 767 posted Tue Oct 17 2006 23:57:59 by Freight400
Take Off Run Vs Altitude. Rule Of Thumb? posted Sat Feb 11 2012 16:41:57 by a380900
JT9D Vs PW4000 posted Thu Jan 19 2012 14:44:24 by Reggaebird
Concrete Vs Asphalt Runways posted Thu Jan 19 2012 11:05:44 by apodino
Fuel Consumption Window Vs Window Less A/c posted Fri Feb 21 2014 03:50:55 by Owleye
737-200 Vs MD80 Series Engines. posted Mon Feb 3 2014 22:02:21 by flyboy80
777-200 MLG Vs A350-900 MLG posted Sun Jan 26 2014 06:39:54 by william
Convair 880 Vs. Convair 880M posted Wed Jan 22 2014 11:00:22 by penguins
Skydrol VS. HyJet? posted Wed Dec 4 2013 11:53:43 by Grisee08
Labor Unions: Boeing Vs Airbus posted Sun Nov 17 2013 14:19:44 by aerotech777

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format