Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Gate Return  
User currently offlineWilcharl From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 3
Posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1005 times:

Today I was flying home, and after engine start, we had no air conditioning. we continued to taxi and shortly after the aircraft did a sharp turn into the GA ramp and started taxiing back to the gate. the fo came on and said we were returning for an inop. apu and that it was only a paperwork issue. mx came on board filled out the logs and we pushed back out, both engines were left running while we were in the gate. all in all this took 45 minutes

here is my question, if the APU was inop (apparently it was working as we had ground power and air on the ground along with starting the engines without an air start) so if the APU went offline during taxi out, why did we have to return to the gate to get this item mel'ed couldnt this have waited to our destination rather then doing a gate return ?



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineApathoid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 992 times:

It is a violation to depart with a known defect. Having maintenance defer the item would avoid any problems were they to pick up a fed anywhere along the line.

User currently offlineWilcharl From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 975 times:

but in reality how often is this the case? short of having an FAA guy riding jumpseat, or having an accident where the tapes are pulled who is to say that APU didnt light off when it was time for landing... yes im glad the crew leaned torwards the side of safety and had no problem with the gate return, but how often would this be the case? i know back in my airline days it an ontime dispatch seemed to outweigh safety

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 976 times:

I'll take your two questions in reverse order...

>>>couldnt this have waited to our destination rather then doing a gate return ?

No. It's long been an industry interpretation that for MEL item deferral purposes, an aircraft was considered to have "departed" once it pushed back from the gate area, or otherwise began its forward taxi out of the gate area, and towards the active runway. After a major case involving an improper deferral back in 1989 that resulted in the captain and dispatcher losing their licenses for 180 days, and the airline being fined $60,000, attention was focused on the issue. It took a few years, but FAA legal essentially ruled that an aircraft taxiing between the gate and the active runway has *NOT* departed, and is subject to the same MEL conditions that it would be had the inop item been discovered before having pushed back from the gate.

>>>why did we have to return to the gate to get this item mel'ed

Not every item that fails during taxiout is a critical issue, and some, in fact, I'd say most are handled over the radio between the flight's captain and their dispatcher (even in a centralized office, we have comm ability anywhere with the aircraft). In the case of an inoperative APU, one of the MEL provisos, or conditions for dispatch, is that the APU area of the tail must receive a visual inspection to confirm that there was no damage from any potential APU fire. The crew can't do this while out on a taxiway, so a gate return is required. That particular proviso was changed a few years ago--prior to it, it was just defer the APU via radio and go... Not any more.

The crew on your flight did it by the book--what airline gets the kudos for professionalism?


User currently offlineWilcharl From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 967 times:

the honors go to Delta

and the in flight crew was great and none of the pax were overly stressed over it, all in all it was a great flight


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Gate Return
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gate Assignments At SFO Int'l Terminal posted Fri Sep 8 2006 02:31:04 by Flyswim
Gate Assignments At Katl? posted Wed Mar 1 2006 03:11:13 by CDreier
De-icing At Gate posted Sat Dec 10 2005 22:17:46 by Pilatusguy
Blades Turning While Aircraft At The Gate... posted Sun Dec 4 2005 07:19:55 by Silver1SWA
After A D-Check, Does The Aircraft Return 'Like New'? posted Fri Nov 18 2005 23:28:21 by NWA1978
Reverse Thrust From Gate: Why Roll Forward? posted Sat Jul 30 2005 02:34:38 by Crownvic
Turnover Of A 737 After Return To Creditors posted Thu Jan 13 2005 03:48:20 by KingGeo3
Light Operations At Gate And After Landing posted Thu Jul 8 2004 06:43:09 by KBUF737
The Mechanics Of A Gate Start posted Wed May 26 2004 18:00:16 by UALPHLCS
T/o Problems Return To Same Airport? posted Wed May 5 2004 19:01:41 by XXXX10

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format