Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Average Engine Working Percentaje During Takeoff?  
User currently offlineJgore From Argentina, joined Feb 2002, 550 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 11 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2978 times:

Hi everyone
Does anyone know what is the average percentage the engines are working during takeoff ? could it be 90-93 percent ?.
Thanks in advance

jgore  Smile

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRmm From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 527 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2967 times:

Are you talking about overall performance or N1 speed at T/O?


User currently offlineIsmangun From Indonesia, joined Jan 2001, 117 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2933 times:

Well, with average T/O weight of 48 metric tons (around 106.000 lbs), our planes (737-200s with JT8D-17) requires around 95% N1. But T/O with full reduction (1.94EPR or 93%N1 with OAT 31 deg centigrade) is not unusual if the A/C is not so heavy and the runway conditions not restricting.

If it's an Airbus, I'll take the bus...
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

Hola Javier,
As always, there are several correct answers to your question.

Generally speaking, when it comes to turbofan and turbojet engines, you want to use 100% of an engine's "rated" thrust for takeoff. It must be remembered that (in very simplistic terms) turbine engines are not supercharged, but rather normally aspirated - in other words, they lose power with altitude just like a Cessna 152. The percentage of N1 (on most turbofans) or EPR (many turbojets) required to obtain the engine's full rated thrust will vary significantly depending upon airport elevation and outside air temperature. For example, on the aircraft that I fly, on a cool day at a sea level airport the engines will develop their maximum rated thrust with an N1 somewhere in the upper 80's say for example 88.7%. Go to a higher elevation airport on a warm day and the N1 will be higher, for example 93.4%. (As I type this, I'm looking at the Static Takeoff Thrust Setting Chart for our aircraft. Depending on the airport elevation and outside air temperature, the N1 settings vary from a low of 84.2% to a high of 96.1%.) These numbers will, of course, vary from engine to engine, but you get my point. On most older generation engines, the flightcrew is required to come up with a takeoff power setting from a set of charts or tables. In later generation engines with DEECs (Digital Electronic Engine Controllers) or FADECs, the pilots only have to set the powerlevers into the takeoff detent and monitor things while the computer takes care of the rest.

Just to make things a bit more interesting, some aircraft have larger engines installed than they were designed for. These engines are "Flat-Rated" back down to what the airframe was designed to handle. In other words, say for example, an airplane was designed to use 10,000 LB thrust engines, the aircraft designers might specify 12,000 LB thrust engines and limit their thrust to 10,000 LBS. Why would they want to do this? Simple, remember that turbine engines are "normally aspirated" and start loosing power the moment they start to climb. By using a larger engine, the aircraft can operate at higher altitudes or temperatures before it runs out of power. (Gee, I hope I said that right - it seems awkward. Oh well, there are others who are better qualified than me to clarify this.)

On many turbojet aircraft, flight crews are also allowed to perform Reduced Power Takeoffs. This method would also result in reduced N1 or EPR indications. There are several reasons why a flight crew might want to do this and a couple of methods that they can use to do it. I don't have the time to go into this in any detail now; but if you're interested I recommend that you search the archives, I'm sure this topic has been discussed before.

Turboprop engines are similar, only instead of N1 or EPR, they usually measure their power output in Percent Torque. For those guys it's a bit simpler, they simply advance the power levers until the engines reach either their torque limit or their temperature limit.


User currently offlineIsmangun From Indonesia, joined Jan 2001, 117 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2834 times:

Just to add little piece of info to Jetguy's explanation, T/O thrust is reduced when applicable to prolong service-life, noise reduction, and probably some other reasons I don't quite understand.  Smile

If it's an Airbus, I'll take the bus...
User currently offlineMetwrench From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 750 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2796 times:

What do the Performance charts say?

Engine performance is based on "sea level, average day '70 F temp".

Performance charts are based on these ref's. The charts will compensate for say, 6,000 Ft altitude and 100 F. It might say that 93% is the target torque. In that case, 93% is in reality 100%.

Just remember that all performance figures are based on a "Standard Day". 100% doesn't necessarily mean 100%.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Average Engine Working Percentaje During Takeoff?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A320 Losses Engine Cowlings During Takeoff? posted Thu May 13 2004 00:54:06 by Mr Spaceman
DC 10 Engine Noise During Takeoff posted Wed May 12 2004 23:32:11 by Gopal
Question About Engine Start Config. During Landing posted Wed Apr 26 2006 03:30:09 by Bio15
Unusual Noise During Takeoff In A330 posted Tue Nov 8 2005 07:00:49 by Ryfly777
Engine Shut-Down During Taxi posted Mon Oct 17 2005 04:40:14 by OzLAME
Where Are The Pilot's Eyes During Takeoff? posted Mon May 2 2005 21:14:22 by Sleekjet
Explosion During Takeoff? posted Wed Mar 23 2005 06:50:11 by Mjc
What Is The Point Of Seats Fwd During Takeoff? posted Wed Jan 14 2004 07:26:31 by KBUF737
Using Electronics During Takeoff posted Sun Jan 11 2004 05:19:20 by Bombayhog
Excessive Fuel Burned During Takeoff Lineup posted Wed Aug 13 2003 21:34:02 by Bio15

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format