Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 Fuel Consumption  
User currently offlineVivek1979 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 50 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 3 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Hello friends,
I recently heard something which I don't think made any sense but was unsure. Does a 747 consume more fuel taxing or in flight. I was watching a documentary on Discovery I think on cargo jumbos and I came across that. Im not sure if they were just trying to emphasize the actual ratio of consumption between the two and exagerrated a bit or what. Does anyone know how much does it cost to fill all 747 tanks?

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6451 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

40,000 dollars.

Turbojet and jurbofan engines are indeed very thirsty creatures in the thick air at sea level. They are designes to operate economically at cruising altitude.

But to say that taxiing consumes more fuel than cruising... Per mile, for sure! Per hour or minute, aeh... It depends on a lot of circumstances.

Taxiing is sometimes a fast run with engines at idle. But very often at congested airports before take-off it's a stop-go-stop-go. The latter is very expensive on fuel, especially on a heavily loaded plane.

On the other hand, after landing many airports have fast roll-off taxiways. Planes often turn off half of the engines when brakes are released and roll all way to the gate with the remaining engine(s) at idle.

Engine type? Some engine types idle better than others. I have been told that some old JT9 engines on early 747's have a very powerful idle. I have flown on such a plane only once, a 747-100. And sure enough, during taxiing for take-off the wheel-brakes were engaged much of the time to keep the speed down. But then we were very lightweight, around 100 pax of our way for a 50 minutes flight.

Also in cruise... It's a lot more expensive on fuel to cruise with almost full fuel tanks than at the end of a long flight when the plane is light.

I think that the Discovery over-simplified the situation. Very few things are that simple in aviation.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

We allow one ton taxi fuel for ground operations (fixed), 300kg an hour for APU burn, about 35 ton an hour through the take off roll, and approximately 10 ton an hour during cruise. These are grossly generalised figures, as it depends on altitude, temperature, weight etc. I'm sure if you taxied to your destination you would burn more fuel than if you flew, maybe that's what they're getting at?

User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

10 ton an hour in-flight on a B747? Isn't it little? I was told it burns about 12 tons even at Opt alt!


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineKAL_LM From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 497 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

For approximation purposes, we figure about 23,700Lbs/hour...average fuel consumption.

regards,
Tom



is that a light at the end of the tunnel or just a train?
User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 34
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Jet engines, though fuel burn in pounds per hour is high compared to other type aero engines, relatively speaking. In fact it's much more efficient than face value because of the massive distance covered during that hour due to its high speed.

These high cruising speeds (true air speed [TAS], not indicated airspeed[IAS]) are possible because of high altitude flight.

Raw number wise, fuel consumption during taxi/idle are the about as low as you can go.

The best bang for the buck though is during descent when engines are at idle and speeds are high and the jet is a glider. This is one of the primary duties of the FMS. To determine the most efficient point to begin descent.



You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineVivek1979 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 50 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Thankyou all for your insights.

User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Fuel burn (planning) 747-200s or 747-300s...
We account for some 1,000 kg (2,200 lbs) for the taxi-out for takeoff...
Assuming a heavy aircraft at 377,000 kg (833,000 lbs) takeoff weight, it will burn some 15,000 kg (33,000 lbs) to initial cruise level FL290 or 310...
First hours of cruise, expect some 13,000 kg (28,000 lbs) FF per hour...
As the plane gets lighter, at the end of cruise, maybe at FL370 or 390, the FF will decrease to under 10,000 kg (21,000 kg) per hour...
Descent, approach, landing, generally burn 3,000 kg (6,000 lbs) total...
Taxi-in will be anywhere from 500 to 1000 kg (1,000 to 2,000 lbs)...
Our company policy is plan landing at destination with 14,000 kg (30,000 lbs) which leaves us enough to proceed to an alternate destination + reserves...
The cost of a fill-up on a 747-200 or 300 varies with fuel prices, but be the capacity of these airplanes is generally 155,000 kg (345,000 lbs) with the 7 tanks configuration, or 165,000 kg (367,000 lbs) with 9 tanks...
Hope it helps...


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

B747Skipper thanks that's what I'm looking for too  Smile. But would be very interested to get figures for the B744 too. Anyone?


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Dear Mr.BA...
I dont have data for the 747-400s, I discussed the savings of lower fuel consumption with many, and correct, they burn a little less, and have more range... To do so, bear in mind that the 400s have -
(1) newer versions or higher engine "dash numbers" slightly more efficient...
(2) refined aerodynamics (reduced drag) - see the winglets...
(3) their tanks also have more fuel capacity (extra tank in tail)...
The 747-400 max takeoff weight is much more than the 200/300s which are certified up to 377,000 kg (833,000 lbs), some I hear are some 20,000 kg (or 45,000 lbs) heavier for max takeoff weight...
Been often in flight deck visits in cruise, of 400s, their fuel flows dont appear less than the 200/300s I fly... maybe they save, wild guess 500 kg (1,200 lbs) FF at equal weights... their fuel burn for taxi must be same as a 200/300...
Keep in mind, that a 400 can be an expensive airplane to buy (or lease) for that minimal fuel savings... US$100 million vs US$12 million for an older 747...
The seating capacity for a 400 is the same as a 300...
Crew cost savings for the 400, neither are justified really by "suppressing" the flight engineers. On a 200/300 the crew of three can legally fly up to 12 hrs without need for additional relief crew members, in a 400 with a crew of two, legs are not legal to fly 12 hrs legs, so they must at least provide a third crewmember for legs of 12 hrs, and that "third" crewmember must be... a fully qualified captain by regulations... which is a crewmember with a higher salary than the flight engineers they conveniently sent to unemployment...
Few airlines can really justify replacing 200/300s by... 400s...
I am a pilot, not an airline chief financial officer...
All the best... (s) Skipper


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Thanks B747Skipper! Appreciate those explanations!


Boeing747 万岁!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 747 Fuel Consumption
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Total Fuel Consumption For Two Segments? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 23:32:08 by WestWing
B767-200 Fuel Consumption Question posted Sun Nov 12 2006 07:06:31 by Jetline
Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (B737 & CFM56-7) posted Wed Jul 5 2006 11:58:51 by Kaddyuk
Fuel Consumption As Aircraft Ages posted Thu May 11 2006 02:01:13 by AirplaneCrazy
Passenger Airplane Fuel Consumption posted Thu May 4 2006 04:42:38 by PropilotJW
DC-9 And MD-8 Fuel Consumption posted Thu Feb 23 2006 06:04:22 by Rottamo
Fuel Consumption To Cruising Altittute posted Sun Feb 19 2006 19:16:27 by Ultrapig
Effect Of Temperature On Fuel Consumption & Height posted Sat Dec 24 2005 16:48:29 by Julesmusician
DC-8 Fuel Consumption posted Mon Sep 5 2005 10:51:27 by ChiefT
B733 Fuel Consumption posted Sun Aug 7 2005 20:15:20 by LMML 14/32
TLV-HKG Engine Fuel Consumption Calculation posted Sun Nov 20 2011 02:08:29 by An225
Engine Fuel Consumption posted Sat Nov 19 2011 06:48:13 by An225
Super Jumbo Fuel Consumption posted Mon Jul 4 2011 11:53:33 by BOEING747400
Fuel Consumption Measurements posted Fri Apr 22 2011 03:28:40 by pylon101
Lufthansa: A388 Vs B744 Fuel Consumption posted Sun Jun 27 2010 07:53:49 by 328JET
Boeing 777 Fuel Consumption posted Tue Jun 15 2010 02:41:26 by dkramer7
Fuel Consumption/Flight Managment System posted Thu Feb 25 2010 09:29:29 by Luftfahrer
747-8 Fuel Burn posted Tue Feb 9 2010 17:46:57 by cosmofly
Fuel Consumption Question... posted Tue Mar 3 2009 17:35:57 by Placekicker
Engine Fuel Consumption posted Sat Nov 19 2011 06:48:13 by An225
Super Jumbo Fuel Consumption posted Mon Jul 4 2011 11:53:33 by BOEING747400
Fuel Consumption Measurements posted Fri Apr 22 2011 03:28:40 by pylon101
Lufthansa: A388 Vs B744 Fuel Consumption posted Sun Jun 27 2010 07:53:49 by 328JET
Boeing 777 Fuel Consumption posted Tue Jun 15 2010 02:41:26 by dkramer7
Fuel Consumption/Flight Managment System posted Thu Feb 25 2010 09:29:29 by Luftfahrer
747-8 Fuel Burn posted Tue Feb 9 2010 17:46:57 by cosmofly
Fuel Consumption Question... posted Tue Mar 3 2009 17:35:57 by Placekicker
How To Work Out Fuel Consumption? posted Tue Feb 26 2013 10:09:22 by GAZ787PILOT
Fuel Burn As A Function Of Fuel Consumption 777-LR posted Thu Jan 10 2013 16:32:32 by iwok
Lufthansa 747-8 Fuel Burn posted Tue Jun 19 2012 15:19:45 by trex8
CO Going E+..Lower Fuel Consumption? posted Tue Jan 10 2012 01:31:44 by Schweigend
TLV-HKG Engine Fuel Consumption Calculation posted Sun Nov 20 2011 02:08:29 by An225
Engine Fuel Consumption posted Sat Nov 19 2011 06:48:13 by An225
Super Jumbo Fuel Consumption posted Mon Jul 4 2011 11:53:33 by BOEING747400
Fuel Consumption Measurements posted Fri Apr 22 2011 03:28:40 by pylon101

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format