Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
High-Bypass, Clamshell Reversers  
User currently offlineNgr From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 176 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4162 times:

I have a question about high-bypass jet engines.

Has there ever been a cowling for an engine that extends over EVERYTHING such that a "clamshell" reverser could be installed (not like the A-320s). The cowling would cover the tailpipes, etc. Also, is it possible to get a high-bypass engine to do "full reverse" such that no forward thrust is created, and all thrust is directed forwards, such as with the engines on MD-80s, etc.?


7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineEjaymd11 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 193 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4126 times:

The BR715 on the 717 is a high-by-pass engine with clamshell reversers.

Ejay MD-11

User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4017 times:

Dear Ngr -
With the old 747, they first came with fan reversers as well as turbine reversers... the turbine reversers were worthless, created problems and were deactivated in most instances... Later, even only fan reversers "only" were installed, forget the turbine reversers...
The "nice feature" of reversers, is to "cancel the residual thrust" of the engine at idle... I personally often land, just deploying the reversers and not using any power "in reverse" actually, combination of slight aerodynamic braking (nose high) and "idle reverse"... the only time I touch the brakes is at reduced speed (30-40 kts) to steer off the runway...
Reversers are NO part of the landing distance equation for transport airplanes in any case, they are just "extra help" to stop the plane. If you look on a landing distance problem, airplane "x" requiring a "5,000 feet runway" means that this airplane will fly over the runway threshold at 50 feet AGL, touch down, and using brakes and spoilers/speed brakes only - NO REVERSERS - stop in a 3,000 feet distance from the threshold...
Transport airplanes must be able to stop on 60% of the landing distance available... brakes and spoilers only - NO REVERSERS again...
... And yet I still have to tell little old ladies that planes are extremely safe, yet they dont believe me. I feel I am preaching in the desert... c'mon Abigail, sit on the jump seat, remove these cherries from your hat, and the net from your face, and watch what we do, these planes are super...  Wink/being sarcastic
(s) Skipper

User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3984 times:

An interesting fact is that when you turn on the autobraking on the B744 (and probably most other planes/models) it will actually use enough brakes to give you a deceleration proportional to your autobrake setting. IOW, the only thing which the reversers do is help reduce brake wear - they won't help you slow down faster.

Whether you use more than idle reverse thrust or not is up to airline SOPs and what they think will be the safest/most economical.


I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineRydawg82 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 877 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3942 times:

Didn't the original L1011's have clamshell reversers on the tail monuted s-duct engine??? Those would have been RR RB211s...I have seen pictures of this a/c with clamshell reversers...Can someone add the more technical information...Thanks Ry

You can take the pup out of Alaska, but you can't take the Alaska out of the pup.
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3727 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3929 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

the only thing which the reversers do is help reduce brake wear - not with carbon brakes. The T Revs delay the time it takes for the brakes to reach their optimum temp and this in turn increases brake wear.

It has now been proven that it is cheaper all round not to use the revs if it is possible. It saves brake & engine wear.

User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3906 times:

Thx VC-10, an additional piece in the puzzle. Not familiar with carbon brakes on airliners, I'm afraid.  Smile Corresponds nicely with the pointy-nose procedures, e g you either AD-brake or stomp on the brakes - not a little of both!


I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1325 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

All the early wide bodies (747, DC-10, L-1011) came out with a thrust reverser system that worked on both the hot stream and the cold stream. With terrible reliability and regularly leaving bits and pieces on the runway, by the time the A-300 came out, the hot stream portion of the thrust reverser system was gone.
Even though the thrust reverser system is not required for certification and is not used in braking tests, some airlines place their own restrictions on where a wide body could go with a thrust reverser inop. For instance, Eastern would not permit a wide body (especially a L-1011) into LGA without fully operative thrust reversers.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic High-Bypass, Clamshell Reversers
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
High Bypass Engines In Low Atmos Pressure? posted Thu Jan 27 2005 20:14:18 by Kaitak
Most Reliable High-bypass Engine. posted Thu Sep 23 2004 14:43:38 by Dakotasport
High Bypass Turbofan posted Sun Jun 6 2004 10:17:39 by Modesto2
High-bypass Fans At Altitude posted Wed Aug 29 2001 02:43:21 by Timz
High Bypass Core Intake posted Fri Sep 22 2000 17:37:52 by Beechbarron
A-340-200/300-Type Reversers posted Fri Nov 10 2006 21:47:29 by Blackbird
High Density And/or Valuble Cargo posted Fri Nov 3 2006 01:13:43 by 3DPlanes
Cascade Vs Blossoming Reversers posted Tue Aug 15 2006 06:48:28 by DreamsUnited
High Winged Aircraft posted Sun Aug 6 2006 18:18:28 by Captaink
High Air Temp Affecting Aircraft Performance? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 11:36:00 by Singel09

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format