I remember a photo of a HUD in an Air Inter airbus, some years ago, and I would like to know why this system is not more used (compared with military aircraft):
1/ it's too expensive
2/ It's not really usefull for civil flights.
Are military cargo fitted with HUD, or is the HUD reserved for fighters?
Exnonrev From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 621 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1436 times:
Little by little more airlines are evaluating or installing HUDs. Southwest has them in all of their 737-700s and gradually retrofitting the rest of the fleet. They are expensive, but they are extremely useful in low visibility situations.
Two military transports that I know of with HUDs are the C-17 and recent production C-130s.
OPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1425 times:
Like any new technology, costs come down as time goes by. We've seen it with pocket calculators, PCs, cellfones, you name it. HUDs are still costly, but IMHO, still well worth the investment.
All of SWA's -300, -500, and -700 fleet are equipped (almost 300 aircraft) and the only ones that are not are the 30 or so -200s which are in the twilight of their life here.
Nice thing about HUD (or HGS, the Flight Dynamics version) is that you don't just see benefits as far as CAT II/CAT III approaches are concerned. Not every airport has a CAT II/III approach, but a carrier can usually get reduced CAT I minimums if a HUD is used. At some places, that 2400 RVR gets lowered to 1800 or 1600, which is often enough to make the difference between getting in and diverting.
What I'm waiting for is the cost of APALs to come down (essentially, cruise missile navigation and mapping meets IR imagary, with results projected onto the HUD). That'll supposedly provide CAT III minima to any runway end irrespective of ground equipment installed.
MD11Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1404 times:
HUD on commercial aircraft is not really needed, IMHO. It's a nice to have thing and in some cases, it may be of some additional advantages but it's still a nice to have thing. Not really needed.
Southwest has it on their newer 737. American Airlines also is installing HUD on their 737-800. There are two manufacturers, Flight Dynamics and GEC Marconi (now British Aerospace or something like that). The Honeywell HUDs on the Gulfstreams are nothing but the GEC Marconi in disguise.
The companies are in the process of using synthetic vision like Forward Looking infrared (FLIR) to paint images on the HUD and that should be exciting and more useful (beyond the CatIIIa capability the HUD is getting now).
Pilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1378 times:
I believe that UPS installed them on their 727s that they use for charter operations. I know because I took one to Nassau, last year. When I visited the cockpit, the First Officer was quick to point out the new 'toy,' the HUD.