Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A346: Engine Vertical Alignment?  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (12 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2060 times:

Look at this pix:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/257294/M/

To me it looks as if 1) the fuselage is tipped forward, 2) the inboard engines are tipped downward and 3) the outboard engines are tipped upward. Is this right?

Even when the plane flies straight the engines are not thrusting straight. does the moment of all engines cancel-out or is there apparent wing twist-stress to deal with?



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCLL777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Its a forced perspective thing. If the picture were at a straigth angle things would look different, also using my vast knowledge (not) the wings looked tilted upwards, there by helping the illusion.

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

Looks to me like an optical illusion, caused by the sloping terrain in the foreground, and the top of the #2 engine cowl against the background of the deployed leading edge device.

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

I don't think the tilted wings upward would do anything, although it is a good point I did not take into consideration.

Optical illision, yes; and my butt. Slats or no-slats, the engines look off aligned; ( I am concentrating on a line from the center of intake to turbine cone) where the inboard engines appear to blow into the flaps and the outboard's blow into the ground.

Can someone find another pix of this exact plane in another view to help this guy?



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1969 times:

They might well be rigged to reduce wing bending moment, allowing lighter materials to be used. By toeing the outboard engines down they will produce a downwards force on the wing, balancing the upwards lift bending moment. Most jets with wing mounted engines toe the engines in to reduce the outward pulling effect, so I can understand why they'd apply the same to the upward movement.

User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41x From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4200 posts, RR: 37
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1931 times:

Also.. remember the airplane is sitting on the ground so all the load is off the wings.. so the wings arent flexed up like they would be in normal flight.


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2391 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1928 times:

They look pretty even in this photo: http://www.airbus.com/multimediaelements/188.jpg

User currently offlinePW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2485 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1847 times:

Lehpron
To me it looks as if 1) the fuselage is tipped forward, 2) the inboard engines are tipped downward and 3) the outboard engines are tipped upward. Is this right?

Your observations look pretty correct to me.
Before going into detail, please be reminded that this is a [ultra] long range aircraft. Aircraft configuration is fully optimized for long range cruise flight.
Furthermore be reminded that "tipped forward", "tipped downward", "tipped upward" are all relative terms. When the aircraft is in cruise, most likely the fuselage will have a couple of degrees incidence [typically 2-5 for commercial airliners] where the fuselage will generate a small amount of lift as well.

Usually the landing gear of an aircraft will be set up in such a way to position the fuselage a little nose down when the aircraft is on the ground. This reduces the angle of attack of the wing during take-off roll, thus reducing drag as speed increases upto the point of rotation, thereby reducing the length of the take-off roll. Drag is a byproduct of lift. So during the take-off roll you really want to reduce lift and thus drag.

Generally the engine nacelles [at least the inlet portion of them] will be angled to allow the airflow to enter the inlet in a straight line along the axis of the fan, to optimize inlet airflow. Now it's important to bear in mind that the inboard section of the wing generates more lift than the outboard part of the wing. As a result of the generation of lift, the air approching the wing will experiance an up-wash. That upwash is greater at the inner engine pair than at the outer engine pair. To cope with this upwash [in cruise flight] and have the air enter the inlet in a nice straight and level manner, the inner engine pair is "tilted downward". The upwash in front of the outer engine pair is much smaller, therefore they are angled differently in relation to the inner pair ["tipped upward"].
This also applies to lateral offset of the inner engines. If you would look at a top view, you'll notice that engines [especially those close to the fuselage, like 767/777] are a little towed in, to cope with the air that is beign forced sideways outboard by the fuselage. On rear fuselage engines you'll see that the engines ar towed out, since the fuselage shape curves the airstream back to the fuselage centreline due to the narrowing of the fuselage at the rear of the aircraft.

This "tipping" has nothing to do with wing bending moment. Only the weight of the engine [and fuel load off course among others] will significantly affect wing bending moment. Imagine that you tilt the engine downward in order to reduce wing bending moment. Now when the engine is thrusting downward, it will eat up part of the lift that is being generated by the wing. Therefore the wing now needs to generate even more lift to balance out the 'negative lift' being produced by the downward thrusting engines!! This doesn't make sense at all in terms off alleviating wing bending moment.

Wing tilting when loaded is an interesting concept. Although I doubt that a wing will tilt sufficiently to align the inner and outer engine pair.

PW100



Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A346: Engine Vertical Alignment?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A346 And 777 Engine Comparison posted Wed Jun 11 2003 22:37:39 by Bigphilnyc
Single Engine Airliners Of The Future? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 15:59:29 by DHHornet
Engine In Tri-jets. posted Tue Nov 28 2006 00:52:14 by AerLingus747
737 Shutting Down Engine Before Stopping posted Mon Nov 27 2006 20:48:18 by Coolpilot
Engine Removal: Ballast Needed? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 03:41:00 by Bobster2
Starting A Multi Engine Seaplane posted Fri Nov 17 2006 00:17:07 by ElpinDAB
MAS 777 Trent Engine Failure On Takeoff posted Mon Nov 6 2006 17:30:22 by Corsair2
All Avialable 777 Engine Options posted Sun Oct 29 2006 22:09:11 by FighterPilot
757 RR Engine On Wing Time posted Sat Oct 21 2006 23:14:31 by MarkC
757 Engine Thrust Comparison. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 05:09:36 by BOE773

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format