Mr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2786 posts, RR: 9 Posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2878 times:
I'm wondering why the 737 in the photo below is flying such a tight and low pattern while approaching to land on runway 29 at Oakland's International Airport? Also, is this a Standard Arrival (STAR) for rwy 29 at OAK.
The only reason I can think of is that the 737 is staying clear of San Francisco Intl's airspace. Is this the reason?
To me, the view from this 737 (that appears to be starting it's left turn for base leg) looks like it should be from a much smaller aircraft. It must be quite a ride into OAK on an airliner for rwy 29.
Where I live in Toronto, the airliners in the pattern for runways 23 and 24R normally turn onto their left base directly over my home, which is 15 nautical miles away from Toronto's Intl Airport.......much different than the rwy 29 approach at Oakland.
I'm used to a view like this from an airliner when flying in the pattern.
Mr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2786 posts, RR: 9 Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2778 times:
Obviously the 737 is flying a "normal approach" for that particular airport (OAK).
I'm simply asking why it's turning onto left base while so close (compared to other airport's patterns like Toronto's where left base is 12 to 15+ NM out, or even the pattern the Avroliner is flying in the second photo). Is it simply a matter of maintaining airspace clearance?
I'm not questioning the performance abilities of the 737 airliner itself.
Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6631 posts, RR: 7 Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2753 times:
...I assume no airliner could possibly be turning left base at that point, to fly the ILS to Runway 29. He must have meant they were making a slight left turn on the downwind.
However! The real mystery is were they flying a left-traffic approach to runway 29 at all. As far as I know that is utterly unheard of at OAK. The usual (invariable?) approach from the north to runway 29 is: cleared by Oakland Center to cross 10? nm N of Sausalito VOR at 7000 ft; a few miles N of Sausalito call Bay Approach, who immediately turns them left to 100 or 110 degree heading, and soon after clears them to 5000 ft; they continue on that heading over Berkeley or North Oakland and maybe 7-9 miles past the airport to turn right base.
But the slats are out, so I don't have a better explanation offhand.
AAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3434 posts, RR: 49 Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2569 times:
If one had looked to the airplane's right side during downwind leg one would have seen another airport not too far away.... SFO!!! Good probability that if you'd have looked up on the right side you'd have seen an aircraft on right downwind for 28R at SFO as well. The SFO aircraft can not descend or turn toward SFO until clearance from OAK downwind traffic is assured, hence the apparent "in close" approach. Just another daily normal OAK operation.
*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
BR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2558 times:
Looks perfectly normal to me.
I couldn't have said so better. I have made an approach like this into GPT on an AirTran 717. We made a steep left turn, and then just as we finished the turn, we landed. We came in 320 degrees to the Northwest, and made a steep turn, and landed 140 degrees to the Southeast. That 717... A Wonderful bird she is. Or Maybe because AirTran's Pilots treat her like a fighter jet. (But she handles like a fighter jet IN MY OPINION)
Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6631 posts, RR: 7 Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2549 times:
Well, if AAR90 sez it's normal I better be careful... but:
If you stand on the OAK runway 29 threshold, facing down the runway, the SFO runway 28R threshold is 8.61 nm away at your 9:30 position (i.e. relative bearing 78 degrees left). We all agree that some SFO arrivals from the north approach runway 28R downwind down the Bay, between the two airports; I think they're typically cleared from 11,000 ft down to 6000 about the time they pass between the airports. And we all agree that at least some OAK arrivals fly their downwinds to runway 29 NE of OAK, with a right base-- right? Question is, what would be the point of any OAK arrivals flying downwind down the Bay? They'd be beneath the SFO-28R downwind arrivals? But they'd sure have to be above above the SFO-1R departures. Last time I looked SFO 1R departures are supposed to be at or above 3000 at 6 DME; their pre-departure clearance is ordinarily climb to 15,000-- far as I know, no restriction beneath any arrival traffic.
Maybe I haven't looked hard enough, but I've never seen an OAK 29 arrival fly downwind down the Bay. But I'll look harder now.
AAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3434 posts, RR: 49 Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2489 times:
>Maybe I haven't looked hard enough, but I've never seen an OAK 29 arrival fly downwind down the Bay.
I've done it about a dozen times that I can recall. My guess --based upon my experience-- is that it is used during periods of relatively low activity at SFO. OTOH, I've often been issued Rwy-01L takeoff clearances based upon visual sighting of OAK downwind traffic --my departure being either a left turn toward Half-Moon Bay or visually over the bridges.
*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
Mr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2786 posts, RR: 9 Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2340 times:
Thanks for your replies. They were very interesting.
One airline pilot member stated the approach looked normal.
One member's thought was "who the hell cares", while another who lives in Oakland believes that an airliner flying a left downwind for rwy 29 is very unusual and that he's never witnessed this....so he's going to look harder.
AAR90 (a 737-800 Captain), says that the 737's approach to rwy 29 is just another daily normal OAK operation, which he's flown himself a dozen times. He also mentioned that the 737's downwind leg was close in probably because of other traffic on downwind to SFO on the right. This answer is what I suspected might be the reason for a lower, tighter approach than I've ever flown into an airport on an airliner including a 737.
Like I said, that approach must be a fun ride in a 737 airliner compared to the higher, wider approaches I'm used to enjoying.