Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search
 Whats The Highest You Picked Up An ILS Beam
 Trent_800 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2002, 136 posts, RR: 0Posted Fri Sep 20 2002 14:37:14 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3623 times:

 the question is in the subject really. Whats the higest altitude you have picked up either a localiser or GS beam?. i was just wondering what he range is on these devices.
 Jetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted Fri Sep 20 2002 17:01:40 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

 Daniel, This is a very good question. As you know, the ILS is comprised of two separate radio beams, the localizer and the glideslope. Both signals are highly directional directional and line of sight. Most glideslopes are set up for a 3 degree descent. Simple math will show that 3 degrees = 318' per nautical mile. If you're at 10,000 feet you will intersect the center of the glideslope signal approximately 31.4 miles. If you're at FL450 and the airport's at sea level the distance is 141.5 miles. Do glideslope signals have enough "oomph" to travel those distances? The answer is probably, but they aren't usable at those distances. I often fly from Klamath Falls, OR to Sacramento, CA. It's a short flight, something like 208 NM. The unique thing about those two airports is that after taking off from runway 14 at Klamath Falls it's an absolutely straight shot to either runway 16L or 16R at Sacramento. Out in that part of the country, the traffic is so light that you seldom get much if anything in the way of vectors. All things being equal, we would normally climb to FL330 on a trip of that distance. Sacramento is 27' MSL, so based on 318'/NM you would center the glideslope at about 104 NM out. I have done that several times. (We typically get "pilot's discretion" descents" going into there.) On that particular leg, the localizer signal has always been strong enough to be picked up at the "top of climb", which is usually about 160 miles out of Sacramento and we "fly into the glideslope around 100 miles out. This corresponds nicely with what the VNAV usually computes for us, so in essence, we fly what amounts to a 150 mile ILS profile. The next question is, are the signals usable at those distances? No. The signals are like spokes in a wheel and at those distances there is so much lateral and vertical "slop" in them, that the are practically useless for anything other than saying, "Hey look, we've got the localizer at 150 miles." We may be flying the profile with both the localizer and glideslope signals being, more or less centered, but that's just a fluke because we're navigating with the FMS. The localizer signals don't become "focused" enough to be really usable until you're 15 or 20 miles out from the airport. I hope this answers your question. Jetguy
 Trent_800 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2002, 136 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 14:03:58 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3449 times:

 Cheers Jetguy, i would also presume that weather has an effect on beam range?
 Jetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 16:23:07 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3431 times:

 Not really. The frequencies used for the localizer and glideslope signals are pretty much immune from weather interference - at least at the ranges that they are usable for lateral and vertical navigation. The main signals that are affected by weather are: 1. The ADF - It's primary job is accomplished using low frequency signals. However, most people just us it to listen to the AM radio band.  2. Weather Radar - If it wasn't affected by weather (rain) it wouldn't be of much use. 3. GPS - It's signal can be attenuated by heavy rain. 4. VHF Comm radios - Can be affected with precipitation static (p-static), but this there is usually an underlying problem with the aircraft bonding if this is an issue. Jetguy
 Airplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 17:10:51 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3424 times:

 Jetguy, Localizer signals are in the same band as VHF COMM and NAV and can be just as easily affected by p-static. The general rule of thumb is: 1)The higher the frequency, the less susceptible the signal is to atmospheric disturbances. 2) The higher the signal strength (transmitter power) the less susceptible it is to atmospheric disturbances. 3) Pretty much anything but amplitude modulated (AM) signals add an additional level of resistance to atmospheric disturbances. Therefore, although GPS signals are relatively high frequency in the order of 1.5 GHz, they are very low power and can be attenuated by precipitation. ADF signals, like you mentioned are relatively low frequencies and amplitude modulated (AM) and are very vulnerable to atmospheric disturbances and man-made electrical noise. VHF COM/NAV/LOC signals are all equally suceptible but the Glideslope signals which are in the order of 300 MHz are somewhat less vulnerable because of the higher frequency. By the way, it's no coincidence that weather radar tends to operate at the same frequency as your microwave oven (10 GHz) since the intent is to detect precipitation.
 Jetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 5, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 17:38:30 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

 Airplay, You're absolutely correct about p-static affecting the localizer frequencies, but I qualified my statement by saying "at least at the ranges that they are usable for lateral and vertical navigation." For all intents and purposes, once you're close enough to be using it for an approach, say within 15 miles or so of the transmitter antenna, it's going to have to be raining awfully hard to cause you a problem. (Probably so hard that you'd be on your way to the alternate.) Additionally, like I said, if you encounter a problem with p-static it's because there's probably a maintenance problem - poor bonding - going on at the same time.
 Artsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4748 posts, RR: 32 Reply 6, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 18:57:07 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3407 times:

 If the radio beams are as strong as you suggest, is there contamination of the beam when you fly into somewhere like San Francisco ?, you would have signals from San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose all crossing each other. Jeremy
 Covert From Ghana, joined Oct 2001, 1586 posts, RR: 2 Reply 7, posted Sat Sep 21 2002 19:58:43 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3393 times:

 That's where adequate spacing of frequencies come in...
 none
 Ups763 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 199 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted Sun Sep 22 2002 03:33:43 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3346 times:

 Hi all, Jetguy said it all. When you select the localizer frequency(108.10-111.95) you receive both LOC and GS, except when flying the BC. In the helicopter I usually pick up the GS at approx. 10 nm from the runway. As for the localizer, usually at about 18 nm out from the runway. Around 10-18 nm from the runway the localizer is good for about 10 degrees on each side of the centerline. When under 10 nm out it becomes more sensitive and is usable for about 35 degrees on each side of the centerline. Cheers, Matt
 AAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3587 posts, RR: 44 Reply 9, posted Mon Sep 23 2002 05:21:22 UTC (13 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

 >Whats the higest altitude you have picked up either a localiser or GS beam? FL420, localizer and GS for ILAX over Colorado River..... very early a.m.
 *NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
 Top Of Page Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Whats The Highest You Picked Up An ILS Beam
• Tech/Ops related posts only!
• Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
• No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
• No hostile language or criticizing of others.
• Do not post copyright protected material.
• Use relevant and describing topics.
• DETAILED RULES

 Similar topics: More similar topics...
Can You Power Up The APU posted Mon Nov 14 2005 19:24:22 by Jamesbuk
Alpha Speed - Whats The History On The Name posted Wed Aug 16 2006 14:11:08 by HAWK21M
Whats The Similarities Between The TF-39 And CF-6? posted Wed May 31 2006 22:52:49 by 747400sp
Whats The Story On This Forward Section Of 777 posted Mon May 15 2006 08:46:18 by Seachaz
The Effect Of Wind On An Aircrafts Indicated Speed posted Thu Mar 2 2006 21:19:43 by Jamesbuk
Pilots-What's The Fastest You've Flown Below 10K? posted Thu Oct 27 2005 07:15:03 by 2H4
Whats The Purpose Of This Light? (F100) posted Sat Sep 24 2005 00:12:24 by SkyWestFan
How Does An ILS Work? posted Fri Jul 1 2005 22:22:51 by Palladium
Whats The Test Being Conducted posted Tue Oct 12 2004 17:11:46 by HAWK21M
I Can Solve The Sonic Boom Issue, To An Extent posted Mon Apr 26 2004 20:11:43 by Lehpron