Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Spoiler Activation On Long Runways  
User currently offlineWardialer From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1183 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1735 times:

Is it really necessary to activate the spoilers on long runways? I watch airplanes land on 25L which is 11,096 feet at KLAX Airport and each time they land the spoilers come up and they even activate the reverse thrust especially on the B737, and A-320s. The runway should be long enough for them to stop without spoilers.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBragi From Iceland, joined May 2001, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

There might be many reasons for this. For example, at a busy airport like KLAX they are probably hurrying to vacate the runway so another aircraft can use it.
Most airlines also want to save wear and tear on the engines, and therefore they want to make more use of spoilers to slow down the aircraft in stead of using reverse thrust.

I hope that answers your question. Big grin



Muhammad Ali: "Superman don’t need no seat belt." Flight Attendant: "Superman don’t need no airplane, either."
User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

I think you have a misconception as to what the spoilers are actually for. Many people believe they exist to provide aerodynamic braking. In fact that is not their primary function (it is quite a negligable effect).

What the spoilers do is literally "spoil" the airflow over the wing, dumping the lift force. The wing goes from creating much lift to simply being two big bits of heavy metal.

The spoilers therefore allow all the aircraft weight to be supported by the wheels, increasing friction and allowing the wheels to grip better and therefore maximise available braking. Remember that when a transport aircraft touches down it is still at least 1.2 times the stall speed, still perfectly capable of flight, and the wings are still creating significant lift.

On most aircraft the speedbrakes deploy automatically on touchdown (provided the pilot selects the function in advance) and many aircraft will extend the spoilers automatically on application of reverse thrust.

The use of Reverse Thrust as a standard operating procedure has been discussed recently on the forum, in my airline we always engage it to maximum by procedure on every landing, except in a few defined cases. Many aircraft you see will only be engaging reverse "idle".



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1636 times:

Rick is absolutely correct, spoilers have very little to do as speed brakes by generating drag... Speed brakes is the name given (generally) by Boeing...
xxx
At times I criticize the terminology used in England about some aircraft components - "undercarriage" - for gear, is one example - but often, England uses much more accurate terminology... example, spoilers (or speed brakes) are often referred to as "lift dumpers", love that wording, as it really means what they do. Most of the drag comes from flaps rather than spoilers.
xxx
Rick, what I often do on long runways on the 747, is NOT TO ARM spoilers before landing, to get that "smooth landing" which impresses so much passengers as to this superior "master pilot"... arming speed brakes makes that touch down so hard on the 747 (deploy with gear geometry position) whereas the spoilers in manual deploy with the thrust reverser levers... and all landings are extremely smooth... try it, if your old man allows that  Wink/being sarcastic
xxx
I assume it is equivalent in your 767...?
Happy contrails
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 1595 times:

Skipper,

Yes the "speedbrake" logic is the same on the 757/767. If armed (which is our SOP on all landings) provided both tilt sensors detect ground contact and both thrust levers @ idle, they will deploy automatically. This ruins what could be a very gentle landing in many cases, like you said.

It is also the case that even with the speedbrakes in the DOWN detent, with either reverse thrust lever raised to the interlock the speedbrake lever will move to the up position and all will deploy.

Because we use full reverse or reverse idle on pretty much all landings that means your idea would also work, getting a nice smooth touchdown on the deck then applying reverse thrust. Worth a try I think... I also find the autobrakes can be a bit jerky upon touchdown so having those off as well could give a really smooth landing.

It would have to be a long runway though to do both those things, if you're not going to follow the SOPs then the last thing you need is to whizz off the end @ 60 knots! Our company does allow discretion with autobrake (non-)usage on long dry runways though.



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2568 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

Skipper,
You are right about the 767. I've been with captains that do that (not arm spoilers) and it does help smooth out the landing, although not as much as it did on the DC-10. I don't know if it is the short stroke of the landing gear pistons, or the gear geometry, or who-knows-what, but it seems harder to make a greaser on the 767 than the DC-10.

Possibly, it may be since the -10 had a higher wing loading, the landing spoilers killed a lot more lift, causing the plane to really thump in if the pilot wasn't careful. Landing without the spoilers really did make a difference, but like I said, I haven't seen it help smooth things out as much on the 767.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineErj-145mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 19 hours ago) and read 1579 times:

On the ERJ's, with the weight on wheels sensors (WOW) sense ground contact, and the brake pedals are depressed, the ground spoilers are activated by the brake control unit (BCU) when the ground speed is greater than 25 kts, this is generated by the 4 wheel speed transducers.

Dave
Continental Express
QC Inspector
TYS


User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 4 hours ago) and read 1505 times:

Dear Rick - Dear Hal -
xxx
I assumed your birds were the same as mine, looks exact equivalent...
xxx
Have to admit I only do that, on long runways - 10,000+ft, dry conditions, if anything less than ideal, I go by the book... but try it if your captains are civilized persons...
xxx
Never have problems stopping 2/3 down the runway doing this... I practiced this a lot in my days flying Air Force E-3s and E-4s, result is, for me doing "aerodynamic braking" is superb, and smooth as well... the whole cabin is "clapping their hands"... you may be the worst pilot in the airlines, but if you land smooth, passengers have the highest regards for your abilities...
xxx
 Wink/being sarcastic
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (12 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

"you may be the worst pilot in the airlines, but if you land smooth, passengers have the highest regards for your abilities..."

Skipper,

Isn't it funny how, despite your hard work for perhaps 9 or 10 hours in getting the aircraft safely from A to B, the passenger perception of a "good" flight or "good" pilot is all based on that last few seconds of flight... the touchdown.

As my base training captain told me, "a firm touchdown at the aiming point is a better landing than a greaser outside the touchdown zone". Very true, but the passengers would probably disagree!



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Spoiler Activation On Long Runways
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Use Reverse Thrust On Long Runways posted Tue Jan 11 2005 10:15:14 by JumboJim747
V1 On Long Runways posted Tue Nov 11 2003 23:53:20 by Sxmarbury33
Number Of Cans On A Long Haul Flt posted Tue Aug 15 2006 00:58:48 by XXXX10
BBN Beacon On Long Island posted Thu Oct 31 2002 17:23:11 by Mirrodie
Relief Crews On Long Haul Flights posted Mon Mar 18 2002 17:30:33 by Macmac76
Long Range Aircraft On Short Range Flights posted Thu Aug 10 2006 12:48:02 by LPLAspotter
Tyre Rubber On Runways posted Wed Jun 14 2006 19:27:12 by HKA
Runways On Inclines Go Downhill Even If Tailwind? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 17:40:58 by Julesmusician
Crewing On A Weekly Long-haul Flight posted Fri Jun 18 2004 06:21:42 by Macmac76
How Many Crews On Ultra Long Flights posted Sat Mar 27 2004 19:03:18 by MNeo

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format