Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aircraft Rotations 1 For 2  
User currently offlineCoronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1342 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2800 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Particularly under the current airline industry conditions why don't airlines such as AA or UA shift to using a single aircraft on 6 weekly rotations on routes such Mia-SAO -GRU instead of dedicating 2 aircraft to fill the route. Currently you see an AA 777 heading south at 11:20pm and returning North the next evening at 11:10pm, with about a 11+ hour layover at Sao Paulo.

Considering the depreciation and financing costs on not one but two 777's to fill this schedule, does not it under current circumstances make sense to offer a reduced fare on say a noon return from GRU to MIA? At some point the fares have to fill the aircraft so you can operate a single plane 18-20 hours per day with one day off for maintenance, and not tie up two planes with heavy amortization and debt expenses?. It's not like the competition or semi-competitors in the form of code share partners such as TAM are in that good of a shape, financially to counter.

Sure, sure the evening flights are preferred by businessmen, but surely at some point it has to make more sense to run fewer aircraft 18 or more hours per day rather than run a double fleet of pricey 777 with each a/c only averaging 8 flight hours per 24 hr period! Or do the handful of first and business class fares for the 11pm departure cover all the amortization and depreciation for the time in which the 777's are sitting on the ground?

Is there a Southwest financial wizard in the house? I don't want to ask an AA or UA financial wizard because based on their recent Income Statements, their qualifications are suspect at present.

The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2593 times:

Coronado -
Yes you make sense - but using an airplane some 12 hours average per day is not bad at all, many airlines do not achieve such daily use...
The other concern is that these AA + UA flights are competing against Varig which is probably offering equal number of flights. It is not only what one airline offers, but needs to see what the competition does. Is TAM also flying that route presently...?
Then to be considered too, how much of a load factor do they have on deck (passenger) and belly (cargo) - all that as you know enter in the equation.
Fleet planning people... with AA and UA, I do not know their ideas... I once flew as passenger GRU - MIA and they had outstanding cabin service, while I hear so many gripes about AA and UA... Then maybe look at the schedules.
Happy contrails -  Wink/being sarcastic
(s) Skipper

User currently offlineCoronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1342 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2531 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


Agreed. Varig is however hemorraging and would be particularly vulnerable to aggressive fare pressures at present.

Musing out loud--You can bet a Connexxion equipped fleet with reasonably high speed internet access would totally change the demand for overnight flights. More than 1/2 the execs would IMHO prefer day time flights if they can be on line or at least feel that they are able to be in contact, rather than loose sleep on the overnighters.

Since I got a Verizon aircard with 140K speed internet access (via the cellular network) on my laptop, I gave up on the red-eyes from the west coast to MSP. I can be emailing my customers right up to door closing and so only am out of circulation 3 hrs or so (instead of the previous 7 hrs including ground transport, check in and security), in flights to and from LAX/LAS/SFO and MSP). I just flew back yesterday from LAS to MSP following Comdex and I was emailing customers until 9:20 am and was back on line 3 1/2 hours later emailing while riding in a taxi , thanks to the aircard. I felt that I could afford to be out of the loop for the 3 or so hours.

I gladly pay hotels 10.00 per day for high speed internet compared to dial up service. If Continental were to give me continuous internet and phone access for even as much as $100.00 extra , I would gladly take a day time flight from EWR to Sao Paulo GRU and vice versa rather than trying to catch some sleep on an overnight flight and feeling like s%&t after landing next day at 10:45 am local after having left MSP at 450pm the previous day connecting to their EWR-GRU departutre at 10pm.

As the baby boomers get older and wider( Smile), the overnighters are for bats.

This could be an interesting thread: Will high speed internet when available on board international flights totally change the current airline scheduling model? Why not an 8:00 am departure from MSP-LGW arriving in the evening instead of the current 6:50 pm departure arriving 8:55 am. I dread that flight and I would rather pay more to spend the day time hours on board working using high speed internet for a few hours. The current option of spending the next day in a mixture of exhausted jet lag, caused by poor sleeping accomodations scrunched into a seat would be a thing of the past!! Jet lag alone is enough of a curse!

The key is that continous high speed internet access will allow the F and J pax as well as our self employed Y class working stiffs (such as yt) to feel that they can be in touch at all times, so why not travel when your body clock is happiest rather than burn the red-eye oil?

What do you think?

The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Aircraft Rotations 1 For 2
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aircraft(s) Flying For Iceland Express Now? posted Tue Apr 5 2005 18:50:27 by Asgeirs
Aircraft Maintenance For Smaller Airlines posted Sun Sep 21 2003 22:04:16 by AirjamPanam
Aircraft Rotations 1 For 2 posted Tue Nov 12 2002 05:28:03 by Coronado
Operating Costs For An Aircraft? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 21:08:23 by Transatlantic
Single Engine Procedures For Commuter Aircraft posted Sun Sep 17 2006 22:05:36 by AdamWright
ATA 100 Codes For Business/Corporate Aircraft posted Tue Aug 1 2006 19:02:53 by Aogdesk
Small Cargo Planes For Large Aircraft Flights posted Sun Apr 23 2006 10:33:50 by QFA380
Max. Cycles For Commercial Jet Aircraft posted Tue Mar 28 2006 14:32:41 by Redcordes
Other Forums For Aircraft Mechanics? posted Fri Feb 24 2006 19:05:11 by Aogdesk
Winter Tyres For Aircraft? posted Fri Feb 3 2006 15:02:05 by A342

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format