Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why B747-400D Doesn't Have Winglets  
User currently offlineSAA-SAL From Belgium, joined Nov 2000, 356 posts, RR: 3
Posted (15 years 6 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4447 times:

I was wondering why a B747-400D (high capacity, shorter range) doens't have winglets. Winglets reduce drag so they should also do this on short haul flights?

SAA B747 SP, Luxavia B747 SP
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4387 times:

Winglets only really make a difference on supper long haul flights. Winglets reduce drag but they also create weight which only balance out on long haul flights!

User currently offlineJSchultz From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4363 times:

There is also an issue with fatigue life of the wing that must be looked at. As far as the 747-400D goes.. those operators (JAL, ANA & KAL) must fly the 400D as a domestic for half of the a/c's fatigue life and them install the winglet/wing extension kit to fly the same aircraft as a long-hauler to use the entire fatigue life of the aircraft. Now the question is will the operators do that or sacrifice the shortened fatigue life?


User currently offlineTarantine From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4333 times:

The main reason the 747-400 has winglets was to increase the overall wing area due to its 870,000lb Max t/o wgt.
The 747-400D has much less t/o wgt., but when the -400D gets high cycle time, it can be converted to a long range -400 model, then winglets will probably be attached.
I don't think winglets make much overall difference. If they really did, I am sure that the 777 would have them. I always thought of winglets as an airbus trademark.

User currently offlineGalaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4307 times:

winglets really dont help out at all. they may add a few km in range after a 12-16hr flt but they cost extra weight and money to put on. but they do look cool. 

"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3508 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 4263 times:

They reduse drag which increases range which is not neaded.

User currently offlineJ57pw43 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 months 10 hours ago) and read 4257 times:

Hey, Airbus may think that they invented all the high tech stuff, but they did not! Where was airbus when the 707 was created? I agree, if winglets are so great, why are they not on the high tech 777?

User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 months ago) and read 4242 times:

Where on earth do you guys get your ideas from??

Have you seen the BBJ and the B747-200 with WINGLETS? They make a huge difference to the fuel flow. Try doing some research on wingtip vortices and induced drag.

As for why they are not on the 777, remember that the 777 was a new design, the concept of NOT INVENTED HERE was applied.......

I'm sure that APN of Seattle will prove the winglets make an improvement on the 777... just give them time.

PS, to answer the question of where was airbus when the 707 was invented.... well i guess that it was busy flying the COMET!

Boeing and Douglas actually learned lessons from the design of the COMET such as not to use square windows.

PPS, where is the USA SST? Remember that Concorde is based on 1960s technology.

User currently offlineN-156F From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4231 times:

No Boeing/Airbus wars here, please. Airbus didn't invent the Comet, de Havilland did.
As far as winglets on the B747-400D, they really aren't needed. They add extra weight to an already underpowered design (B744D has 45,700 lbs. per engine, as opposed to 57,900 for B744). The reduced drag incentive only plays out on long-haul flights, which the B744D with a sub-2,000 mile range, does not do.
Now, once the jets reach the halfway point of their (perceived) design life, they'll likely be given extra fuel tanks, winglets, and bigger engines and used intercontinentally, or bought up by cargo operators then re-engined.

And, yes, I always have thought of winglets as an Airbus trademark myself- what planes they make don't have them? Just the A300 and A310-200, AFAIK. That's got to say something about their effectiveness.

User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 7133 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 4227 times:

Winglets were invented by NASA.
All details were published in a fully public NASA report some 25-30 years ago.
Winglets can reduce drag by up to around 3% on an ordinary airliner.
But their shape and profile is very complicated. And unfortunately they have to be optimised for one "Coefficient of lift" (Cl) of the wing. In laymen's terms it means that they must be optimised for one speed, one altitude and one aircraft weight. Therefore the actual gain will always be considerably less than 3%. For some flight regimes the effect can easily be negative.
There are different types of winglets. The small ones on most Airbus planes are considerably less effecttive - will never gain 3%, but then they have a wider speed/altitude/weight "window" in which their effect is positive.
From this information it is easily understood that their extra weight and supporting wing structure is hard to justify on short range planes.
It is quite natural that the first 737 with winglets was the BBJ, the only 737 long range version. And that on other 737s they are offered as an option only. Clever decision by Boeing.
The less effective, and also less harmful Airbus winglet version on ALL planes is probably an equally wise decision, Just different. Winglets will always be a compromise. Well, most things on airliners are compromises.
Best regards, Preben Norholm

Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs
User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 25
Reply 10, posted (15 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4199 times:


There are two major means to decrease drag on wings: either put winglets or increase wingspan.

The A340 and 747-400 got a winglet, but that wasn't the ideal because those required a wing strengthening to hold the weight of the winglets (thus adding structural weight).

The 777 got a lengthened wingspan.

The newest aircraft get blended winglets, thanks to which a lesser structural reinforcement is required.

The 777LR will feature raked wingtips, already fitted on the 767-400ER.

And yes: the NASA invented the winglets on a US Army requirement. After making some tries they saw that winglets reduced drags (seen on DC-10's models).

Best regards,
Alain Mengus

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why B747-400D Doesn't Have Winglets
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Doesnt The 747sp Have Winglets? posted Wed Jan 18 2006 20:51:05 by Jamesbuk
Why AA's B738 Dont Have Winglets? posted Mon Jul 21 2003 19:36:49 by B752fanatic
B777s Do Not Have Winglets Why? posted Tue Jun 17 2003 04:07:35 by Wardialer
Why Do Airports Have Both 3 And 4 Letter Codes? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 00:28:23 by AirPacific747
Why Doesn't ATL Use Immediate Departures? posted Sun Sep 3 2006 06:41:24 by SESGDL
747-800: Why No Winglets? posted Sat Dec 17 2005 03:29:54 by Thrust
Why Pas Can't Have GPS On Com Airline posted Sun Nov 13 2005 02:54:48 by Airfoilsguy
Why Did Soviet Airliners Have Glass Nose? posted Sun Sep 11 2005 15:13:26 by TaromA380
Why Does Ksea Have Class D Airspace posted Thu Jun 16 2005 04:13:05 by Qxeguy
Why Not Winglets On Every Airplane? posted Thu Jun 2 2005 18:24:04 by KCMike

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format