L4141 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5166 times:
I'd like what you think about electronic flight bag.
I think that can be very nice for a lot of reasons, such as you don't lose the pages due to the high number of times that you scroll the pages and also you don't have to spend 30 minute to put the chart in the right order in the binder.
Gotairbus From Singapore, joined May 2001, 851 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5044 times:
Oh come on...
How would opening a small program (on Windows systems) give a fatal error or or some sort?
FYI: (consider this: ) The programs on my computer that are giving me headaches are free software that are made by people who have nothing better to do (than to make software without making it redundant).
(gotAIRBUS?) - (Got Commonality?) - (Have A Nice Flight!)
Brons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3035 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (12 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5057 times:
Got Airbus, do you work with computers? I'm a network engineer for a governmental agency, and we do not rely on Windows for mission-critical computing tasks. Sure, we all have Windows desktops, file servers, and we run Exchange for email, but anything highly critical, such as databases, our web site, monetary systems, accounting systems, etc, all run on Unix. Windows is just not as stable and reliable. Most businesses of any size are of like mind...Windows is fine for basic tasks and user's desktops, but it has no place in the datacenter or mission critical tasks.
Given all that, when your EFB does in fact get an error, if it delays a flight, it will certainly be unacceptable to airline customers/pilots.
Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
Avioniker From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1109 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4883 times:
Does the word OOPS bring anything to mind?
Jeppesen Fixing Database Problem
By Russ Niles
Some Airspace Boundary Depictions Flawed...
Well, so much for the paperless cockpit. The FAA has issued a NOTAM warning pilots using Jeppesen NavData flight-planning information to use paper charts until the company sorts out a glitch in its database that might misrepresent the boundaries of several types of special-use and controlled airspace. "This affects a small number of NavData users," said Jeppesen spokesman Mike Pound. Pound said the company has traced 350 boundary "irregularities" in the database out of more than 20,000 listed. Pound said the false boundaries can show up on data supplied directly to owners of moving-map GPS units. The aberrations can also affect flight-planning information offered by third-party vendors that use the Jeppesen database. He said the irregularities involve the precise position of the airspace boundaries. The glitch does not affect other Jeppesen data such as navaids, intersections and waypoints. The errors do not show up on Jeppesen charts, either.
...Solution At Least A Month Away
Pound said the company is working flat-out to get all the errors fixed but they won't be ready for the March publication of the monthly updates Jeppesen sends its database customers. He said the earliest the problem can be fixed is by the April 17 release of the database. "It is very important that our customers and our partners know we are aggressively working to resolve the situation," Pound said in a company news release. In the meantime, the company has prepared a comprehensive list of the mistakes and posted it as a PDF file on its Web site. Several large U.S. and Canadian airports are mentioned, including the Class B boundary at O'Hare. The errors show up in a cross section of airspace designations from all over the world. Of particular note are the problems with the boundary depictions of restricted, prohibited and dangerous special use airspace in the U.S., New Zealand, Brazil, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Most of the mistakes occur in controlled airspace boundaries and clearly not all of them are out of the way or obscure.
One may educate the ignorance from the unknowing but stupid is forever. Boswell; ca: 1533
Jsuen From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4843 times:
UNIX is far too unreliable for these things. Even the notion of a proper shutdown can't be counted upon in embedded environments. Take a look at some of the embedded realtime operating systems like QNX and Wind River VxWorks. They've found their way into EKG machines, nuclear power plants, weapons control systems and the like. VxWorks ran the Mars Pathfinder and meets aerospace standards (RTCA/DO-178B, EUROCAE/ED-12B, ARINC 653).
On the other hand, these are reliable enough to control the plane, and you'll pay for it in development costs and long term support costs. In the worst case, you crash and reboot, or end up getting vectors from the ground. Everything is a cost-safety tradeoff.
Either way electronic, Windows, or paper, you're going to be affected by errors in nav data.
Cancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4408 times:
i finally decided that i'm going to be getting the jeppesen electronic flight bag software. what i need now is to decide on a computer to run this software. what i'm trying to gifure out is shoudl i invest in a tablet pc or just a new laptop.
now, does anyone here have any experience with these types of computers? what i'm looking for is a self-contained unit, not necessarely one that needs to be hooked up to an in-aircraft display or computer to run properly.
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
Pilotpip From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3164 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4390 times:
They're great until you are out on a trip and the database expires. I had a crew that became the victims of this and I wasn't too happy when their company decided to fax 70 pages worth of jepp charts to them using up all our toner and taking up about 30 minutes while two other crews were waiting for flight plans.
QantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4466 times:
What makes you all think that EFBs only employ Microsoft operating systems? For one, the Boeing/Jeppesen EFB uses a dual Microsoft/Linux setup, adding greater flexibility while presumably reducing crash likelihood. Of course, despite this, crashes and lock-ups were rated the number-one EFB problem by KLM pilots (with regard to their EFB-equipped 777s).
Still, the advantages certainly outweigh the disadvantages. Paperwork can be worked through more quickly and, more importantly, all sorts of fuel, takeoff, and landing calculations can be made more accurately and with less chance of error. Add on top of these and more benefits the reduction of paper clutter in the flight deck - despite the fact that EFB-equipped aircraft currently still use paper as a backup - and you have a very useful system indeed!