Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Debate Over 767 Operations At MDW...  
User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 3315 times:

I've read a couple of posts where people have doubts as to whether a 763, for instance, could operate safely from MDW. Why couldn't it? It's an excellent performing aircraft, like the 753, which DOES operate from MDW on a regular basis. Putting this into perspective, let's look at operations from OGG(Maui). They only have 7,000 feet! Look at the heavies that operate from there? Currently 777s, 764s, 763s!! I'm sure they're all pretty damn heavy, too! AS all or most of those flights are NON-STOP to LAX, SFO...I think UA even has/had a NON-STOP to ORD? Does that still exist?? Hell, AF flies NON-STOP to CDG with an A343 from SXM (although that flight's gotta be severely weight restricted). That runway's only a mere 7,500 feet! Embarrassment Case and point, I realize MDW has a different set of challenges(operational wise), several obstructions surrounding their runways, threshold displacements and the like, BUT the 2 longest runways there are approx. 6,500 feet. YES, it's SHORT, but obviously long enough to handle a 757-300, so I should think a 767 wouldn't have too much trouble at all operating from MDW. Piece of cake!  Big grin

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3232 times:

The real issue is weight.

The max weight for double tandem gear at MDW is 250,000lbs. While it only limits a 757-300 a bit... it would limit a 767-300 a whole lot!

Steve


User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3183 times:

Yea, concrete strength can definitely be an issue, as the 757-300 has a much lighter footprint, but she's a LONG beast! How MUCH heavier in comparison to the -200? I'd think it'd be pretty significant.

User currently offlineAA61hvy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 13977 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3180 times:

I know the 752 MTOW is 250,000, I would imagine the 753 is around 260,000 270,000.


Go big or go home
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24320 posts, RR: 47
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3206 times:

If I am not mistaken the City of Chicago did a study back in the 90's that determined the 767-200 and A310 could indeed operate at MDW. Besides runway distance and bearing strength one of the issues of concern was wing clearance distances between taxiways and the gate areas.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7383 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2893 times:

United has no non-stop Hawaii to ORD flights,John.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

A 753's MTOW is 270,000lbs. Since MDW's pretty much in the middle of the country, they don't require full fuel, so at 250,000 you can likely get a 753 anywhere in the US with a full load of passengers on board.

Steve


User currently offlineDanielbk From Israel, joined Feb 2003, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2805 times:

Call me crazy, but on March 18th i have landed in MDW (flying a seneca.. which by the way crashed two hours later when we flew to another airport 20 miles away becuase of a front landing gear issue) - and i'm quite sure there was a northwest 747 parked at one of the gates.. i''m quite sure it was there. which leads to the question - if a 747 can land there.. should a 767 have a problem?


cockpit? it's that little room in the front of the plane where the pilots seat.. but that's not important now
User currently offlineSSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2765 times:

Danielbk, are you sure you were at MDW? I would think a NW 747 would be distinctive, and I don't recall ever hearing about a 747 at MDW. Then again, it could all be possible, but I'd like to se if someone else chimes in on this. If a 747 lands there, then I would assume a 767 could easily operate out of there.

Cheers
-Mike


User currently offlineDanielbk From Israel, joined Feb 2003, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2733 times:

Yep, landed at MDW march 18th at about 1830... (departed from ISP on the seneca 5 hours prior)


cockpit? it's that little room in the front of the plane where the pilots seat.. but that's not important now
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7927 posts, RR: 54
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

I guess if the numbers work then they'll do it. I can't work out how British Midland squeeze A321s into the downtown City airport at Belfast. I mean, the only jets into that airport used to BAe 146s and that was a bit hairy, Fly.be had an overrun incident a few years ago. I must confess I was holding my breath on the approach on the A321. Still, it worked fine, and the flights in and out were both full. I guess the low fuel load for the short flight to and from Heathrow makes it a lot easier.

What the hell is a NW 747 doing at MDW?



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineSSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2566 times:

(departed from ISP on the seneca 5 hours prior)

Apologies, could you please translate this into dumb@$$ for me? Somehow I think I should know what that means, but mysteriously I don't.

Thanks
-Mike  Big grin


User currently offlineDanielbk From Israel, joined Feb 2003, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 2529 times:

Hey Mike  Smile

i wrote that i departed ISP (McCarthur airport, Long Island.. also known as Islip Airport) 5 hours before for the flight to midway on the "Seneca 2" plane i was flying (a light twin)..

when i landed (we landed on (i think it was 04) 04L (we were on ILS for 04R and as soon as we went visual were requested to change to 04L..) and as i was on the taxi way going to "Atlantic" i remember seeing a NW 747 there. i asked the second pilot that was with me, and he remebers it too.




cockpit? it's that little room in the front of the plane where the pilots seat.. but that's not important now
User currently offlineTrnsWrld From United States of America, joined May 1999, 891 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2535 times:

That 747 at MDW is very interesting as I couldnt imagine such a plane there. Must have had low fuel and no pax on the way out.
I know TWA operated STL-OGG and back using 767-300. I recently heard that AA dropped this flight and now operates it to and from ORD. I remember departing Maui on TW 763 and we got off the ground with a decent amount of runway remaining. Flight was fairly heavy also. What airline would bring a 767 into MDW? ATA doesnt have them, Southwest obviously doesnt, NW doesnt, AA and UA both hub at ORD down the street.


User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3596 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 2522 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

TrnsWrld,

It probably would be ATA. A thread in the civil aviation mentioned a rumor that ATA would be getting 767's to replace the L-1011.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1059534/


User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 2490 times:

I'm thinking that a 747 can operate from MDW only because it's got all the additional main gear (meaning, perhaps, you can go to somewhere like twice the double tandem weight -- or at least within a 747's lightest weight).

Steve


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Debate Over 767 Operations At MDW...
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO And COex At MDW, ORF, STL posted Wed Feb 8 2006 00:16:56 by Highliner2
Crosswind Operations At SYD - 07/25 posted Mon Oct 24 2005 22:10:28 by Kaitak
Light Operations At Gate And After Landing posted Thu Jul 8 2004 06:43:09 by KBUF737
BMIbaby Operations At Egff posted Sat Sep 20 2003 21:30:26 by EGFFbmi
Delta Charter Operations At OGG posted Thu Apr 10 2003 18:51:13 by FrequentFlyKid
Why Water Condenses Over The Wing At Takeoff? posted Tue Apr 1 2003 22:04:13 by Aak777
Landing Fees At MDW posted Sun Aug 27 2000 08:18:00 by Pilot1113
UPS 757 Landing At Night W/o Lights? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:00:51 by Motopolitico
Anyone Landed At Wrong Airport Or Runway? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 12:33:28 by Redcordes
Differences In AC's 767-300? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 02:11:19 by ZBBYLW

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format