Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PW2000's In Big Trouble?  
User currently offlineJ57pw43 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1286 times:

Hi, I was wondering why the USAF would re-engine the B52H with a non american RB.211 engine when the PW2037, 2040 or 2043 would be a fine replacement & is designed and built in the US. What is exactly wrong with the PW2000 series engines? I mean, Delta, United, Northwest & TWA bought ALOT of 757's with this engine. I know that UPS & Condor used to use the PW2000 on their 757's then switched to the RB211. If the PW2000 series are that bad that even the USAF does not want them, who would. I have even heard that the PW2040 was not the engine that the USAF wanted on the C-17, but finally chose it because it was an american engine. I am fully aware that the RB211 would be built in the US by allison for the B52 re-engining, if this really does take place. I guess P&W days are numbered .



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTarantine From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1237 times:

Just because that the usaf does not want the PW2000 series does not mean they are no good! But I too have wondered what made the rolls royce version supposedly better than the PW2037. I have read that the TU-204 is also defecting to RR instead of the PW2000's

RT


User currently offlineJt8djet From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 214 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1228 times:

I would not say P&W days are numbered.
I am far from an expert on the subject, but being a line mechanic with experience on both engines. The RR engines tend to stay on wing longer than the PW.
With respects to UPS, They still have 35 757's with PW on them. They also have an order in with Airbus for 30 Pratt powered A300's


User currently offlineKing767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1215 times:

Ive heard the reason Condor chose RR to power the 753s, while they have 2000s on their 752s is because of the maintence problems experienced with the type.

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1196 times:

Don't forget that a version of the P&W 2000 series powers AIR FORCE 2 and the C-17 Globemaster III airlifter.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic PW2000's In Big Trouble?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Many Big Sonic Airplanes Were Built In US? posted Fri Feb 11 2005 22:03:38 by Lehpron
Next Big Move Forward In Aviation? posted Wed Sep 22 2004 21:39:25 by A380900
Big Headsets In Passenger Jets? posted Tue Jan 13 2004 14:19:02 by Kay
Boy Is This Guy In Trouble! posted Sat Jun 15 2002 20:36:12 by 737doctor
ERJ In Trouble With Faa? posted Sun Nov 5 2000 19:25:13 by Crjmech
777th Big Bathroom In Economy. posted Thu Sep 14 2000 22:52:26 by 777-500ER
Best Maint Services In Outstations posted Sun Dec 17 2006 13:21:24 by CactusTECH
Cooling Of Cabin Air In Engine posted Wed Dec 13 2006 03:34:25 by Jawed
Airbus In Antarctica posted Mon Dec 11 2006 07:27:04 by Cascade07
Crew Rest In-flight posted Sun Dec 10 2006 13:30:48 by FCAFLYBOY

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format