Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Alternates And Etops Alternates  
User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2801 posts, RR: 5
Posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 5898 times:

Can someone explain the requirements for ETOPS alternates? Are all ETOPS flights required to have BOTH alternates and ETOPS alternates? How many are necessary? Do 180 ETOPS flights need more alternates (or have different requirements) than a 120 ETOPS flight? Any info regarding this subject is appreciated. Thanks.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 5790 times:

We don't do ETOPS at my place, but I did want to compliment you for consistently asking some of the best questions I've seen here on a.net.

If you're asking these caliber questions at a 16-20 year age, I can only imagine what you'll be asking in your 20s and 30s.

I sense an airline career in your future...  Big grin


User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 5791 times:

In ETOPS, there is a difference between an adequate airfield and a suitable airfield.

An adequate airfield is appropriate for diversion on a planned ETOPS route. The assessment which goes into that ensures things like:

a) airfield equipped with the services like ATC, lighting, communications, weather reporting, navaids, safety cover, etc..;

b) at least one letdown aid must normally be available for an instrument approach

What makes an adequate airfield suitable for use as a planned alternate on an ETOPS sector is that:

at the anticipated time of use, weather reports and/or forecasts indicate that the weather conditions are very likely to be at or above the appropriate minima (either planning minima before dispatch or enroute minima once airbourne). Off the top of my head the wxr must be at or above these limits between 1hr before the earliest landing to 1hr after the latest landing might be made at each airfield.

The minima takes into account cloudbase and visibility, crosswind limits, etc.. The crew must satisfy themselves that on the day in question sufficient adequate airfields are available which are also suitable for the intended operation. This is the ultimate responsibility of the commander.

If we are on an ETOPS sector, we of course also must have a destination alternate as usual. This is a legal requirement. How many ETOPS alternates are required depends on the time limit imposed on the aircraft. With our 180 minute approved 763s we can cross the Atlantic comfortably with just two ETOPS alternates. If you were working to 120 or 138 minute rules you would need three (Keflavik comes into consideration here over the North Atlantic).

There are no additional requirements for 180 min ETOPS, generally fewer suitable alternates are needed since the aircraft is certified for flight on single engine for a greater time (= distance).



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineOO-AOG From Switzerland, joined Dec 2000, 1426 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5733 times:

Interesting question. In my company we don't need to follow ETOPS rules, but still have to remain within 120' of an alternate with a 2 engines aircraft. And this is often a problem when we have to fly from Europe to South America, the only south american airport we can use as an alternate being SBFN/Fernando de Noronha (Brazil) and this in order to remain within 120'. Needless to say that if ever this airport is not suitable the day of our flight.... we are in deep s**t .... either we have to wait or we have to take a northern route with the obvious fuel stop.


Falcon....like a limo but with wings
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 6835 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5660 times:

http://www.worldaerodata.com says SBFN has an 1845-meter runway. Which aircraft are allowed to use that as an alternate?

User currently offlineOO-AOG From Switzerland, joined Dec 2000, 1426 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 5637 times:

Timz

says SBFN has an 1845-meter runway. Which aircraft are allowed to use that as an alternate?

A Falcon 2000....  Big grin



Falcon....like a limo but with wings
User currently offlineM717 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 608 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5622 times:

As part of the certification process for ETOPS approval from the FAA, your diversion airports, in addition to meeting the requirements for an ETOPS alternate, such as separate (as opposed to different) suitable runways; there must also be facilities available to keep the passengers safe and out of the elements.

And, although this wasn't part of the original question, as part of the approval process, the company must also present an acceptable passenger recovery plan from the diversion airport.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Alternates And Etops Alternates
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
SYD/MEL And Etops posted Sat Dec 21 2002 02:13:21 by Gigneil
PT 91 And Alternates posted Mon May 19 2003 00:54:12 by COexpress
Current Pacific Etops Alternates? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 02:33:13 by Timz
Etops And Cargo Aircraft posted Sat Mar 18 2006 20:53:12 by Don81603
Real World Alternates posted Thu Jan 12 2006 21:54:24 by Markyp
Alternates posted Tue Jan 10 2006 15:43:37 by Markyp
Are ERJs And CRJs Etops Certified? posted Sat Jul 10 2004 00:32:45 by CRJ900
Physical Differences On Etops Aircraft And Standar posted Tue Jan 27 2004 04:52:03 by RockyRacoon
ETOPS, Fire Suppression And SR111 posted Mon May 12 2003 16:42:19 by Rmenon
Alternates For Pilots. posted Tue Oct 15 2002 14:15:46 by Bravo45
SYD/MEL And Etops posted Sat Dec 21 2002 02:13:21 by Gigneil
PT 91 And Alternates posted Mon May 19 2003 00:54:12 by COexpress
Airtran Etops And Southwest posted Fri Oct 29 2010 09:28:25 by WWTRAVELER99
Etops And Routes posted Sat Aug 7 2010 01:34:22 by simonriat
3 And 4 Engine Planes Requiring Etops posted Mon Jan 25 2010 11:04:58 by VikingA346
No ETOPS For GEnx And Trent 1000? posted Sun Apr 26 2009 09:31:33 by A342
Current Pacific Etops Alternates? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 02:33:13 by Timz
Etops And Cargo Aircraft posted Sat Mar 18 2006 20:53:12 by Don81603
SYD/MEL And Etops posted Sat Dec 21 2002 02:13:21 by Gigneil
Airtran Etops And Southwest posted Fri Oct 29 2010 09:28:25 by WWTRAVELER99
PT 91 And Alternates posted Mon May 19 2003 00:54:12 by COexpress
Etops And Routes posted Sat Aug 7 2010 01:34:22 by simonriat
Etops And Wind posted Tue Feb 18 2014 09:34:05 by goinv
Twin Jets And The Fragility Of Etops posted Tue Jun 18 2013 14:02:18 by FltAdmiralRitt
ETOPS, Still Air And The APU? posted Sat Feb 9 2013 06:54:52 by smartt1982
Airtran Etops And Southwest posted Fri Oct 29 2010 09:28:25 by WWTRAVELER99
Etops And Routes posted Sat Aug 7 2010 01:34:22 by simonriat

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format