Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search
 PPL Flight Performance + Planning
 Tom775257 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0Posted Fri Jun 27 2003 16:02:16 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2670 times:

 Hi all, I did this practise UK (JAA) PPL question, I disagree with what is supposed to be the correct answer, see what you think: ‘The true airspeed for the best rate of climb when climbing from sea level to the service ceiling: a) Tends to increase b) Tends to decrease c) Stays the same” I said a)…because Lift = Coefficient of lift x ½ x rho x V squared x S OK, so V= TAS = proportional to IAS depending on Rho (pressure). So with increasing altitude, rho decreases so you need to increase TAS (V) to compensate for the loss of lift from rho decreasing. Vy is an IAS not a TAS, correct? So if you fly Vy IAS, with increasing altitude TAS will tend to increase. Book Answer = b) Tends to decrease. Explanation: “With increasing altitude, density decreases, so engine power available together with the lift generated for a given airspeed will decay. The reduction of lift can be compensated for by increasing angle of attack which will increase drag causing speed to decay” OK so if you let speed decay you are no longer at Vy, and not actually flying best rate of climb. Hmmm, any thoughts? Cheers.
 Ralgha From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 1614 posts, RR: 5 Reply 1, posted Fri Jun 27 2003 18:30:49 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2622 times:

 Vy decreases as you climb.
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
 FSPilot747 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 3599 posts, RR: 12 Reply 2, posted Fri Jun 27 2003 18:52:18 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

 I got (b) when I first looked at the question, there's nothing wrong with the book. You aren't going to climb at Vy the whole way to, say, 7,500 feet anyways. The higher you go, the lower you're going to have your rate of climb be. The density of the air is thinner as you go higher, therefor you have less air molecules for your RAM air pressure.
 Tom775257 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted Fri Jun 27 2003 19:10:29 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2611 times:

 Thanks for the replies. Ok, so are we talking Vy IAS or TAS. Fair enough you might fly a lower IAS, but what about the TAS - even though you are say flying 5-10kts slower IAS your TAS might have increased. Surely you want to be getting more lift through increasing V than through AoA increasing coefficient of lift...obviously if you are decreasing Vy IAS while climbing, and relying on greater AoA to give the lift then the induced drag is going to be much greater. While speed up IAS and lower AoA and greatly lower induced drag (see AoA drag curve...most efficient AoA for best lift/drag generally around 4 deg +ve...surely this is what you want for best rate of climb??) (1/2 rho V squared being IAS) Remeber the question is asking about TAS not IAS. Play 'spot the big error in Toms understanding' ...please! Hmmm[Edited 2003-06-27 19:42:17]
 Tom775257 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2000, 153 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted Fri Jun 27 2003 19:18:41 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2611 times:

 Oh yeah I would just add that I don't think I am better than the book...just trying to get you guys to help me understand why I think it is wrong and thus where my knowledge is incorrect! Cheers
 Ralgha From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 1614 posts, RR: 5 Reply 5, posted Sat Jun 28 2003 00:48:41 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 2562 times:

 FSPilot: incorrect, you will (should) climb at Vy for the whole climb, but Vy decreases as you climb, so your IAS will decrease. This doesn't hold true for all airplanes/pilots as cruise climb is popular, and faster, than Vy. Tom: Whether TAS increases or decreases as you climb at Vy depends on how fast Vy decreases as you climb. For a Cessna 172RG (only POH I have handy), your true airspeed will increase ever so slightly as you climb. Of course this assumes standard atmospheric conditions. Vy at 0 feet is 84 KIAS = 84 KTAS. Vy at (for example) 4000 feet is 81 KIAS = 86 KTAS.
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
 Positive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted Sat Jun 28 2003 05:15:12 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

 I would have answered A also. For a light aircraft although your Vy IAS may decrease as you climb, this will be offset by the increase in TAS as you climb. But then again the question is asking about service celing which is around 18,000feet or something isn't it for a typical 172?
 Ralgha From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 1614 posts, RR: 5 Reply 7, posted Sat Jun 28 2003 08:17:00 UTC (11 years 9 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 2508 times:

 The top of the climb chart for the 172RG is 12000, at which point Vy = 75 KIAS = 90 KTAS, so it's still climbing at that point. It will probably continue to do so up to the service ceiling of 16800.
 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
 Top Of Page Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat Forum Index

Reply To This Topic PPL Flight Performance + Planning
• Tech/Ops related posts only!
• Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
• No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
• No hostile language or criticizing of others.
• Do not post copyright protected material.
• Use relevant and describing topics.
• DETAILED RULES

 Similar topics: More similar topics...
Financing PPL Flight Training posted Wed Sep 3 2003 01:54:41 by N844AA
Sabre Flight Planning posted Fri Oct 20 2006 22:22:04 by Dispatchguy
Flight Planning Utility? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 16:38:53 by Brendan03
Pre-flight Planning posted Wed Feb 1 2006 10:43:36 by Newagebird
Net Flight Path And All-engine Performance posted Sun Dec 4 2005 16:40:15 by BKAA
Advice On Flight Training (PPL) In The US, Please posted Mon Mar 28 2005 02:54:09 by Aloges
Great Circle Tracks And Flight Planning Q? posted Sun Jan 30 2005 16:00:09 by Pilotaydin
Inflight/Flight Planning Calculations posted Mon Dec 1 2003 07:20:04 by Airbus Lover
How Does Flight Envelope Relate To Performance? posted Sun Nov 17 2002 01:01:44 by Lehpron
Online Resources For Flight Planning posted Tue Jan 15 2002 15:41:05 by Dufo