Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search
 Physics Problem
 Saab340 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 320 posts, RR: 2Posted Mon Aug 11 2003 22:32:03 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2529 times:

 Came across this problem which I cannot figure out in Jeppesen Sanderson PHYSICS FOR AVIATION. Here it goes: "The air pressure and density at a point on the wing of a B 747 flying at an altitude of 2900 m are 71.0 kPa, and 0.919 kg/m^3 respectively. What is the temperature at this point on the wing in degrees Centigrade?" I would very much appreciate the process taken to figure this problem out shown for understanding. Thank you all very much for your help! Paul
 Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 7231 posts, RR: 7 Reply 1, posted Mon Aug 11 2003 23:03:57 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2432 times:

 Presumably the 747 and the altitude are irrelevant? At a specified pressure and specified density the temperature is determined by them alone?
 MITaero From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 497 posts, RR: 7 Reply 2, posted Mon Aug 11 2003 23:29:00 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2406 times:

 You just need the pressure and the density. If you assume that the air is ideal, and find the "molar mass" of air (about 29 g/mol, look it up online), you can just use the ideal gas law in terms of density to find temperature. PV=nRT (where P=pressure, V=vol, n=# of moles, R=const, T=temp) PV=(g/MM)*RT (where g is mass of gas, MM is molar mass) P=(g/V)(RT/MM) since g/V is density (rho), P=rho*RT/MM so P*(MM) = rho*R*T be careful with units - if you need more help, just ask again.
 FlightSimFreak From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 720 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted Mon Aug 11 2003 23:49:36 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2403 times:

 It's been all summer since I've been in school, so don't crucify me if I get something wrong, just correct me. OK, for reference, P is pressure in Pascals, T is temperature in Kelvin, D is density in Kg/m^3 and R is the ideal gas constant, or 287 K Kg/ Pa M^3. The equation I'm going to use is the Ideal gas law solved for T. T=P/(D*R) We know P, D, and R... So it's a simple matter now of "plug and chug" as my math teacher used to say... Plug it in to the calculator, and chug out the answer... 71.0 kPa is 71000 Pascals... T=71000/(.919*287) or... 269.19 K or -3.96 C Phew, I hope I didn't mess that one up, that was a doozie
 Bobrayner From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2003, 2227 posts, RR: 6 Reply 4, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 00:01:21 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2402 times:

 Not entirely irrelevant   as altitude increases, molar mass goes down a little, which means the ideal gas law will produce different numbers. At 2900m, air composition is pretty normal. Anyway. Let's set up some variables and constants. P = Pressure (Pascals, not atmospheres or mmHg or whatever); D = Density; V = Volume; T = Temperature (Kelvin); n = Number of moles of gas in a given volume; R = universal gas constant (8.3144 J per mole degree) M = Mass of a given volume of gas Ideal gas law: PV=nRT Also, V=M/D So, (P / D).(M / n) = RT. The (M / n) is the value that would slowly change with altitude, or indeed if you were flying over Venus instead of Earth, but for this case we can use the typical molar mass of air, hence 28.92g/mole . R is always 8.3144 in these units. Therefore, T = (P / D) . (3.478) Be careful with units, significant figures, &c &c
 Cunning linguist
 MITaero From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 497 posts, RR: 7 Reply 5, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 00:08:06 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2388 times:

 I know the ideal gas law is an approx. for air, but.. >as altitude increases, molar mass goes down a little the mass of one mole, or 6.02e23 molecules or whatever it is should not change, no matter the state of the gas. any two thermodynamic properties of a gas define the thermodynamic state of the gas (see http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/thermo_2.htm for verification). In this case, density and pressure are enough.
 Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 7231 posts, RR: 7 Reply 6, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 00:26:51 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2384 times:

 I guess he means the air has a higher percentage of nitrogen at higher altitudes. Which would of course lower the molar mass.
 Bobrayner From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2003, 2227 posts, RR: 6 Reply 7, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 01:13:38 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

 the mass of one mole, or 6.02e23 molecules or whatever it is should not change, no matter the state of the gas. Avogadro's number does not change. The molar mass varies with the composition of the gas. This is a bit of an irrelevance, since the atmosphere is well-mixed below 80km (IE anywhere you're likely to find an airliner) so composition changes with altitude are quite small, although not always negligible. any two thermodynamic properties of a gas define the thermodynamic state of the gas Presuming you're dealing with the same gas at all times.
 Cunning linguist
 MITaero From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 497 posts, RR: 7 Reply 8, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 01:19:11 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

 Hey Bobrayner, you're right about those two points. Hopefully he doesn't have to discuss that in his answer.
 Saab340 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 320 posts, RR: 2 Reply 9, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 03:01:17 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

 Thank you all for the input. Can we call the answer -4 c???? Paul
 PilotHighFlyer From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 220 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 03:18:38 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

 This reminds me of chem...wow No don't round to 4, keep the answer out to hundredth or thousandths for accuracy, especially if you have to use the answer in another problem. ~Robert
 Bobrayner From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2003, 2227 posts, RR: 6 Reply 11, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 03:40:26 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

 Your answer is as accurate as the least accurate input - in this case, the pressure. Round accordingly?
 Cunning linguist
 MITaero From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 497 posts, RR: 7 Reply 12, posted Tue Aug 12 2003 04:56:01 UTC (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2265 times:

 Yeah, use 3 significant digits. (71.0 kPa and .919 kg/m^3 both have 3 sig figs)
 Top Of Page Change Forum... Civil Aviation Travel, Polls & Prefs Tech/Ops Aviation Hobby Aviation Photography Photography Feedback Trip Reports Military Av & Space Non-Aviation Site Related LIVE Chat Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Physics Problem
• Tech/Ops related posts only!
• Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
• No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
• No hostile language or criticizing of others.
• Do not post copyright protected material.
• Use relevant and describing topics.
• DETAILED RULES

 Similar topics: More similar topics...
737: GEN Fail With Flat Battery Problem posted Sat Aug 5 2006 07:14:40 by Mandala499
Is This A Problem (SXM Landing Situation) posted Thu Jul 20 2006 23:06:33 by SuseJ772
Sita Problem Today posted Mon Jun 12 2006 18:25:56 by Zruda
Problem In The Cockpit - What Would You Do? posted Fri Jan 6 2006 22:02:10 by Julesmusician
Do We Have A Problem With Maitenance posted Thu Dec 22 2005 04:25:12 by Ualflyer
Fuel Problem posted Sun Dec 18 2005 04:56:21 by Cancidas
The SAA 744 Pressurisation Problem posted Mon Sep 26 2005 12:52:23 by SA-JET
Cause - Aquaplaning Or Autobrake/Antiskid Problem posted Wed Sep 21 2005 09:47:55 by HAWK21M
380 Landing Gear Problem posted Tue Jul 26 2005 05:18:55 by Venus6971
SAA 747-4 Problem At IAD Today posted Mon Jul 25 2005 23:41:44 by Mcdonobr