Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Did People Survive A320 Crash  
User currently offlineUpsmd11 From United States of America, joined May 2003, 809 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3141 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There is a post in the Civil Aviation forum regarding aircraft people feel safe on and don't feel safe on. Someone commented about the A320 and the fly-by-wire design of it's controls.

After looking at the information on the Air France crash at the air show I wonder how did so many people survive this crash? The report says that only 3 of 136(?) perished. While any loss of life is a grim reality of the dangers of flight, this is amazing that the aircraft was totally destroyed and so many people lived.

Does anybody have any ideas on why this is the case? There was a huge fireball too -- usually fire kills people.

Thanks,
John

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN777UA From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3064 times:

When the plane crashed, it was going very slowly & kinda settled into the woods, instead of slamming down, plus the fuselage stayed intact.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4489 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3042 times:

N777UA is correct. The fuselage stayed intact for at least a little while until it was destroyed by fire, although geeze....the video of the explosion was unreal, it's hard to believe the airplane could have survived that long. Also, I think a typical evacuation takes somewhere on the order of a minute or two--I'm sure there are some flight crews browsing the forums who would be able to tell you a lot better than I could.


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3031 times:

I believe it is an FAA / JAA requirement that any passenger aircraft must be able to be evacuated in full (i.e. at maximum capacity) within 90 seconds with half the emergency exits blocked. They do tests to prove it for any design.


Regards

Ikarus


User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8702 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

I've seen numerous TV broadcasts that back Ikarus' point; and this requirement seems to be a true problem for Airbus engineers trying to meet it on the A380.


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2973 times:

I thought the chief problem on the A380 was the large number of upper deck doors and slides - which aren't terribly wind resistant on the 744, for example... I remember someone mentioning that the Singapore Airlines crash (admittedly in the middle of a hurricane) showed that passengers from the upper deck weren't able to deplane until they went downstairs - the wind just blew the slide to the side.

They better ensure they only use test subjects who aren't afraid of heights at all for those tests...  Big grin

Regards

Ikarus


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29792 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

Plastic Airplanes bounce  Laugh out loud


Seriously though.

There used to be a saying amoung the bush pilots that if an airplane hit tail first it will be a survivable crash, if the plane hits nose first, it will be a deadly accident.

A lot of what makes a crash survivable has very little to do with the design of the aircraft but the circumstances of the crash. Slow speed and not hitting any trees nose one tends to help.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineLstc From Canada, joined Jun 2003, 320 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2755 times:

The large fire ball in the famous video was due to the wings being sheared and the fuel spilling out. Fortunately for many of the people on board, that meant that much of the burning fuel was left behind the fuselage wreckage as it made its way through the forest.

Aircraft accidents that occur close to the ground at low speeds, in normal attitudes are typically very surviveable.

Those who say A-320s are less safe than corresponding non-FBW aircraft are addressing a gut feeling they have about technology that is false and they are ignoring the design data. You simply can't certify an aircraft that is inherently unsafe. If anything, the A320 was subject to higher standards than many "conventional" aircraft such as the 727/737/747/767 as it was certified to later more stringent standards.



User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2669 times:

I'm no expert, but perhaps the aircraft being a 320-100 without the centre fuel tank helped?

But then again since it was a flying display even if there was a centre fuel tank, it wouldn't have been filled as the wing tanks usually have to be full before filling the centre tank on the 320 Family.

It did appear the trees played a roll in cushioning the aircraft.

What I want to know is why was the aircraft full of passengers on a flying display?

Airbus_A340



People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
User currently offlineSuspen From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 156 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2643 times:

What I want to know is why was the aircraft full of passengers on a flying display?

It was full of members of the flying club at Mulhouse-Habsheim.
They "chartered" the display.



Tower: "Cessna xxxx, state your intentions", Cessna: "To become airline pilot"
User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (10 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2628 times:

Suspen- thank you for that!  Smile


People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic How Did People Survive A320 Crash
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Did JA8032 Crash? posted Mon Sep 1 2003 05:07:25 by Suspen
Indian Airlines 1990 A320 Crash posted Tue Aug 29 2006 20:10:20 by Vikkyvik
Would People Survive A Decompression On Concorde? posted Wed Nov 23 2005 00:09:18 by TheSonntag
How Will Or How Did The A380 Handle Certification? posted Mon Jan 24 2005 20:34:23 by JumboJim747
How Did Concorde Land? posted Wed Dec 15 2004 21:18:43 by Gregviperrt
How Did The Caravelle 6R Reversers Work? posted Sun Aug 15 2004 06:25:04 by FriendlySkies
Ok, How Did They Paint This? posted Tue Jun 15 2004 16:40:10 by Cancidas
How Did Pilots Get By Without An FMC? posted Sun Jan 18 2004 02:01:13 by Gerry
How Did The Blackout In The Northeast Affect Ops? posted Fri Aug 15 2003 16:21:06 by Mirrodie
How Did Columbia Survive Launch posted Mon Jul 28 2003 01:17:01 by Jhooper

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format