Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Main Undercarriage Rotation/position  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

look at this two pixs, why are the main wheels in the back rotated forwards in one and back in another?

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/284080/M/


http://www.airliners.net/open.file/401141/M/

does it bother the landing






The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

Gear retraction (geometry position) requires the gear to be in like this.
At least in the 747... and other Boeing birds...
On touch down, this gives the the airplane signal it is "on the ground"...
I.e. ground spoilers deployment in the 747...
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1624 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1411 times:

Skipper-
That's interesting...before today I simply thought that the center of gravity on the bogies was forward/aft of the pivot point, and I wondered why the 767 is the only airliner which has forward-tilting bogies. Interesting explanation!
Some questions: what happens during a crosswind landing when only one main bogey touches down? Do the speedbrakes/ground spoilers deploy? Only one side? Not at all? Also, on a normal landing, do the autobrakes engage when the nosewheel is lowered? Thanks in advance!
-N243NW Big grin



B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12386 posts, RR: 47
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1392 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As far as I know, the 767 is far from the only airliner with forward tilting gear. Certainly a number of older Russian planes featured this - I always thought they looked so cool coming in to land. I'm sure the Tu-154 was like this, which just added to its mega-cool aura. I also think the centre bogey on the A340-5/600 does the same.

Steve.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

As to all the automatic functions at touch down, some are activated by the truck leveling, if it does not work, by wheel spin up, and often, if that does not work, nose gear touch down as backup. Many backups...
Both sides must provide a signal (crosswind question)...
As an example, wheel spin up provides for spoilers deployment... if it did not go by wheel spin, the nose wheel touch down will do...
xxx
Forward or rear tilt... I would not know the difference when landing...
Is just a function of the gear retractiom geometry by aircraft design...
Honest, an irrelevant consideration...
xxx
Hope this answers your questions...
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3465 posts, RR: 47
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1270 times:

Forward or rear tilt... I would not know the difference when landing...

There is usually slightly more vibration on initial contact with forward tilted gear assemblies. A bit more difficult to make "greaser" landings. Very dependent upon individual aircraft design. i.e. 767-200 is almost always a "rougher" landing than 767-300 (probably nobody but pilots would notice though). Other than that... no noticable differences. JMHO.  Wink/being sarcastic



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1266 times:

I admit that as a pilot in the 747, sometimes on training or test flights, there are times when it feels that you can almost identify each pair of wheels as they come in contact with the runway.
xxx
This subject was discussed before - and the procedure(s) for "smooth kiss" landings are definitely not recommended and potentially unsafe, there again, my admission that I have played these games in the past.
xxx
In the DC8s that I once flew (ONA) we did not "arm" the spoilers for touch down to impress passengers. I described "what can be done" - same idea for the 747... and I often mentioned that landing a heavy cargo airplane, is generally much "smoother" than a light/empty passenger 747... Maybe, AAR90 it could be that the 767-300 being slightly heavier has a smoother landing.
xxx
There are airplanes that a are inherently smooth landing airplanes, definitely the 747 is... and rough, the case of the DC8... I only know the 707s and the 727s besides that... The 707 was very smooth at touch down, the 727 did require some experience to achieve a smooth touchdown.
xxx
Continue back pressure (and slow flare/rotation) prior to touch down does "increase" the vertical speed at which a set of wheels enters in contact with the runway, as the wheels are aft of the axis. What I personally do in a 747, is, just prior to touch down, when the "10 feet" radio altimeter voice call is heard, - about a second later (I assume I am 5 feet above), I reduce the "back pressure" on the controls, slightly decreasing the attitude - let us say about one degree, to achieve touch down - this decreases the "vertical speed" of the wheels that will first touch down... touch down is achieved about a second after that reduction of "flare" back pressure...
xxx
Hope my explanation is clear, pilots here, know what I mentioned...
Happy contrails...
(s) Skipper

xxx


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Main Undercarriage Rotation/position
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rotation posted Fri Apr 27 2007 23:35:42 by Relic
Stowed Position Of 747 Body Gear? posted Sun Mar 25 2007 21:36:06 by PC12Fan
Aircraft Rotation (The Design) posted Sat Mar 24 2007 21:01:56 by Rush744
Moment Of Inertia & Aircraft Rotation posted Thu Mar 22 2007 22:28:08 by Rush744
747 Main Landing Gear Bogeys posted Fri Mar 16 2007 23:22:02 by WestJetForLife
5 Wheel Main Landing Gear? posted Wed Mar 14 2007 19:42:53 by Rush744
Q400 Main Cabin Door Higher Than Other Dash 8s? posted Thu Mar 8 2007 05:17:36 by Flyboy80
FAA New "Position And Hold" Policy posted Wed Feb 7 2007 17:29:16 by IAHFLYR
Flight Crew Rotation On 17-hour Flight posted Mon Jan 1 2007 22:34:28 by Jawed
Main Landing Gear Load For Airliners. posted Sun Dec 24 2006 00:25:54 by Ps76

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format