Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Schematics  
User currently offlineCdfmxtech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1341 posts, RR: 26
Posted (11 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2689 times:

Anyone in hear come across alot of discrepancies in Boeing schematics??
I have found a couple in the past.

From what I understand from alot of guys that work Douglas, Douglas made horrible AMMs (which I can definetly attest to based on the MD80 AMM), but the Douglas schematics (LAMM) and troubleshooting TAFIs are excellent.

Boeing makes very good AMMs, but they seem to make more errors in the schematics.

Avioniker, if you're out there I've got a good one for you.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

I've worked with the DC10 MD11 AMM's for a long time now and I like them better than the Boeing manuals. I used to work with the DC8 AMM's too. I thought that they where pretty good.


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineLstc From Canada, joined Jun 2003, 320 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2569 times:

There are mistakes in ALL AMMs and wiring diagram manuals, no matter what the manufacturer. There is a reader service card at the front of manuals for reporting errors.

The surprising thing is that several have been there for years. Either the maintainers don't bother reporting the mistakes or they don't read the manuals...I'm not sure which.


User currently offlineAvioniker From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1109 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (11 years ago) and read 2504 times:

Funny you should mention me.
I just got back from Seattle.
This is just a personal opinion but for the last fifteen years or so the people putting the books together seem more interested in making a name for themselves than making usable data.
The only good thing I can see going on is that Boeing has adopted the McD philosophy on schematic books and now produces an SSM.
As far as mistakes go the people in Seattle are busily pointing fingers at the operators engineering departments and vice versa.
I have one simple fix.
Get rid of simplified English and the people that think it's a good idea. That seems to be where the degradation in our tech data started and continues to be perpetuated.

Cdfmxtech
Looks like you and I are completely on the same page on this one.



One may educate the ignorance from the unknowing but stupid is forever. Boswell; ca: 1533
User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (10 years 12 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2460 times:

Interesting differences between Boeing/ MDD and Airbus schematics. Boeing and Lamm normally present schematics as systems configured normal (example; door indication system with door closed) with power off. Airbus is the opposite (door is open).

Also, many schematics require a cross reference to other schematics to gain a full understanding of the system. Also many mistakes.

But all in all very good schematics.



You're only as good as your last departure.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Boeing Schematics
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Wing Antice On Boeing Aircraft. posted Fri Dec 8 2006 22:19:09 by TristarSteve
Boeing Equivalent To Take Off Flex posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:53:21 by Aak777
Airbus And Boeing Throttle Controls posted Tue Dec 5 2006 15:30:41 by Treeny
Boeing Wiper Park Position posted Mon Dec 4 2006 19:14:26 by Musang
Structural Seminar - Boeing posted Thu Nov 9 2006 13:41:45 by HAWK21M
Boeing 737 Minimum Take-off/Landing Requirements posted Fri Nov 3 2006 16:22:57 by NZ8800
Boeing 747-400BCF posted Sun Oct 15 2006 13:43:57 by Qantas744ER
How Do Boeing/Airbus Conduct Pressurization Tests? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 08:02:04 by Brenintw
Boeing Paint Hangers posted Mon Oct 9 2006 22:40:55 by KBFIspotter
Boeing 737-600/700 Versus Embraer ERJ-195 posted Fri Oct 6 2006 09:45:33 by AerospaceFan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format