OOPJV From Belgium, joined Jun 2003, 48 posts, RR: 0 Posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3546 times:
When seeing pictures of the Concorde cockpit, the Embraer 170, and the new Hawker Horizon, I wonder why the designers opt for the ram horn yoke.
Does this type of yoke present advantages compared to the more traditional yoke?
I am not a pilot, but I have the feeling that flying with a ram horn yoke must me strange, and less comfortable for the hands to rest on...
Or does the type of yoke make little difference, given the fact that most planes fly on automatic pilot, and that the yoke is only used at take of and landing...
Thanks for any info...
JBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3366 times:
I'd say Lehpron's reason is probably reasonable. I know plenty of pilots (some of them airline pilots) that often times (except on takeoff or landing obviously) fly the airplane by resting their hands on the tops of the traditional yoke. It is more comfortable especially when you've gotta have your hands on the yoke for an extended period of time, since you're not twisting your wrist and gripping.
Jetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3321 times:
The English and the Brazilians aren't the only ones who have used them - they are also installed on the Turbo Commander 690A series aircraft and later. There is really no real advantage to them one way or the other. The same actually goes for sticks, yokes, and side sticks. The British also had a "hoop" on top of the control stick arrangement that they used during WWII. Any of them do what they're supposed to do and, like anything else, there are advantages and disadvantages to each. Personally, I really don't care for the Ram's Horn style - for purely aesthetic reasons.