Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airliners Still Use INS?  
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1819 times:

Folks,

According to some theories, the unfortunate KE 007 shootdown was caused by the fact the pilot of the plane did not program the inertial navigation system (INS) properly, which resulted in the plane going off-course and into Soviet territory on its flight from ANC to SEL in 1983.

With today's GPS (and after 2008, Galileo) satellite navigation systems (which has accuracy around 10 meters), do airliners still need to program the INS system while the plane is on the ground? Or is INS replaced by systems that work by receiving satellite navigation signals?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1793 times:

Yes airliners still need to program a position into the INS. Ironically on some aircraft all you have to do is take the GPS position and punch it into the INS.

User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21485 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

a) GPS has its limitations - notably on polar routes. Galileo is supposed to alleviate those, but we´re not there, yet.

b) You need to have a backup in case GPS reception (or even transmission!) should fail.


User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1695 times:

The Classic 747s sure still have INS...
xxx
The airplanes I presently fly are equipped with 3 INS (which are operated in "triple mix") - and we have 2 GPS to update #1 and #2 INS... By triple mixing it also updates the #3 INS... We also have DME update capability.
All that gives us maximum accuracy for RNP-5 operations (MNPS)...
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

You can think of it this way.

The main advantage of the Inertial Navigation System, or INS, is simply that it's internal...fully contained in the aircraft. One disadvantage is that on average, it loses accuracy at the rate of about one nautical mile per hour.

The main advantage of GPS is of course its accuracy. GPS signals for civilian use, however, are very weak....extremely weak, in fact....and may provide inadequate reception and with loss of RAIM can be error-prone in some areas.

So GPS in a transport-category airplane that's equipped with an INS type system periodically updates the INS, thereby producing the "best of both worlds" so to speak.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2395 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

Qantas 747-400s use three IRS (Inertial Reference Systems, not the tax man) updated with VOR/DME and two onboard GPS.
The 767s use three IRS updated with VOR/DME, with several aircraft equipped with GPS.
The 747-300s use three INS, however they are now being updated with IRS and GPS as part of a refit.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1577 times:

As has already been mentioned INS is completely self contained, which is a good thing.

What good is having 2 or 3 GPS systems if they all run off the same satellites?



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

Dear L-188 -
With 2 GPS - you can continue with one GPS remaining if second fails, the one unit will provide sufficient update, to the INS in "T-Mix"... Our current configuration still gives full flexibility, i.e. in cas of one INS on MEL... It was the least inexpensive upgrade, using these LTN-92 type INS systems. Remember, DME update requires DME stations... not too many right in the middle of the oceans...
Happy contrails -
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineDon From Japan, joined Jun 2003, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1460 times:

If my memory serves me correctly, KAL 007 INSs were programmed correctly but they left the Navigation mode select switch in HDG position instead of INS position. So basically INS were not given the task of navigating. It was not an INS error but a pilot error.

I am not familiar with the latest generation aircrafts but I suspect that even on today's most sophiticated aircrafts same mistake can happen , But track deviation alert and warnings are better, I am sure.


User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

The most plausible theory behind KAL 007 is the INS being left in HDG mode. Unfortunately the FDR and CVR were never recovered by the NTSB so they'll never be 100% sure.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

Skipper believe it or not but there are dead spots on the north side of the Brooks range of Alaska where you can't pick up the three satillites you need for navigation.

I am sure that it is the same at other polar locations.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1453 times:

Dear L-188 -
xxx
Very well aware of "dead spots" in Polar areas - but if we lost the update capability (from GPS) for 1 hour or 2... the INS in T-Mix keep sufficient accuracy to even be called capable of MNPS (RNP-5)... no problems in case that happens...
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineYikes! From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

The KAL flight was flying a direct routing, one done on many occasions. This time they got caught. Couple the practice with the hot-headed MIG pilot and history was made.

No secret with this episode.

Re: the question asked - lots of modern day airliners use INS as secondary nav in BRNAV airspace and primary in "IRS NAV ONLY" airspace.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Airliners Still Use INS?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which Airlines Still Use The LTN-72 INS posted Sun Mar 17 2002 02:22:02 by AdamHarvard
BizJets & Airliners Use Same Engine? posted Fri Mar 22 2002 21:15:14 by Mr Spaceman
Why Don't Anybody Build Airliners Out Of Steel? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 04:19:24 by 747400sp
Oasis Hongkong: Permission To Use Russian Airspace posted Fri Dec 8 2006 22:07:23 by A300605R
Single Engine Airliners Of The Future? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 15:59:29 by DHHornet
Does 777 Use VORs posted Mon Nov 27 2006 13:54:43 by Gopal
"Use Correct Length Fasteners" posted Fri Oct 27 2006 22:25:48 by Andz
Relief Valves Practical Use posted Fri Oct 20 2006 16:12:26 by HAWK21M
What Naca Airfoil Type Does The 747-400 Use? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 15:06:04 by Flybyguy
Auto-pilot Landing On Commercial Airliners? posted Fri Oct 6 2006 17:26:23 by Jawed

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format